↑ Up

ET---2.0.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : CSR059+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 03:01:59 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 12.33s 13.50s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 12.33s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   19 (   7 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   34 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   26 (  11   ~;   8   |;   2   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   5  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   4 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   12 (   0 sgn   8   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query209,conjecture,
    ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt)
   => borderson(c_georegion_l4_x57_y47,c_georegion_l4_x56_y47) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',query209) ).

fof(ax3_44208,axiom,
    ! [X22,X23] :
      ( ( mtvisible(X22)
        & genlmt(X22,X23) )
     => mtvisible(X23) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_44208) ).

fof(ax3_6006,axiom,
    ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member5_mt)
   => borderson(c_georegion_l4_x56_y47,c_georegion_l4_x57_y47) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_6006) ).

fof(ax3_11126,axiom,
    genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt,c_tptpgeo_member5_mt),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_11126) ).

fof(ax3_43084,axiom,
    ! [X16,X17] :
      ( borderson(X16,X17)
     => borderson(X17,X16) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_43084) ).

fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt)
     => borderson(c_georegion_l4_x57_y47,c_georegion_l4_x56_y47) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query209]) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X24,X25] :
      ( ~ mtvisible(X24)
      | ~ genlmt(X24,X25)
      | mtvisible(X25) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_44208])]) ).

fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt)
    & ~ borderson(c_georegion_l4_x57_y47,c_georegion_l4_x56_y47) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member5_mt)
    | borderson(c_georegion_l4_x56_y47,c_georegion_l4_x57_y47) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_6006]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( mtvisible(X1)
    | ~ genlmt(X2,X1)
    | ~ mtvisible(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt,c_tptpgeo_member5_mt),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax3_11126]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X18,X19] :
      ( ~ borderson(X18,X19)
      | borderson(X19,X18) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_43084])]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( borderson(c_georegion_l4_x56_y47,c_georegion_l4_x57_y47)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member5_mt) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member5_mt),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11])]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( borderson(X1,X2)
    | ~ borderson(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    borderson(c_georegion_l4_x56_y47,c_georegion_l4_x57_y47),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14])]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ~ borderson(c_georegion_l4_x57_y47,c_georegion_l4_x56_y47),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_17]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : CSR059+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime : Fri Jun 10 02:13:36 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 12.33/13.50  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 12.33/13.50  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 12.33/13.50  # Preprocessing time       : 0.478 s
% 12.33/13.50  
% 12.33/13.50  # Proof found!
% 12.33/13.50  # SZS status Theorem
% 12.33/13.50  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 12.33/13.50  # Proof object total steps             : 19
% 12.33/13.50  # Proof object clause steps            : 9
% 12.33/13.50  # Proof object formula steps           : 10
% 12.33/13.50  # Proof object conjectures             : 5
% 12.33/13.50  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 2
% 12.33/13.50  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 12.33/13.50  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 6
% 12.33/13.50  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 5
% 12.33/13.50  # Proof object generating inferences   : 2
% 12.33/13.50  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 5
% 12.33/13.50  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 12.33/13.50  # Parsed axioms                        : 44217
% 12.33/13.50  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 44170
% 12.33/13.50  # Initial clauses                      : 48
% 12.33/13.50  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 12.33/13.50  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 48
% 12.33/13.50  # Processed clauses                    : 50
% 12.33/13.50  # ...of these trivial                  : 7
% 12.33/13.50  # ...subsumed                          : 4
% 12.33/13.50  # ...remaining for further processing  : 39
% 12.33/13.50  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 12.33/13.50  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 12.33/13.50  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 12.33/13.50  # Backward-rewritten                   : 1
% 12.33/13.50  # Generated clauses                    : 46
% 12.33/13.50  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 35
% 12.33/13.50  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 12.33/13.50  # Paramodulations                      : 46
% 12.33/13.50  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 12.33/13.50  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 12.33/13.50  # Current number of processed clauses  : 38
% 12.33/13.50  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 24
% 12.33/13.50  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 12.33/13.50  #    Negative unit clauses             : 2
% 12.33/13.50  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 12
% 12.33/13.50  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 33
% 12.33/13.50  # ...number of literals in the above   : 61
% 12.33/13.50  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 12.33/13.50  # Current number of archived clauses   : 1
% 12.33/13.50  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 62
% 12.33/13.50  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 57
% 12.33/13.50  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 4
% 12.33/13.50  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3
% 12.33/13.50  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 12.33/13.50  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 1
% 12.33/13.50  # BW rewrite match successes           : 1
% 12.33/13.50  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 12.33/13.50  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 12.33/13.50  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 293343
% 12.33/13.50  
% 12.33/13.50  # -------------------------------------------------
% 12.33/13.50  # User time                : 0.438 s
% 12.33/13.50  # System time              : 0.041 s
% 12.33/13.50  # Total time               : 0.479 s
% 12.33/13.50  # Maximum resident set size: 86392 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------