%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR059-10 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:18:23 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.30s 0.63s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.30s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 23 ( 23 unt; 0 nHn; 15 RR)
% Number of literals : 23 ( 22 equ; 3 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 12 ( 12 usr; 7 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 20 ( 4 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(ax2_7997,axiom,
ifeq4(genlmt(X1,X2),true,ifeq4(mtvisible(X1),true,mtvisible(X2),true),true) = true,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax2_7997) ).
cnf(ax2_2388,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt,c_tptpgeo_member5_mt) = true,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax2_2388) ).
cnf(query159,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt) = true,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query159) ).
cnf(ifeq_axiom,axiom,
ifeq4(X1,X1,X2,X3) = X2,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ifeq_axiom) ).
cnf(ax2_489,axiom,
ifeq4(mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member5_mt),true,borderson(c_georegion_l4_x56_y47,c_georegion_l4_x57_y47),true) = true,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax2_489) ).
cnf(ax2_7642,axiom,
ifeq4(borderson(X1,X2),true,borderson(X2,X1),true) = true,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax2_7642) ).
cnf(goal,negated_conjecture,
a != b,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goal) ).
cnf(query159_1,negated_conjecture,
ifeq3(borderson(c_georegion_l4_x57_y47,c_georegion_l4_x56_y47),true,a,b) = b,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query159_1) ).
cnf(ifeq_axiom_001,axiom,
ifeq3(X1,X1,X2,X3) = X2,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ifeq_axiom_001) ).
cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
ifeq4(genlmt(X1,X2),true,ifeq4(mtvisible(X1),true,mtvisible(X2),true),true) = true,
ax2_7997 ).
cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt,c_tptpgeo_member5_mt) = true,
ax2_2388 ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindlecollectormt) = true,
query159 ).
cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
ifeq4(X1,X1,X2,X3) = X2,
ifeq_axiom ).
cnf(c_0_13,axiom,
ifeq4(mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member5_mt),true,borderson(c_georegion_l4_x56_y47,c_georegion_l4_x57_y47),true) = true,
ax2_489 ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member5_mt) = true,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11]),c_0_12]),c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
ifeq4(borderson(X1,X2),true,borderson(X2,X1),true) = true,
ax2_7642 ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
borderson(c_georegion_l4_x56_y47,c_georegion_l4_x57_y47) = true,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
a != b,
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[goal]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
ifeq3(borderson(c_georegion_l4_x57_y47,c_georegion_l4_x56_y47),true,a,b) = b,
query159_1 ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
borderson(c_georegion_l4_x57_y47,c_georegion_l4_x56_y47) = true,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,axiom,
ifeq3(X1,X1,X2,X3) = X2,
ifeq_axiom_001 ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
a != b,
c_0_17 ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_20]),c_0_21]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : CSR059-10 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.37 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:39:05 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.38 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.30/0.63 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.30/0.63 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.30/0.63 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.30/0.63 % Starting new_bool_3 with 900s (3) cores
% 0.30/0.63 % Starting new_bool_1 with 900s (3) cores
% 0.30/0.63 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.30/0.63 % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 300s (1) cores
% 0.30/0.63 % new_bool_1 with pid 1007093 completed with status 0
% 0.30/0.63 % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.30/0.63 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.30/0.63 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.30/0.63 % Starting new_bool_3 with 900s (3) cores
% 0.30/0.63 % Starting new_bool_1 with 900s (3) cores
% 0.30/0.63 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.30/0.63 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.30/0.63 % Search class: FUUPM-FFMM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.30/0.63 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 3 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
% 0.30/0.63 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 91s (1) cores
% 0.30/0.63 % Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 541s (1) cores
% 0.30/0.63 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 91s (1) cores
% 0.30/0.63 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 1007100 completed with status 0
% 0.30/0.63 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.30/0.63 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.30/0.63 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.30/0.63 % Starting new_bool_3 with 900s (3) cores
% 0.30/0.63 % Starting new_bool_1 with 900s (3) cores
% 0.30/0.63 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.30/0.63 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.30/0.63 % Search class: FUUPM-FFMM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.30/0.63 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 3 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
% 0.30/0.63 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 91s (1) cores
% 0.30/0.63 % Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 541s (1) cores
% 0.30/0.63 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 91s (1) cores
% 0.30/0.63 % Preprocessing time : 0.007 s
% 0.30/0.63 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.30/0.63
% 0.30/0.63 % Proof found!
% 0.30/0.63 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.30/0.63 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.30/0.63 % Parsed axioms : 8012
% 0.30/0.63 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 7962
% 0.30/0.63 % Initial clauses : 50
% 0.30/0.63 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.30/0.63 % Initial clauses in saturation : 50
% 0.30/0.63 % Processed clauses : 92
% 0.30/0.63 % ...of these trivial : 9
% 0.30/0.63 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.30/0.63 % ...remaining for further processing : 83
% 0.30/0.63 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.30/0.63 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.30/0.63 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.30/0.63 % Backward-rewritten : 2
% 0.30/0.63 % Generated clauses : 30
% 0.30/0.63 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 26
% 0.30/0.63 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.30/0.63 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.30/0.63 % Paramodulations : 30
% 0.30/0.63 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.30/0.63 % NegExts : 0
% 0.30/0.63 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.30/0.63 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.30/0.63 % Total rewrite steps : 52
% 0.30/0.63 % ...of those cached : 17
% 0.30/0.63 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.30/0.63 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.30/0.63 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.30/0.63 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.30/0.63 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.30/0.63 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.30/0.63 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.30/0.63 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.30/0.63 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.30/0.63 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.30/0.63 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.30/0.63 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.30/0.63 % Current number of processed clauses : 40
% 0.30/0.63 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 39
% 0.30/0.63 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.30/0.63 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.30/0.63 % Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.30/0.63 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 25
% 0.30/0.63 % ...number of literals in the above : 25
% 0.30/0.63 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.30/0.63 % Current number of archived clauses : 43
% 0.30/0.63 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.30/0.63 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.30/0.63 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.30/0.63 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.30/0.63 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.30/0.63 % BW rewrite match attempts : 27
% 0.30/0.63 % BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.30/0.63 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.30/0.63 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.30/0.63 % Termbank termtop insertions : 59255
% 0.30/0.63 % Search garbage collected termcells : 23356
% 0.30/0.63
% 0.30/0.63 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.30/0.63 % User time : 0.035 s
% 0.30/0.63 % System time : 0.030 s
% 0.30/0.63 % Total time : 0.066 s
% 0.30/0.63 % Maximum resident set size: 19204 pages
% 0.30/0.63
% 0.30/0.63 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.30/0.63 % User time : 0.175 s
% 0.30/0.63 % System time : 0.057 s
% 0.30/0.63 % Total time : 0.232 s
% 0.30/0.63 % Maximum resident set size: 10496 pages
% 0.30/0.63 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------