↑ Up

SPASS---3.9.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : CSR059+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 23:24:50 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 2.26s 2.50s
% Output   : Refutation 2.26s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.13  % Problem  : CSR059+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.13/0.14  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.15/0.35  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.15/0.35  % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 18:46:19 EDT 2022
% 0.15/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 2.26/2.50  
% 2.26/2.50  SPASS V 3.9 
% 2.26/2.50  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 2.26/2.50  % SZS status Theorem
% 2.26/2.50  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 2.26/2.50  SPASS derived 3692 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 3736 clauses.
% 2.26/2.50  SPASS allocated 101146 KBytes.
% 2.26/2.50  SPASS spent	0:00:02.06 on the problem.
% 2.26/2.50  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 2.26/2.50  		0:00:00.18 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 2.26/2.50  		0:00:00.12 for inferences.
% 2.26/2.50  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 2.26/2.50  		0:00:01.35 for the reduction.
% 2.26/2.50  
% 2.26/2.50  
% 2.26/2.50  Here is a proof with depth 1, length 13 :
% 2.26/2.50  % SZS output start Refutation
% 2.26/2.50  1[0:Inp] ||  -> mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt)*.
% 2.26/2.50  216[0:Inp] ||  -> genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt,c_tptpgeo_member5_mt)*l.
% 2.26/2.50  268[0:Inp] || borderson(c_georegion_l4_x57_y47,c_georegion_l4_x56_y47)* -> .
% 2.26/2.50  461[0:Inp] || mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member5_mt) -> borderson(c_georegion_l4_x56_y47,c_georegion_l4_x57_y47)*.
% 2.26/2.50  997[0:Inp] || genlmt(u,v)*+ -> microtheory(u)*.
% 2.26/2.50  1048[0:Inp] || borderson(u,v)*+ -> borderson(v,u)*.
% 2.26/2.50  1082[0:Inp] mtvisible(u) || genlmt(u,v)*+ -> mtvisible(v)*.
% 2.26/2.50  1135[0:Res:1048.1,268.0] || borderson(c_georegion_l4_x56_y47,c_georegion_l4_x57_y47)* -> .
% 2.26/2.50  1136[0:MRR:461.1,1135.0] || mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member5_mt)* -> .
% 2.26/2.50  4203[0:Res:216.0,997.0] ||  -> microtheory(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt)*.
% 2.26/2.50  5162[0:Res:216.0,1082.1] mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt) ||  -> mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member5_mt)*.
% 2.26/2.50  5282[0:SSi:5162.0,1.0,4203.0] ||  -> mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member5_mt)*.
% 2.26/2.50  5283[0:MRR:5282.0,1136.0] ||  -> .
% 2.26/2.50  % SZS output end Refutation
% 2.26/2.50  Formulae used in the proof : query109 ax1_407 ax1_104 ax1_1127 ax1_900 ax1_1123
% 2.26/2.50  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------