%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR059+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:16:22 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.42s 0.77s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.42s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 19 ( 7 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 34 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 26 ( 11 ~; 8 |; 2 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 12 ( 0 sgn 8 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query159,conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt)
=> borderson(c_georegion_l4_x57_y47,c_georegion_l4_x56_y47) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query159) ).
fof(ax2_7997,axiom,
! [X21,X22] :
( ( genlmt(X21,X22)
& mtvisible(X21) )
=> mtvisible(X22) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_7997) ).
fof(ax2_489,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member5_mt)
=> borderson(c_georegion_l4_x56_y47,c_georegion_l4_x57_y47) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_489) ).
fof(ax2_2388,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt,c_tptpgeo_member5_mt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_2388) ).
fof(ax2_7642,axiom,
! [X15,X16] :
( borderson(X15,X16)
=> borderson(X16,X15) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_7642) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt)
=> borderson(c_georegion_l4_x57_y47,c_georegion_l4_x56_y47) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query159]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X30,X31] :
( mtvisible(X31)
| ~ genlmt(X30,X31)
| ~ mtvisible(X30) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_7997])])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
( ~ borderson(c_georegion_l4_x57_y47,c_georegion_l4_x56_y47)
& mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
( borderson(c_georegion_l4_x56_y47,c_georegion_l4_x57_y47)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member5_mt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_489])]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( ~ genlmt(X1,X2)
| ~ mtvisible(X1)
| mtvisible(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt,c_tptpgeo_member5_mt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax2_2388]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
fof(c_0_12,plain,
! [X27,X28] :
( borderson(X28,X27)
| ~ borderson(X27,X28) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_7642])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member5_mt)
| borderson(c_georegion_l4_x56_y47,c_georegion_l4_x57_y47) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member5_mt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11])]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ~ borderson(X1,X2)
| borderson(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
borderson(c_georegion_l4_x56_y47,c_georegion_l4_x57_y47),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14])]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
~ borderson(c_georegion_l4_x57_y47,c_georegion_l4_x56_y47),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_17]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04 % Problem : CSR059+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.00/0.07 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.17/0.43 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.43 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.43 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.43 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.17/0.43 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.17/0.43 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.43 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.17/0.43 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:39:58 UTC 2026
% 0.17/0.44 % CPUTime :
% 0.17/0.44 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.23/0.50 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.23/0.50 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.42/0.77 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.42/0.77 % Preprocessing class: FMLLMMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.42/0.77 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.42/0.77 % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.42/0.77 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.42/0.77 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.42/0.77 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.42/0.77 % new_bool_1 with pid 2016446 completed with status 0
% 0.42/0.77 % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.42/0.77 % Preprocessing class: FMLLMMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.42/0.77 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.42/0.77 % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.42/0.77 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.42/0.77 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.42/0.77 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.42/0.77 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.42/0.77 % Search class: FHUNF-FFSM11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.42/0.77 % partial match(1): FHUNF-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.42/0.77 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.42/0.77 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.42/0.77 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2016448 completed with status 0
% 0.42/0.77 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.42/0.77 % Preprocessing class: FMLLMMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.42/0.77 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.42/0.77 % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.42/0.77 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.42/0.77 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.42/0.77 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.42/0.77 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.42/0.77 % Search class: FHUNF-FFSM11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.42/0.77 % partial match(1): FHUNF-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.42/0.77 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.42/0.77 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.42/0.77 % Preprocessing time : 0.005 s
% 0.42/0.77
% 0.42/0.77 % Proof found!
% 0.42/0.77 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.42/0.77 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.42/0.77 % Parsed axioms : 8006
% 0.42/0.77 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 7960
% 0.42/0.77 % Initial clauses : 47
% 0.42/0.77 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.42/0.77 % Initial clauses in saturation : 47
% 0.42/0.77 % Processed clauses : 55
% 0.42/0.77 % ...of these trivial : 8
% 0.42/0.77 % ...subsumed : 2
% 0.42/0.77 % ...remaining for further processing : 45
% 0.42/0.77 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.42/0.77 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.42/0.77 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.42/0.77 % Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.42/0.77 % Generated clauses : 23
% 0.42/0.77 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 14
% 0.42/0.77 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.42/0.77 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.42/0.77 % Paramodulations : 23
% 0.42/0.77 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.42/0.77 % NegExts : 0
% 0.42/0.77 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.42/0.77 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.42/0.77 % Total rewrite steps : 22
% 0.42/0.77 % ...of those cached : 10
% 0.42/0.77 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.42/0.77 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.42/0.77 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.42/0.77 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.42/0.77 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.42/0.77 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.42/0.77 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.42/0.77 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.42/0.77 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.42/0.77 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.42/0.77 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.42/0.77 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.42/0.77 % Current number of processed clauses : 44
% 0.42/0.77 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 28
% 0.42/0.77 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.42/0.77 % Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.42/0.77 % Non-unit-clauses : 14
% 0.42/0.77 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 6
% 0.42/0.77 % ...number of literals in the above : 14
% 0.42/0.77 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.42/0.77 % Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.42/0.77 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 17
% 0.42/0.77 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 13
% 0.42/0.77 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 2
% 0.42/0.77 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 16
% 0.42/0.77 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.42/0.77 % BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.42/0.77 % BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.42/0.77 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.42/0.77 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.42/0.77 % Termbank termtop insertions : 52541
% 0.42/0.77 % Search garbage collected termcells : 31076
% 0.42/0.77
% 0.42/0.77 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.42/0.77 % User time : 0.043 s
% 0.42/0.77 % System time : 0.025 s
% 0.42/0.77 % Total time : 0.068 s
% 0.42/0.77 % Maximum resident set size: 20340 pages
% 0.42/0.77
% 0.42/0.77 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.42/0.77 % User time : 0.198 s
% 0.42/0.77 % System time : 0.043 s
% 0.42/0.77 % Total time : 0.240 s
% 0.42/0.77 % Maximum resident set size: 10752 pages
% 0.42/0.77 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------