%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR059+5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v3.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:16:22 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 23.33s 12.37s
% Output : CNFRefutation 23.33s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 19 ( 7 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 34 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 26 ( 11 ~; 8 |; 2 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 12 ( 0 sgn 8 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query259,conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt)
=> borderson(c_georegion_l4_x57_y47,c_georegion_l4_x56_y47) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query259) ).
fof(ax4_540220,axiom,
! [X28,X29] :
( ( genlmt(X28,X29)
& mtvisible(X28) )
=> mtvisible(X29) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+4.ax',ax4_540220) ).
fof(ax4_27086,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member5_mt)
=> borderson(c_georegion_l4_x56_y47,c_georegion_l4_x57_y47) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+4.ax',ax4_27086) ).
fof(ax4_141295,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt,c_tptpgeo_member5_mt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+4.ax',ax4_141295) ).
fof(ax4_540068,axiom,
! [X23,X27] :
( borderson(X23,X27)
=> borderson(X27,X23) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+4.ax',ax4_540068) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt)
=> borderson(c_georegion_l4_x57_y47,c_georegion_l4_x56_y47) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query259]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X52,X53] :
( mtvisible(X53)
| ~ genlmt(X52,X53)
| ~ mtvisible(X52) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax4_540220])])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
( ~ borderson(c_georegion_l4_x57_y47,c_georegion_l4_x56_y47)
& mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
( borderson(c_georegion_l4_x56_y47,c_georegion_l4_x57_y47)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member5_mt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax4_27086])]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( ~ genlmt(X1,X2)
| ~ mtvisible(X1)
| mtvisible(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt,c_tptpgeo_member5_mt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax4_141295]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
fof(c_0_12,plain,
! [X34,X35] :
( borderson(X35,X34)
| ~ borderson(X34,X35) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax4_540068])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member5_mt)
| borderson(c_georegion_l4_x56_y47,c_georegion_l4_x57_y47) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member5_mt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11])]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ~ borderson(X1,X2)
| borderson(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
borderson(c_georegion_l4_x56_y47,c_georegion_l4_x57_y47),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14])]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
~ borderson(c_georegion_l4_x57_y47,c_georegion_l4_x56_y47),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_17]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : CSR059+5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v3.5.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.54 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.54 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.54 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.54 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.54 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.55 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.55 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.55 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:42:53 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.55 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.55 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/0.58 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.58 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 23.33/12.37 % Version: 3.5.1
% 23.33/12.37 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 23.33/12.37 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 294 seconds (2352 total)
% 23.33/12.37 % Starting new_ho_10 with 588s (2) cores
% 23.33/12.37 % Starting sh3 with 588s (2) cores
% 23.33/12.37 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 588s (2) cores
% 23.33/12.37 % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 588s (2) cores
% 23.33/12.37 % sh3 with pid 2529488 completed with status 0
% 23.33/12.37 % Result found by sh3
% 23.33/12.37 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 23.33/12.37 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 294 seconds (2352 total)
% 23.33/12.37 % Starting new_ho_10 with 588s (2) cores
% 23.33/12.37 % Starting sh3 with 588s (2) cores
% 23.33/12.37 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 23.33/12.37 % SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 23.33/12.37 % Search class: FHHNM-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 23.33/12.37 % partial match(1): FHHNM-SSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 23.33/12.37 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 2 cores with 584 seconds (584 total)
% 23.33/12.37 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 53s (1) cores
% 23.33/12.37 % Starting sh3 with 59s (1) cores
% 23.33/12.37 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2529493 completed with status 0
% 23.33/12.37 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 23.33/12.37 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 23.33/12.37 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 294 seconds (2352 total)
% 23.33/12.37 % Starting new_ho_10 with 588s (2) cores
% 23.33/12.37 % Starting sh3 with 588s (2) cores
% 23.33/12.37 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 23.33/12.37 % SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 23.33/12.37 % Search class: FHHNM-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 23.33/12.37 % partial match(1): FHHNM-SSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 23.33/12.37 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 2 cores with 584 seconds (584 total)
% 23.33/12.37 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 53s (1) cores
% 23.33/12.37 % Preprocessing time : 0.213 s
% 23.33/12.37
% 23.33/12.37 % Proof found!
% 23.33/12.37 % SZS status Theorem
% 23.33/12.37 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 23.33/12.37 % Parsed axioms : 540250
% 23.33/12.37 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 539660
% 23.33/12.37 % Initial clauses : 591
% 23.33/12.37 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 23.33/12.37 % Initial clauses in saturation : 591
% 23.33/12.37 % Processed clauses : 715
% 23.33/12.37 % ...of these trivial : 83
% 23.33/12.37 % ...subsumed : 21
% 23.33/12.37 % ...remaining for further processing : 611
% 23.33/12.37 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 23.33/12.37 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 23.33/12.37 % Backward-subsumed : 1
% 23.33/12.37 % Backward-rewritten : 34
% 23.33/12.37 % Generated clauses : 781
% 23.33/12.37 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 498
% 23.33/12.37 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 23.33/12.37 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 23.33/12.37 % Paramodulations : 781
% 23.33/12.37 % Factorizations : 0
% 23.33/12.37 % NegExts : 0
% 23.33/12.37 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 23.33/12.37 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 23.33/12.37 % Total rewrite steps : 374
% 23.33/12.37 % ...of those cached : 263
% 23.33/12.37 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 23.33/12.37 % Propositional check models : 0
% 23.33/12.37 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 23.33/12.37 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 23.33/12.37 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 23.33/12.37 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 23.33/12.37 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 23.33/12.37 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 23.33/12.37 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 23.33/12.37 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 23.33/12.37 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 23.33/12.37 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 23.33/12.37 % Current number of processed clauses : 576
% 23.33/12.37 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 441
% 23.33/12.37 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 23.33/12.37 % Negative unit clauses : 34
% 23.33/12.37 % Non-unit-clauses : 101
% 23.33/12.37 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 372
% 23.33/12.37 % ...number of literals in the above : 490
% 23.33/12.37 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 23.33/12.37 % Current number of archived clauses : 35
% 23.33/12.37 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2146
% 23.33/12.37 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1717
% 23.33/12.37 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 21
% 23.33/12.37 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1672
% 23.33/12.37 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 23.33/12.37 % BW rewrite match attempts : 36
% 23.33/12.37 % BW rewrite match successes : 28
% 23.33/12.37 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 23.33/12.37 % Condensation successes : 0
% 23.33/12.37 % Termbank termtop insertions : 3700237
% 23.33/12.37 % Search garbage collected termcells : 2173088
% 23.33/12.37
% 23.33/12.37 % -------------------------------------------------
% 23.33/12.37 % User time : 3.333 s
% 23.33/12.37 % System time : 1.531 s
% 23.33/12.37 % Total time : 4.864 s
% 23.33/12.37 % Maximum resident set size: 1242144 pages
% 23.33/12.37
% 23.33/12.37 % -------------------------------------------------
% 23.33/12.37 % User time : 9.522 s
% 23.33/12.37 % System time : 2.172 s
% 23.33/12.37 % Total time : 11.695 s
% 23.33/12.37 % Maximum resident set size: 456960 pages
% 23.33/12.37 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------