%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR059+6 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:16:22 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.15s 134.45s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 19 ( 7 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 34 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 26 ( 11 ~; 8 |; 2 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 12 ( 0 sgn 8 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query309,conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt)
=> borderson(c_georegion_l4_x57_y47,c_georegion_l4_x56_y47) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query309) ).
fof(ax5_3342125,axiom,
! [X32,X33] :
( ( genlmt(X32,X33)
& mtvisible(X32) )
=> mtvisible(X33) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+5.ax',ax5_3342125) ).
fof(ax5_666925,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member5_mt)
=> borderson(c_georegion_l4_x56_y47,c_georegion_l4_x57_y47) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+5.ax',ax5_666925) ).
fof(ax5_44462,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt,c_tptpgeo_member5_mt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+5.ax',ax5_44462) ).
fof(ax5_1553473,axiom,
! [X2,X3] :
( borderson(X2,X3)
=> borderson(X3,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+5.ax',ax5_1553473) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt)
=> borderson(c_georegion_l4_x57_y47,c_georegion_l4_x56_y47) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query309]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X81,X82] :
( mtvisible(X82)
| ~ genlmt(X81,X82)
| ~ mtvisible(X81) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax5_3342125])])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
( ~ borderson(c_georegion_l4_x57_y47,c_georegion_l4_x56_y47)
& mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
( borderson(c_georegion_l4_x56_y47,c_georegion_l4_x57_y47)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member5_mt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax5_666925])]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( ~ genlmt(X1,X2)
| ~ mtvisible(X1)
| mtvisible(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt,c_tptpgeo_member5_mt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax5_44462]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
fof(c_0_12,plain,
! [X36,X37] :
( borderson(X37,X36)
| ~ borderson(X36,X37) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax5_1553473])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member5_mt)
| borderson(c_georegion_l4_x56_y47,c_georegion_l4_x57_y47) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member5_mt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11])]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ~ borderson(X1,X2)
| borderson(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
borderson(c_georegion_l4_x56_y47,c_georegion_l4_x57_y47),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14])]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
~ borderson(c_georegion_l4_x57_y47,c_georegion_l4_x56_y47),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_17]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : CSR059+6 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.3.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.36 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:39:48 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/134.45 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.15/134.45 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/134.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 192 seconds (1536 total)
% 0.15/134.45 % Starting new_ho_10 with 384s (2) cores
% 0.15/134.45 % Starting sh3 with 384s (2) cores
% 0.15/134.45 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 384s (2) cores
% 0.15/134.45 % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 384s (2) cores
% 0.15/134.45 % new_ho_10_cnf2 with pid 3751643 completed with status 0
% 0.15/134.45 % Result found by new_ho_10_cnf2
% 0.15/134.45 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/134.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 192 seconds (1536 total)
% 0.15/134.45 % Starting new_ho_10 with 384s (2) cores
% 0.15/134.45 % Starting sh3 with 384s (2) cores
% 0.15/134.45 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 384s (2) cores
% 0.15/134.45 % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 384s (2) cores
% 0.15/134.45 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.15/134.45 % SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.15/134.45 % Search class: FHHSM-SMLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.15/134.45 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 2 cores with 369 seconds (369 total)
% 0.15/134.45 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 34s (1) cores
% 0.15/134.45 % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 37s (1) cores
% 0.15/134.45 % new_ho_10_cnf2 with pid 3751646 completed with status 0
% 0.15/134.45 % Result found by new_ho_10_cnf2
% 0.15/134.45 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/134.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 192 seconds (1536 total)
% 0.15/134.45 % Starting new_ho_10 with 384s (2) cores
% 0.15/134.45 % Starting sh3 with 384s (2) cores
% 0.15/134.45 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 384s (2) cores
% 0.15/134.45 % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 384s (2) cores
% 0.15/134.45 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.15/134.45 % SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.15/134.45 % Search class: FHHSM-SMLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.15/134.45 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 2 cores with 369 seconds (369 total)
% 0.15/134.45 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 34s (1) cores
% 0.15/134.45 % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 37s (1) cores
% 0.15/134.45 % Preprocessing time : 1.973 s
% 0.15/134.45 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.15/134.45
% 0.15/134.45 % Proof found!
% 0.15/134.45 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.15/134.45 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/134.45 % Parsed axioms : 3341978
% 0.15/134.45 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 3329008
% 0.15/134.45 % Initial clauses : 12971
% 0.15/134.45 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 2
% 0.15/134.45 % Initial clauses in saturation : 12969
% 0.15/134.45 % Processed clauses : 17888
% 0.15/134.45 % ...of these trivial : 2268
% 0.15/134.45 % ...subsumed : 115
% 0.15/134.45 % ...remaining for further processing : 15505
% 0.15/134.45 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 0.15/134.45 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.15/134.45 % Backward-subsumed : 5
% 0.15/134.45 % Backward-rewritten : 251
% 0.15/134.45 % Generated clauses : 3341
% 0.15/134.45 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2736
% 0.15/134.45 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.15/134.45 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.15/134.45 % Paramodulations : 3340
% 0.15/134.45 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.15/134.45 % NegExts : 0
% 0.15/134.45 % Equation resolutions : 1
% 0.15/134.45 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.15/134.45 % Total rewrite steps : 3480
% 0.15/134.45 % ...of those cached : 1409
% 0.15/134.45 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.15/134.45 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.15/134.45 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/134.45 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.15/134.45 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/134.45 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.15/134.45 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.15/134.45 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/134.45 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/134.45 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.15/134.45 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/134.45 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/134.45 % Current number of processed clauses : 4218
% 0.15/134.45 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 2641
% 0.15/134.45 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/134.45 % Negative unit clauses : 533
% 0.15/134.45 % Non-unit-clauses : 1044
% 0.15/134.45 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 8735
% 0.15/134.45 % ...number of literals in the above : 12026
% 0.15/134.45 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.15/134.45 % Current number of archived clauses : 11286
% 0.15/134.45 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 728246
% 0.15/134.45 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 653919
% 0.15/134.45 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 115
% 0.15/134.45 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 265325
% 0.15/134.45 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.15/134.45 % BW rewrite match attempts : 21407
% 0.15/134.45 % BW rewrite match successes : 71
% 0.15/134.45 % Condensation attempts : 18118
% 0.15/134.45 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.15/134.45 % Termbank termtop insertions : 22445698
% 0.15/134.45 % Search garbage collected termcells : 10477792
% 0.15/134.45
% 0.15/134.45 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/134.45 % User time : 17.331 s
% 0.15/134.45 % System time : 5.145 s
% 0.15/134.45 % Total time : 22.476 s
% 0.15/134.45 % Maximum resident set size: 5020612 pages
% 0.15/134.45
% 0.15/134.45 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/134.45 % User time : 126.881 s
% 0.15/134.45 % System time : 11.551 s
% 0.15/134.45 % Total time : 138.431 s
% 0.15/134.45 % Maximum resident set size: 2273536 pages
% 0.15/134.45 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------