%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR059+5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v3.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:18:24 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 29.99s 19.00s
% Output : CNFRefutation 29.99s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 19 ( 7 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 34 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 26 ( 11 ~; 8 |; 2 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 12 ( 0 sgn 8 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query259,conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt)
=> borderson(c_georegion_l4_x57_y47,c_georegion_l4_x56_y47) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query259) ).
fof(ax4_540220,axiom,
! [X28,X29] :
( ( genlmt(X28,X29)
& mtvisible(X28) )
=> mtvisible(X29) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+4.ax',ax4_540220) ).
fof(ax4_27086,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member5_mt)
=> borderson(c_georegion_l4_x56_y47,c_georegion_l4_x57_y47) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+4.ax',ax4_27086) ).
fof(ax4_141295,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt,c_tptpgeo_member5_mt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+4.ax',ax4_141295) ).
fof(ax4_540068,axiom,
! [X23,X27] :
( borderson(X23,X27)
=> borderson(X27,X23) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+4.ax',ax4_540068) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt)
=> borderson(c_georegion_l4_x57_y47,c_georegion_l4_x56_y47) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query259]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X52,X53] :
( mtvisible(X53)
| ~ genlmt(X52,X53)
| ~ mtvisible(X52) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax4_540220])])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
( ~ borderson(c_georegion_l4_x57_y47,c_georegion_l4_x56_y47)
& mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
( borderson(c_georegion_l4_x56_y47,c_georegion_l4_x57_y47)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member5_mt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax4_27086])]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( ~ genlmt(X1,X2)
| ~ mtvisible(X1)
| mtvisible(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt,c_tptpgeo_member5_mt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax4_141295]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
fof(c_0_12,plain,
! [X34,X35] :
( borderson(X35,X34)
| ~ borderson(X34,X35) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax4_540068])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member5_mt)
| borderson(c_georegion_l4_x56_y47,c_georegion_l4_x57_y47) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member5_mt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11])]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ~ borderson(X1,X2)
| borderson(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
borderson(c_georegion_l4_x56_y47,c_georegion_l4_x57_y47),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14])]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
~ borderson(c_georegion_l4_x57_y47,c_georegion_l4_x56_y47),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_17]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : CSR059+5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v3.5.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.38 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.38 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.38 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.38 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.38 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.38 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.38 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.38 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:42:53 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.38 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.43 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.43 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 29.99/19.00 % Version: 3.5.1
% 29.99/19.00 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 29.99/19.00 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 287 seconds (2296 total)
% 29.99/19.00 % Starting new_ho_10 with 574s (2) cores
% 29.99/19.00 % Starting sh3 with 574s (2) cores
% 29.99/19.00 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 574s (2) cores
% 29.99/19.00 % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 574s (2) cores
% 29.99/19.00 % new_ho_10_cnf2 with pid 2529657 completed with status 0
% 29.99/19.00 % Result found by new_ho_10_cnf2
% 29.99/19.00 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 29.99/19.00 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 287 seconds (2296 total)
% 29.99/19.00 % Starting new_ho_10 with 574s (2) cores
% 29.99/19.00 % Starting sh3 with 574s (2) cores
% 29.99/19.00 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 574s (2) cores
% 29.99/19.00 % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 574s (2) cores
% 29.99/19.00 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 29.99/19.00 % SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 29.99/19.00 % Search class: FHHNM-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 29.99/19.00 % partial match(1): FHHNM-SSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 29.99/19.00 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 2 cores with 570 seconds (570 total)
% 29.99/19.00 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 52s (1) cores
% 29.99/19.00 % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 58s (1) cores
% 29.99/19.00 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2529660 completed with status 0
% 29.99/19.00 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 29.99/19.00 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 29.99/19.00 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 287 seconds (2296 total)
% 29.99/19.00 % Starting new_ho_10 with 574s (2) cores
% 29.99/19.00 % Starting sh3 with 574s (2) cores
% 29.99/19.00 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 574s (2) cores
% 29.99/19.00 % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 574s (2) cores
% 29.99/19.00 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 29.99/19.00 % SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 29.99/19.00 % Search class: FHHNM-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 29.99/19.00 % partial match(1): FHHNM-SSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 29.99/19.00 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 2 cores with 570 seconds (570 total)
% 29.99/19.00 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 52s (1) cores
% 29.99/19.00 % Preprocessing time : 0.220 s
% 29.99/19.00
% 29.99/19.00 % Proof found!
% 29.99/19.00 % SZS status Theorem
% 29.99/19.00 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 29.99/19.00 % Parsed axioms : 540250
% 29.99/19.00 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 539660
% 29.99/19.00 % Initial clauses : 591
% 29.99/19.00 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 29.99/19.00 % Initial clauses in saturation : 591
% 29.99/19.00 % Processed clauses : 715
% 29.99/19.00 % ...of these trivial : 83
% 29.99/19.00 % ...subsumed : 21
% 29.99/19.00 % ...remaining for further processing : 611
% 29.99/19.00 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 29.99/19.00 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 29.99/19.00 % Backward-subsumed : 1
% 29.99/19.00 % Backward-rewritten : 34
% 29.99/19.00 % Generated clauses : 781
% 29.99/19.00 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 498
% 29.99/19.00 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 29.99/19.00 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 29.99/19.00 % Paramodulations : 781
% 29.99/19.00 % Factorizations : 0
% 29.99/19.00 % NegExts : 0
% 29.99/19.00 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 29.99/19.00 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 29.99/19.00 % Total rewrite steps : 374
% 29.99/19.00 % ...of those cached : 263
% 29.99/19.00 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 29.99/19.00 % Propositional check models : 0
% 29.99/19.00 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 29.99/19.00 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 29.99/19.00 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 29.99/19.00 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 29.99/19.00 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 29.99/19.00 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 29.99/19.00 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 29.99/19.00 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 29.99/19.00 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 29.99/19.00 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 29.99/19.00 % Current number of processed clauses : 576
% 29.99/19.00 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 441
% 29.99/19.00 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 29.99/19.00 % Negative unit clauses : 34
% 29.99/19.00 % Non-unit-clauses : 101
% 29.99/19.00 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 372
% 29.99/19.00 % ...number of literals in the above : 490
% 29.99/19.00 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 29.99/19.00 % Current number of archived clauses : 35
% 29.99/19.00 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2146
% 29.99/19.00 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1717
% 29.99/19.00 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 21
% 29.99/19.00 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1671
% 29.99/19.00 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 29.99/19.00 % BW rewrite match attempts : 36
% 29.99/19.00 % BW rewrite match successes : 28
% 29.99/19.00 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 29.99/19.00 % Condensation successes : 0
% 29.99/19.00 % Termbank termtop insertions : 3700237
% 29.99/19.00 % Search garbage collected termcells : 2173088
% 29.99/19.00
% 29.99/19.00 % -------------------------------------------------
% 29.99/19.00 % User time : 3.194 s
% 29.99/19.00 % System time : 1.607 s
% 29.99/19.00 % Total time : 4.801 s
% 29.99/19.00 % Maximum resident set size: 1242144 pages
% 29.99/19.00
% 29.99/19.00 % -------------------------------------------------
% 29.99/19.00 % User time : 16.136 s
% 29.99/19.00 % System time : 2.406 s
% 29.99/19.00 % Total time : 18.542 s
% 29.99/19.00 % Maximum resident set size: 456704 pages
% 29.99/19.00 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------