%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : CSR060+6 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:47:13 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 78.85s 69.65s
% Output : CNFRefutation 78.85s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 11
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 30 ( 16 unt; 0 nHn; 30 RR)
% Number of literals : 50 ( 0 equ; 24 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 6 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 16 ( 16 usr; 11 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 20 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_2587,plain,
( mtvisible(X1)
| ~ mtvisible(X2)
| ~ genlmt(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ue0n86tt/input.p',i_0_2587) ).
cnf(i_0_3198,plain,
genlmt(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwsurgerydoorcoukmedconsprintasprecno23068988)),c_translation_0_885),c_machinelearningspindleheadmt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ue0n86tt/input.p',i_0_3198) ).
cnf(i_0_3341,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwsurgerydoorcoukmedconsprintasprecno23068988)),c_translation_0_885)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ue0n86tt/input.p',i_0_3341) ).
cnf(i_0_1660,plain,
genlmt(c_machinelearningspindleheadmt,c_analystdatabasemt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ue0n86tt/input.p',i_0_1660) ).
cnf(i_0_18,plain,
genlmt(c_analystdatabasemt,c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ue0n86tt/input.p',i_0_18) ).
cnf(i_0_3340,negated_conjecture,
( ~ tptpcol_16_27189(X1)
| ~ tptp_9_51(X1,c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtofnshipobjectfoundinlocationcityofbostonma_802) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ue0n86tt/input.p',i_0_3340) ).
cnf(i_0_1930,plain,
( tptpcol_16_27189(X1)
| ~ isa(X1,c_tptpcol_16_27189) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ue0n86tt/input.p',i_0_1930) ).
cnf(i_0_1691,plain,
( tptp_9_51(f_relationexistsallfn(X1,c_tptp_9_51,c_tptpcol_16_27189,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma)),X1)
| ~ mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric)
| ~ isa(X1,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ue0n86tt/input.p',i_0_1691) ).
cnf(i_0_53,plain,
isa(c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtofnshipobjectfoundinlocationcityofbostonma_802,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ue0n86tt/input.p',i_0_53) ).
cnf(i_0_1692,plain,
( relationexistsall(c_tptp_9_51,c_tptpcol_16_27189,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma))
| ~ mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ue0n86tt/input.p',i_0_1692) ).
cnf(i_0_3016,plain,
( isa(f_relationexistsallfn(X1,X2,X3,X4),X3)
| ~ isa(X1,X4)
| ~ relationexistsall(X2,X3,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ue0n86tt/input.p',i_0_3016) ).
cnf(c_0_3353,plain,
( mtvisible(X1)
| ~ mtvisible(X2)
| ~ genlmt(X2,X1) ),
i_0_2587 ).
cnf(c_0_3354,plain,
genlmt(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwsurgerydoorcoukmedconsprintasprecno23068988)),c_translation_0_885),c_machinelearningspindleheadmt),
i_0_3198 ).
cnf(c_0_3355,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwsurgerydoorcoukmedconsprintasprecno23068988)),c_translation_0_885)),
i_0_3341 ).
cnf(c_0_3356,plain,
genlmt(c_machinelearningspindleheadmt,c_analystdatabasemt),
i_0_1660 ).
cnf(c_0_3357,plain,
mtvisible(c_machinelearningspindleheadmt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3353,c_0_3354]),c_0_3355])]) ).
cnf(c_0_3358,plain,
genlmt(c_analystdatabasemt,c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric),
i_0_18 ).
cnf(c_0_3359,plain,
mtvisible(c_analystdatabasemt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3353,c_0_3356]),c_0_3357])]) ).
cnf(c_0_3360,negated_conjecture,
( ~ tptpcol_16_27189(X1)
| ~ tptp_9_51(X1,c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtofnshipobjectfoundinlocationcityofbostonma_802) ),
i_0_3340 ).
cnf(c_0_3361,plain,
( tptpcol_16_27189(X1)
| ~ isa(X1,c_tptpcol_16_27189) ),
i_0_1930 ).
cnf(c_0_3362,plain,
( tptp_9_51(f_relationexistsallfn(X1,c_tptp_9_51,c_tptpcol_16_27189,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma)),X1)
| ~ mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric)
| ~ isa(X1,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma)) ),
i_0_1691 ).
cnf(c_0_3363,plain,
mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3353,c_0_3358]),c_0_3359])]) ).
cnf(c_0_3364,negated_conjecture,
( ~ tptp_9_51(X1,c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtofnshipobjectfoundinlocationcityofbostonma_802)
| ~ isa(X1,c_tptpcol_16_27189) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3360,c_0_3361]) ).
cnf(c_0_3365,plain,
( tptp_9_51(f_relationexistsallfn(X1,c_tptp_9_51,c_tptpcol_16_27189,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma)),X1)
| ~ isa(X1,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_3362,c_0_3363])]) ).
