↑ Up

SPASS---3.9.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : CSR060+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 23:24:51 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.12s 0.37s
% Output   : Refutation 0.12s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.05/0.09  % Problem  : CSR060+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.05/0.09  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.08/0.28  % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.28  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.28  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.28  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.08/0.28  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.08/0.28  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.28  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.08/0.28  % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 00:47:09 EDT 2022
% 0.08/0.28  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.12/0.37  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.12/0.37  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.12/0.37  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.12/0.37  SPASS derived 139 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 143 clauses.
% 0.12/0.37  SPASS allocated 97820 KBytes.
% 0.12/0.37  SPASS spent	0:00:00.07 on the problem.
% 0.12/0.37  		0:00:00.03 for the input.
% 0.12/0.37  		0:00:00.02 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.12/0.37  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.12/0.37  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.12/0.37  		0:00:00.00 for the reduction.
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  Here is a proof with depth 2, length 33 :
% 0.12/0.37  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.12/0.37  5[0:Inp] ||  -> genlmt(c_ldscdemonstrationspindleheadmt,c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric)*l.
% 0.12/0.37  8[0:Inp] ||  -> genlmt(c_machinelearningspindleheadmt,c_miptdatabase19681997_termsmt)*l.
% 0.12/0.37  10[0:Inp] ||  -> genlmt(c_miptdatabase19681997_termsmt,c_ldscgeneralcollectormt)*l.
% 0.12/0.37  11[0:Inp] ||  -> genlmt(c_ldscgeneralcollectormt,c_ldscdemonstrationspindleheadmt)*r.
% 0.12/0.37  14[0:Inp] ||  -> uniformresourcelocator(f_urlfn(u))*.
% 0.12/0.37  15[0:Inp] ||  -> computerdataartifact(f_urlreferentfn(u))*.
% 0.12/0.37  19[0:Inp] ||  -> microtheory(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(u,v))*.
% 0.12/0.37  24[0:Inp] ||  -> mtvisible(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwsurgerydoorcoukmedconsprintasprecno23068988)),c_translation_0_885))*.
% 0.12/0.37  25[0:Inp] ||  -> isa(c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtofnshipobjectfoundinlocationcityofbostonma_802,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma))*.
% 0.12/0.37  43[0:Inp] || isa(u,c_tptpcol_16_27189)* -> tptpcol_16_27189(u).
% 0.12/0.37  64[0:Inp] tptpcol_16_27189(u) || tptp_9_51(u,c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtofnshipobjectfoundinlocationcityofbostonma_802)* -> .
% 0.12/0.37  65[0:Inp] ||  -> genlmt(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwsurgerydoorcoukmedconsprintasprecno23068988)),c_translation_0_885),c_machinelearningspindleheadmt)*l.
% 0.12/0.37  80[0:Inp] mtvisible(u) || genlmt(u,v)*+ -> mtvisible(v)*.
% 0.12/0.37  81[0:Inp] || mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric) -> relationexistsall(c_tptp_9_51,c_tptpcol_16_27189,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma))*.
% 0.12/0.37  93[0:Inp] || genlmt(u,v)* genlmt(v,w)* -> genlmt(u,w)*.
% 0.12/0.37  95[0:Inp] || isa(u,v) relationexistsall(w,x,v) -> isa(f_relationexistsallfn(u,w,x,v),x)*.
% 0.12/0.37  96[0:Inp] || mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric) isa(u,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma)) -> tptp_9_51(f_relationexistsallfn(u,c_tptp_9_51,c_tptpcol_16_27189,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma)),u)*.
% 0.12/0.37  150[0:OCh:93.1,93.0,5.0,11.0] ||  -> genlmt(c_ldscgeneralcollectormt,c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric)*r.
% 0.12/0.37  218[0:Res:8.0,80.1] mtvisible(c_machinelearningspindleheadmt) ||  -> mtvisible(c_miptdatabase19681997_termsmt)*.
% 0.12/0.37  221[0:Res:10.0,80.1] mtvisible(c_miptdatabase19681997_termsmt) ||  -> mtvisible(c_ldscgeneralcollectormt)*.
% 0.12/0.37  227[0:Res:150.0,80.1] mtvisible(c_ldscgeneralcollectormt) ||  -> mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric)*.
% 0.12/0.37  229[0:Res:65.0,80.1] mtvisible(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwsurgerydoorcoukmedconsprintasprecno23068988)),c_translation_0_885)) ||  -> mtvisible(c_machinelearningspindleheadmt)*.
% 0.12/0.37  243[0:SSi:229.0,24.0,19.0,15.0,14.0] ||  -> mtvisible(c_machinelearningspindleheadmt)*.
% 0.12/0.37  245[0:MRR:218.0,243.0] ||  -> mtvisible(c_miptdatabase19681997_termsmt)*.
% 0.12/0.37  247[0:MRR:221.0,245.0] ||  -> mtvisible(c_ldscgeneralcollectormt)*.
% 0.12/0.37  249[0:MRR:227.0,247.0] ||  -> mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric)*.
% 0.12/0.37  251[0:MRR:81.0,249.0] ||  -> relationexistsall(c_tptp_9_51,c_tptpcol_16_27189,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma))*.
% 0.12/0.37  254[0:MRR:96.0,249.0] || isa(u,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma)) -> tptp_9_51(f_relationexistsallfn(u,c_tptp_9_51,c_tptpcol_16_27189,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma)),u)*.
% 0.12/0.37  271[0:Res:95.2,43.0] || isa(u,v) relationexistsall(w,c_tptpcol_16_27189,v) -> tptpcol_16_27189(f_relationexistsallfn(u,w,c_tptpcol_16_27189,v))*.
% 0.12/0.37  277[0:Res:254.1,64.1] tptpcol_16_27189(f_relationexistsallfn(c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtofnshipobjectfoundinlocationcityofbostonma_802,c_tptp_9_51,c_tptpcol_16_27189,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma))) || isa(c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtofnshipobjectfoundinlocationcityofbostonma_802,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma))* -> .
% 0.12/0.37  278[0:MRR:277.1,25.0] tptpcol_16_27189(f_relationexistsallfn(c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtofnshipobjectfoundinlocationcityofbostonma_802,c_tptp_9_51,c_tptpcol_16_27189,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma))) ||  -> .
% 0.12/0.37  280[0:SoR:278.0,271.2] || relationexistsall(c_tptp_9_51,c_tptpcol_16_27189,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma))* isa(c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtofnshipobjectfoundinlocationcityofbostonma_802,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma)) -> .
% 0.12/0.37  281[0:MRR:280.0,280.1,251.0,25.0] ||  -> .
% 0.12/0.37  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.12/0.37  Formulae used in the proof : just1 just5 just8 just9 just77 just80 just84 query60 just15 just53 just4 just86 just14 just91 just6 just13
% 0.12/0.37  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------