%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : CSR059+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 03:01:59 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.27s 1.45s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.27s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 19 ( 7 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 34 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 26 ( 11 ~; 8 |; 2 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 12 ( 0 sgn 8 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query109,conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt)
=> borderson(c_georegion_l4_x57_y47,c_georegion_l4_x56_y47) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',query109) ).
fof(ax1_1123,axiom,
! [X20,X21] :
( ( mtvisible(X20)
& genlmt(X20,X21) )
=> mtvisible(X21) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_1123) ).
fof(ax1_104,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member5_mt)
=> borderson(c_georegion_l4_x56_y47,c_georegion_l4_x57_y47) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_104) ).
fof(ax1_407,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt,c_tptpgeo_member5_mt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_407) ).
fof(ax1_900,axiom,
! [X13,X14] :
( borderson(X13,X14)
=> borderson(X14,X13) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_900) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt)
=> borderson(c_georegion_l4_x57_y47,c_georegion_l4_x56_y47) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query109]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X22,X23] :
( ~ mtvisible(X22)
| ~ genlmt(X22,X23)
| mtvisible(X23) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_1123])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt)
& ~ borderson(c_georegion_l4_x57_y47,c_georegion_l4_x56_y47) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member5_mt)
| borderson(c_georegion_l4_x56_y47,c_georegion_l4_x57_y47) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_104]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( mtvisible(X1)
| ~ genlmt(X2,X1)
| ~ mtvisible(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt,c_tptpgeo_member5_mt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax1_407]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
fof(c_0_12,plain,
! [X15,X16] :
( ~ borderson(X15,X16)
| borderson(X16,X15) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_900])]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( borderson(c_georegion_l4_x56_y47,c_georegion_l4_x57_y47)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member5_mt) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member5_mt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11])]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( borderson(X1,X2)
| ~ borderson(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
borderson(c_georegion_l4_x56_y47,c_georegion_l4_x57_y47),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14])]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
~ borderson(c_georegion_l4_x57_y47,c_georegion_l4_x56_y47),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_17]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : CSR059+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.07/0.12 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 18:51:53 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.27/1.45 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.27/1.45 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.27/1.45 # Preprocessing time : 0.032 s
% 0.27/1.45
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof found!
% 0.27/1.45 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.27/1.45 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object total steps : 19
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object clause steps : 9
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object formula steps : 10
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object conjectures : 5
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object clause conjectures : 2
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object initial clauses used : 6
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object initial formulas used : 5
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object generating inferences : 2
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 5
% 0.27/1.45 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.27/1.45 # Parsed axioms : 1132
% 0.27/1.45 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 1112
% 0.27/1.45 # Initial clauses : 21
% 0.27/1.45 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Initial clauses in saturation : 21
% 0.27/1.45 # Processed clauses : 27
% 0.27/1.45 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # ...remaining for further processing : 27
% 0.27/1.45 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.27/1.45 # Generated clauses : 13
% 0.27/1.45 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 8
% 0.27/1.45 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Paramodulations : 13
% 0.27/1.45 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Current number of processed clauses : 26
% 0.27/1.45 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 8
% 0.27/1.45 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.27/1.45 # Non-unit-clauses : 16
% 0.27/1.45 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2
% 0.27/1.45 # ...number of literals in the above : 3
% 0.27/1.45 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.27/1.45 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 19
% 0.27/1.45 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 17
% 0.27/1.45 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.27/1.45 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.27/1.45 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.27/1.45 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Termbank termtop insertions : 8182
% 0.27/1.45
% 0.27/1.45 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.27/1.45 # User time : 0.029 s
% 0.27/1.45 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.27/1.45 # Total time : 0.034 s
% 0.27/1.45 # Maximum resident set size: 5140 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------