cnf(c_0_3366,plain,
isa(c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtofnshipobjectfoundinlocationcityofbostonma_802,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma)),
i_0_53 ).
cnf(c_0_3367,plain,
( relationexistsall(c_tptp_9_51,c_tptpcol_16_27189,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma))
| ~ mtvisible(c_currentworlddatacollectormt_nonhomocentric) ),
i_0_1692 ).
cnf(c_0_3368,negated_conjecture,
~ isa(f_relationexistsallfn(c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtofnshipobjectfoundinlocationcityofbostonma_802,c_tptp_9_51,c_tptpcol_16_27189,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma)),c_tptpcol_16_27189),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3364,c_0_3365]),c_0_3366])]) ).
cnf(c_0_3369,plain,
( isa(f_relationexistsallfn(X1,X2,X3,X4),X3)
| ~ isa(X1,X4)
| ~ relationexistsall(X2,X3,X4) ),
i_0_3016 ).
cnf(c_0_3370,plain,
relationexistsall(c_tptp_9_51,c_tptpcol_16_27189,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtofn(c_ship,c_objectfoundinlocation,c_cityofbostonma)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_3367,c_0_3363])]) ).
cnf(c_0_3371,plain,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3368,c_0_3369]),c_0_3370]),c_0_3366])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11 % Problem : CSR060+6 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.3.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 16:59:28 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 65.77/66.01 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 65.77/66.01 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 65.77/66.01 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 65.77/66.01 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 78.85/69.65 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y:
% 78.85/69.65 # Version: 2.1pre011
% 78.85/69.65 # Preprocessing time : 0.075 s
% 78.85/69.65
% 78.85/69.65 # Proof found!
% 78.85/69.65 # SZS status Theorem
% 78.85/69.65 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 78.85/69.65 # Proof object total steps : 30
% 78.85/69.65 # Proof object clause steps : 19
% 78.85/69.65 # Proof object formula steps : 11
% 78.85/69.65 # Proof object conjectures : 6
% 78.85/69.65 # Proof object clause conjectures : 4
% 78.85/69.65 # Proof object formula conjectures : 2
% 78.85/69.65 # Proof object initial clauses used : 11
% 78.85/69.65 # Proof object initial formulas used : 11
% 78.85/69.65 # Proof object generating inferences : 6
% 78.85/69.65 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 15
% 78.85/69.65 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 78.85/69.65 # Parsed axioms : 3339
% 78.85/69.65 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 78.85/69.65 # Initial clauses : 3339
% 78.85/69.65 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 78.85/69.65 # Initial clauses in saturation : 3339
% 78.85/69.65 # Processed clauses : 4746
% 78.85/69.65 # ...of these trivial : 368
% 78.85/69.65 # ...subsumed : 165
% 78.85/69.65 # ...remaining for further processing : 4213
% 78.85/69.65 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 9
% 78.85/69.65 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 78.85/69.65 # Backward-subsumed : 4
% 78.85/69.65 # Backward-rewritten : 176
% 78.85/69.65 # Generated clauses : 8036
% 78.85/69.65 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 6803
% 78.85/69.65 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 78.85/69.65 # Paramodulations : 8027
% 78.85/69.65 # Factorizations : 0
% 78.85/69.65 # Equation resolutions : 9
% 78.85/69.65 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 78.85/69.65 # Propositional unsat check successes : 0
% 78.85/69.65 # Current number of processed clauses : 4024
% 78.85/69.65 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 2629
% 78.85/69.65 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 78.85/69.65 # Negative unit clauses : 432
% 78.85/69.65 # Non-unit-clauses : 963
% 78.85/69.65 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 4409
% 78.85/69.65 # ...number of literals in the above : 7481
% 78.85/69.65 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 78.85/69.65 # Current number of archived clauses : 180
% 78.85/69.65 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 296074
% 78.85/69.65 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 152659
% 78.85/69.65 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 119
% 78.85/69.65 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 391548
% 78.85/69.65 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 78.85/69.65 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1900
% 78.85/69.65 # BW rewrite match successes : 79
% 78.85/69.65 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 78.85/69.65 # Condensation successes : 0
% 78.85/69.65 # Termbank termtop insertions : 114048
% 78.85/69.65
% 78.85/69.65 # -------------------------------------------------
% 78.85/69.65 # User time : 0.443 s
% 78.85/69.65 # System time : 0.010 s
% 78.85/69.65 # Total time : 0.453 s
% 78.85/69.65 # ...preprocessing : 0.075 s
% 78.85/69.65 # ...main loop : 0.379 s
% 78.85/69.65 # Maximum resident set size: 29100 pages
% 78.85/69.65
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------