%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : CSR060+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:47:12 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 17.06s 3.80s
% Output : CNFRefutation 17.06s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 9
% Number of leaves : 13
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 38 ( 22 unt; 0 nHn; 38 RR)
% Number of literals : 60 ( 0 equ; 27 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 6 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 18 ( 18 usr; 13 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 20 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_129,plain,
( mtvisible(X1)
| ~ mtvisible(X2)
| ~ genlmt(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-fsx8676u/input.p',i_0_129) ).
cnf(i_0_283,plain,
genlmt(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwsurgerydoorcoukmedconsprintasprecno23068988)),c_translation_0_885),c_machinelearningspindleheadmt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-fsx8676u/input.p',i_0_283) ).
cnf(i_0_1066,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwsurgerydoorcoukmedconsprintasprecno23068988)),c_translation_0_885)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-fsx8676u/input.p',i_0_1066) ).
cnf(i_0_633,plain,
genlmt(c_machinelearningspindleheadmt,c_miptdatabase19681997_termsmt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-fsx8676u/input.p',i_0_633) ).
cnf(i_0_577,plain,
genlmt(c_miptdatabase19681997_termsmt,c_ldscgeneralcollectormt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-fsx8676u/input.p',i_0_577) ).
cnf(i_0_640,plain,
genlmt(c_ldscdemonstrationspindleheadmt,c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-fsx8676u/input.p',i_0_640) ).
cnf(i_0_938,plain,
genlmt(c_ldscgeneralcollectormt,c_ldscdemonstrationspindleheadmt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-fsx8676u/input.p',i_0_938) ).
cnf(i_0_1065,negated_conjecture,
( ~ tptpcol_16_27189(X1)
| ~ tptp_9_51(X1,c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtofnshipobjectfoundinlocationcityofbostonma_802) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-fsx8676u/input.p',i_0_1065) ).
cnf(i_0_656,plain,
( tptpcol_16_27189(X1)
| ~ isa(X1,c_tptpcol_16_27189) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-fsx8676u/input.p',i_0_656) ).
cnf(i_0_349,plain,
( tptp_9_51(f_relationexistsallfn(X1,c_tptp_9_51,c_tptpcol_16_27189,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma)),X1)
| ~ mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric)
| ~ isa(X1,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-fsx8676u/input.p',i_0_349) ).
cnf(i_0_260,plain,
isa(c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtofnshipobjectfoundinlocationcityofbostonma_802,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-fsx8676u/input.p',i_0_260) ).
cnf(i_0_350,plain,
( relationexistsall(c_tptp_9_51,c_tptpcol_16_27189,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma))
| ~ mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-fsx8676u/input.p',i_0_350) ).
cnf(i_0_691,plain,
( isa(f_relationexistsallfn(X1,X2,X3,X4),X3)
| ~ isa(X1,X4)
| ~ relationexistsall(X2,X3,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-fsx8676u/input.p',i_0_691) ).
cnf(c_0_1080,plain,
( mtvisible(X1)
| ~ mtvisible(X2)
| ~ genlmt(X2,X1) ),
i_0_129 ).
cnf(c_0_1081,plain,
genlmt(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwsurgerydoorcoukmedconsprintasprecno23068988)),c_translation_0_885),c_machinelearningspindleheadmt),
i_0_283 ).
cnf(c_0_1082,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwsurgerydoorcoukmedconsprintasprecno23068988)),c_translation_0_885)),
i_0_1066 ).
cnf(c_0_1083,plain,
genlmt(c_machinelearningspindleheadmt,c_miptdatabase19681997_termsmt),
i_0_633 ).
cnf(c_0_1084,plain,
mtvisible(c_machinelearningspindleheadmt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1080,c_0_1081]),c_0_1082])]) ).
cnf(c_0_1085,plain,
genlmt(c_miptdatabase19681997_termsmt,c_ldscgeneralcollectormt),
i_0_577 ).
cnf(c_0_1086,plain,
mtvisible(c_miptdatabase19681997_termsmt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1080,c_0_1083]),c_0_1084])]) ).
cnf(c_0_1087,plain,
genlmt(c_ldscdemonstrationspindleheadmt,c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric),
i_0_640 ).
cnf(c_0_1088,plain,
genlmt(c_ldscgeneralcollectormt,c_ldscdemonstrationspindleheadmt),
i_0_938 ).
cnf(c_0_1089,plain,
mtvisible(c_ldscgeneralcollectormt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1080,c_0_1085]),c_0_1086])]) ).
cnf(c_0_1090,negated_conjecture,
( ~ tptpcol_16_27189(X1)
| ~ tptp_9_51(X1,c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtofnshipobjectfoundinlocationcityofbostonma_802) ),
i_0_1065 ).
cnf(c_0_1091,plain,
( tptpcol_16_27189(X1)
| ~ isa(X1,c_tptpcol_16_27189) ),
i_0_656 ).
cnf(c_0_1092,plain,
( mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric)
| ~ mtvisible(c_ldscdemonstrationspindleheadmt) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1080,c_0_1087]) ).
cnf(c_0_1093,plain,
mtvisible(c_ldscdemonstrationspindleheadmt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1080,c_0_1088]),c_0_1089])]) ).
cnf(c_0_1094,negated_conjecture,
( ~ tptp_9_51(X1,c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtofnshipobjectfoundinlocationcityofbostonma_802)
| ~ isa(X1,c_tptpcol_16_27189) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1090,c_0_1091]) ).
