%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : CSR059+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 03:01:59 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.90s 2.07s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.90s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 19 ( 7 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 34 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 26 ( 11 ~; 8 |; 2 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 12 ( 0 sgn 8 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query159,conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt)
=> borderson(c_georegion_l4_x57_y47,c_georegion_l4_x56_y47) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',query159) ).
fof(ax2_7997,axiom,
! [X21,X22] :
( ( mtvisible(X21)
& genlmt(X21,X22) )
=> mtvisible(X22) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_7997) ).
fof(ax2_489,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member5_mt)
=> borderson(c_georegion_l4_x56_y47,c_georegion_l4_x57_y47) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_489) ).
fof(ax2_2388,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt,c_tptpgeo_member5_mt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_2388) ).
fof(ax2_7642,axiom,
! [X15,X16] :
( borderson(X15,X16)
=> borderson(X16,X15) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_7642) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt)
=> borderson(c_georegion_l4_x57_y47,c_georegion_l4_x56_y47) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query159]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X23,X24] :
( ~ mtvisible(X23)
| ~ genlmt(X23,X24)
| mtvisible(X24) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_7997])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt)
& ~ borderson(c_georegion_l4_x57_y47,c_georegion_l4_x56_y47) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member5_mt)
| borderson(c_georegion_l4_x56_y47,c_georegion_l4_x57_y47) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_489]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( mtvisible(X1)
| ~ genlmt(X2,X1)
| ~ mtvisible(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt,c_tptpgeo_member5_mt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax2_2388]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
fof(c_0_12,plain,
! [X17,X18] :
( ~ borderson(X17,X18)
| borderson(X18,X17) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_7642])]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( borderson(c_georegion_l4_x56_y47,c_georegion_l4_x57_y47)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member5_mt) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member5_mt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11])]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( borderson(X1,X2)
| ~ borderson(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
borderson(c_georegion_l4_x56_y47,c_georegion_l4_x57_y47),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14])]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
~ borderson(c_georegion_l4_x57_y47,c_georegion_l4_x56_y47),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_17]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.14 % Problem : CSR059+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.07/0.15 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.15/0.36 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.15/0.36 % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 11:25:22 EDT 2022
% 0.15/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.90/2.07 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.90/2.07 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.90/2.07 # Preprocessing time : 0.160 s
% 0.90/2.07
% 0.90/2.07 # Proof found!
% 0.90/2.07 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.90/2.07 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.90/2.07 # Proof object total steps : 19
% 0.90/2.07 # Proof object clause steps : 9
% 0.90/2.07 # Proof object formula steps : 10
% 0.90/2.07 # Proof object conjectures : 5
% 0.90/2.07 # Proof object clause conjectures : 2
% 0.90/2.07 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.90/2.07 # Proof object initial clauses used : 6
% 0.90/2.07 # Proof object initial formulas used : 5
% 0.90/2.07 # Proof object generating inferences : 2
% 0.90/2.07 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 5
% 0.90/2.07 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.90/2.07 # Parsed axioms : 8006
% 0.90/2.07 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 7963
% 0.90/2.07 # Initial clauses : 44
% 0.90/2.07 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.90/2.07 # Initial clauses in saturation : 44
% 0.90/2.07 # Processed clauses : 47
% 0.90/2.07 # ...of these trivial : 6
% 0.90/2.07 # ...subsumed : 2
% 0.90/2.07 # ...remaining for further processing : 39
% 0.90/2.07 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.90/2.07 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.90/2.07 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.90/2.07 # Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.90/2.07 # Generated clauses : 41
% 0.90/2.07 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 30
% 0.90/2.07 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.90/2.07 # Paramodulations : 41
% 0.90/2.07 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.90/2.07 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.90/2.07 # Current number of processed clauses : 38
% 0.90/2.07 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 23
% 0.90/2.07 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.90/2.07 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.90/2.07 # Non-unit-clauses : 13
% 0.90/2.07 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 27
% 0.90/2.07 # ...number of literals in the above : 50
% 0.90/2.07 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.90/2.07 # Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.90/2.07 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 13
% 0.90/2.07 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 11
% 0.90/2.07 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 2
% 0.90/2.07 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4
% 0.90/2.07 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.90/2.07 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.90/2.07 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.90/2.07 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.90/2.07 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.90/2.07 # Termbank termtop insertions : 52338
% 0.90/2.07
% 0.90/2.07 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.90/2.07 # User time : 0.145 s
% 0.90/2.07 # System time : 0.016 s
% 0.90/2.07 # Total time : 0.161 s
% 0.90/2.07 # Maximum resident set size: 19680 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------