%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : CSR059+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:47:11 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 10.92s 4.20s
% Output : CNFRefutation 10.92s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 14 ( 8 unt; 0 nHn; 14 RR)
% Number of literals : 22 ( 0 equ; 11 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 8 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_2077,plain,
( borderson(X1,X2)
| ~ borderson(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-y3k2cbfw/input.p',i_0_2077) ).
cnf(i_0_325,plain,
( borderson(c_georegion_l4_x56_y47,c_georegion_l4_x57_y47)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member5_mt) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-y3k2cbfw/input.p',i_0_325) ).
cnf(i_0_2657,negated_conjecture,
~ borderson(c_georegion_l4_x57_y47,c_georegion_l4_x56_y47),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-y3k2cbfw/input.p',i_0_2657) ).
cnf(i_0_2300,plain,
( mtvisible(X1)
| ~ mtvisible(X2)
| ~ genlmt(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-y3k2cbfw/input.p',i_0_2300) ).
cnf(i_0_69,plain,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt,c_tptpgeo_member5_mt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-y3k2cbfw/input.p',i_0_69) ).
cnf(i_0_2658,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-y3k2cbfw/input.p',i_0_2658) ).
cnf(c_0_2665,plain,
( borderson(X1,X2)
| ~ borderson(X2,X1) ),
i_0_2077 ).
cnf(c_0_2666,plain,
( borderson(c_georegion_l4_x56_y47,c_georegion_l4_x57_y47)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member5_mt) ),
i_0_325 ).
cnf(c_0_2667,negated_conjecture,
~ borderson(c_georegion_l4_x57_y47,c_georegion_l4_x56_y47),
i_0_2657 ).
cnf(c_0_2668,plain,
( mtvisible(X1)
| ~ mtvisible(X2)
| ~ genlmt(X2,X1) ),
i_0_2300 ).
cnf(c_0_2669,plain,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt,c_tptpgeo_member5_mt),
i_0_69 ).
cnf(c_0_2670,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt),
i_0_2658 ).
cnf(c_0_2671,plain,
~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member5_mt),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2665,c_0_2666]),c_0_2667]) ).
cnf(c_0_2672,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2668,c_0_2669]),c_0_2670])]),c_0_2671]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13 % Problem : CSR059+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.08/0.14 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.15/0.35 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.15/0.35 % DateTime : Fri Jun 10 02:08:56 EDT 2022
% 0.15/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.47 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.91/1.12 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.91/1.12 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.91/1.12 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.91/1.12 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 10.92/4.20 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y:
% 10.92/4.20 # Version: 2.1pre011
% 10.92/4.20 # Preprocessing time : 0.086 s
% 10.92/4.20
% 10.92/4.20 # Proof found!
% 10.92/4.20 # SZS status Theorem
% 10.92/4.20 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 10.92/4.20 # Proof object total steps : 14
% 10.92/4.20 # Proof object clause steps : 8
% 10.92/4.20 # Proof object formula steps : 6
% 10.92/4.20 # Proof object conjectures : 4
% 10.92/4.20 # Proof object clause conjectures : 2
% 10.92/4.20 # Proof object formula conjectures : 2
% 10.92/4.20 # Proof object initial clauses used : 6
% 10.92/4.20 # Proof object initial formulas used : 6
% 10.92/4.20 # Proof object generating inferences : 2
% 10.92/4.20 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 4
% 10.92/4.20 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 10.92/4.20 # Parsed axioms : 2657
% 10.92/4.20 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 10.92/4.20 # Initial clauses : 2657
% 10.92/4.20 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 10.92/4.20 # Initial clauses in saturation : 2657
% 10.92/4.20 # Processed clauses : 2702
% 10.92/4.20 # ...of these trivial : 74
% 10.92/4.20 # ...subsumed : 85
% 10.92/4.20 # ...remaining for further processing : 2542
% 10.92/4.20 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 2
% 10.92/4.20 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 10.92/4.20 # Backward-subsumed : 3
% 10.92/4.20 # Backward-rewritten : 86
% 10.92/4.20 # Generated clauses : 5743
% 10.92/4.20 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 4859
% 10.92/4.20 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 5
% 10.92/4.20 # Paramodulations : 5741
% 10.92/4.20 # Factorizations : 0
% 10.92/4.20 # Equation resolutions : 2
% 10.92/4.20 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 10.92/4.20 # Propositional unsat check successes : 0
% 10.92/4.20 # Current number of processed clauses : 2451
% 10.92/4.20 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 1301
% 10.92/4.20 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 10.92/4.20 # Negative unit clauses : 24
% 10.92/4.20 # Non-unit-clauses : 1126
% 10.92/4.20 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 4392
% 10.92/4.20 # ...number of literals in the above : 7561
% 10.92/4.20 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 10.92/4.20 # Current number of archived clauses : 89
% 10.92/4.20 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 206938
% 10.92/4.20 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 190369
% 10.92/4.20 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 91
% 10.92/4.20 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 65079
% 10.92/4.20 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 10.92/4.20 # BW rewrite match attempts : 2142
% 10.92/4.20 # BW rewrite match successes : 18
% 10.92/4.20 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 10.92/4.20 # Condensation successes : 0
% 10.92/4.20 # Termbank termtop insertions : 93838
% 10.92/4.20
% 10.92/4.20 # -------------------------------------------------
% 10.92/4.20 # User time : 0.252 s
% 10.92/4.20 # System time : 0.015 s
% 10.92/4.20 # Total time : 0.267 s
% 10.92/4.20 # ...preprocessing : 0.086 s
% 10.92/4.20 # ...main loop : 0.181 s
% 10.92/4.20 # Maximum resident set size: 21952 pages
% 10.92/4.20
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------