cnf(c_0_1095,plain,
( tptp_9_51(f_relationexistsallfn(X1,c_tptp_9_51,c_tptpcol_16_27189,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma)),X1)
| ~ mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric)
| ~ isa(X1,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma)) ),
i_0_349 ).
cnf(c_0_1096,plain,
isa(c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtofnshipobjectfoundinlocationcityofbostonma_802,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma)),
i_0_260 ).
cnf(c_0_1097,plain,
( relationexistsall(c_tptp_9_51,c_tptpcol_16_27189,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma))
| ~ mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric) ),
i_0_350 ).
cnf(c_0_1098,plain,
mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_1092,c_0_1093])]) ).
cnf(c_0_1099,plain,
( ~ isa(f_relationexistsallfn(c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtofnshipobjectfoundinlocationcityofbostonma_802,c_tptp_9_51,c_tptpcol_16_27189,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma)),c_tptpcol_16_27189)
| ~ mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1094,c_0_1095]),c_0_1096])]) ).
cnf(c_0_1100,plain,
( isa(f_relationexistsallfn(X1,X2,X3,X4),X3)
| ~ isa(X1,X4)
| ~ relationexistsall(X2,X3,X4) ),
i_0_691 ).
cnf(c_0_1101,plain,
relationexistsall(c_tptp_9_51,c_tptpcol_16_27189,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_1097,c_0_1098])]) ).
cnf(c_0_1102,plain,
~ isa(f_relationexistsallfn(c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtofnshipobjectfoundinlocationcityofbostonma_802,c_tptp_9_51,c_tptpcol_16_27189,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma)),c_tptpcol_16_27189),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_1099,c_0_1098])]) ).
cnf(c_0_1103,plain,
( isa(f_relationexistsallfn(X1,c_tptp_9_51,c_tptpcol_16_27189,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma)),c_tptpcol_16_27189)
| ~ isa(X1,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1100,c_0_1101]) ).
cnf(c_0_1104,plain,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1102,c_0_1103]),c_0_1096])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12 % Problem : CSR060+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 07:25:15 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.45 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.19/0.48 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.48 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.19/0.48 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.19/0.48 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 17.06/3.80 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN:
% 17.06/3.80 # Version: 2.1pre011
% 17.06/3.80 # Preprocessing time : 0.033 s
% 17.06/3.80
% 17.06/3.80 # Proof found!
% 17.06/3.80 # SZS status Theorem
% 17.06/3.80 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 17.06/3.80 # Proof object total steps : 38
% 17.06/3.80 # Proof object clause steps : 25
% 17.06/3.80 # Proof object formula steps : 13
% 17.06/3.80 # Proof object conjectures : 5
% 17.06/3.80 # Proof object clause conjectures : 3
% 17.06/3.80 # Proof object formula conjectures : 2
% 17.06/3.80 # Proof object initial clauses used : 13
% 17.06/3.80 # Proof object initial formulas used : 13
% 17.06/3.80 # Proof object generating inferences : 9
% 17.06/3.80 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 18
% 17.06/3.80 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 17.06/3.80 # Parsed axioms : 1066
% 17.06/3.80 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 17.06/3.80 # Initial clauses : 1066
% 17.06/3.80 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 17.06/3.80 # Initial clauses in saturation : 1066
% 17.06/3.80 # Processed clauses : 7752
% 17.06/3.80 # ...of these trivial : 369
% 17.06/3.80 # ...subsumed : 1334
% 17.06/3.80 # ...remaining for further processing : 6049
% 17.06/3.80 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 17.06/3.80 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 17.06/3.80 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 17.06/3.80 # Backward-rewritten : 6
% 17.06/3.80 # Generated clauses : 16402
% 17.06/3.80 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 14384
% 17.06/3.80 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 17.06/3.80 # Paramodulations : 16402
% 17.06/3.80 # Factorizations : 0
% 17.06/3.80 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 17.06/3.80 # Propositional unsat checks : 1
% 17.06/3.80 # Propositional unsat check successes : 0
% 17.06/3.80 # Current number of processed clauses : 6043
% 17.06/3.80 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 1438
% 17.06/3.80 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 17.06/3.80 # Negative unit clauses : 1997
% 17.06/3.80 # Non-unit-clauses : 2608
% 17.06/3.80 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 7685
% 17.06/3.80 # ...number of literals in the above : 13191
% 17.06/3.80 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 17.06/3.80 # Current number of archived clauses : 6
% 17.06/3.80 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1489653
% 17.06/3.80 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1287784
% 17.06/3.80 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 183
% 17.06/3.80 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2434730
% 17.06/3.80 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 17.06/3.80 # BW rewrite match attempts : 5
% 17.06/3.80 # BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 17.06/3.80 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 17.06/3.80 # Condensation successes : 0
% 17.06/3.80 # Termbank termtop insertions : 134982
% 17.06/3.80
% 17.06/3.80 # -------------------------------------------------
% 17.06/3.80 # User time : 0.854 s
% 17.06/3.80 # System time : 0.017 s
% 17.06/3.80 # Total time : 0.871 s
% 17.06/3.80 # ...preprocessing : 0.033 s
% 17.06/3.80 # ...main loop : 0.838 s
% 17.06/3.80 # Maximum resident set size: 25784 pages
% 17.06/3.80
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------