%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR061+6 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:16:23 PM UTC 2026
% Result : ContradictoryAxioms 0.15s 136.19s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 13 ( 7 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 19 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 13 ( 7 ~; 4 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 1 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 12 ( 2 sgn 8 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(ax5_1518354,axiom,
! [X2,X3] :
( natfunction(X2,X3)
=> reifiablefunction(X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+5.ax',ax5_1518354) ).
fof(ax5_3337714,axiom,
! [X2] : natfunction(f_intervalstartedbyfn(X2),c_intervalstartedbyfn),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+5.ax',ax5_3337714) ).
fof(ax5_1083425,axiom,
! [X1] :
~ ( unreifiablefunction(X1)
& reifiablefunction(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+5.ax',ax5_1083425) ).
fof(ax5_1272299,axiom,
unreifiablefunction(c_intervalstartedbyfn),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+5.ax',ax5_1272299) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
! [X829,X830] :
( reifiablefunction(X830)
| ~ natfunction(X829,X830) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax5_1518354])])]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X281] : natfunction(f_intervalstartedbyfn(X281),c_intervalstartedbyfn),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[ax5_3337714]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X1256] :
( ~ unreifiablefunction(X1256)
| ~ reifiablefunction(X1256) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax5_1083425])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( ~ natfunction(X1,X2)
| reifiablefunction(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
natfunction(f_intervalstartedbyfn(X1),c_intervalstartedbyfn),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( ~ unreifiablefunction(X1)
| ~ reifiablefunction(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
reifiablefunction(c_intervalstartedbyfn),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
unreifiablefunction(c_intervalstartedbyfn),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax5_1272299]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : CSR061+6 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.3.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.36 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:40:06 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/0.36 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.09/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/136.19 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.15/136.19 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/136.19 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 201 seconds (1608 total)
% 0.15/136.19 % Starting new_ho_10 with 402s (2) cores
% 0.15/136.19 % Starting sh3 with 402s (2) cores
% 0.15/136.19 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 402s (2) cores
% 0.15/136.19 % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 402s (2) cores
% 0.15/136.19 % new_ho_10_cnf2 with pid 1009568 completed with status 0
% 0.15/136.19 % Result found by new_ho_10_cnf2
% 0.15/136.19 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/136.19 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 201 seconds (1608 total)
% 0.15/136.19 % Starting new_ho_10 with 402s (2) cores
% 0.15/136.19 % Starting sh3 with 402s (2) cores
% 0.15/136.19 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 402s (2) cores
% 0.15/136.19 % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 402s (2) cores
% 0.15/136.19 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.15/136.19 % SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.15/136.19 % Search class: FHHSM-SMLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.15/136.19 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 2 cores with 385 seconds (385 total)
% 0.15/136.19 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 35s (1) cores
% 0.15/136.19 % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 39s (1) cores
% 0.15/136.19 % new_ho_10_cnf2 with pid 1009723 completed with status 0
% 0.15/136.19 % Result found by new_ho_10_cnf2
% 0.15/136.19 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/136.19 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 201 seconds (1608 total)
% 0.15/136.19 % Starting new_ho_10 with 402s (2) cores
% 0.15/136.19 % Starting sh3 with 402s (2) cores
% 0.15/136.19 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 402s (2) cores
% 0.15/136.19 % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 402s (2) cores
% 0.15/136.19 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.15/136.19 % SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.15/136.19 % Search class: FHHSM-SMLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.15/136.19 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 2 cores with 385 seconds (385 total)
% 0.15/136.19 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 35s (1) cores
% 0.15/136.19 % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 39s (1) cores
% 0.15/136.19 % Preprocessing time : 2.233 s
% 0.15/136.19 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.15/136.19
% 0.15/136.19 % Proof found!
% 0.15/136.19 % SZS status ContradictoryAxioms
% 0.15/136.19 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/136.19 % Parsed axioms : 3341978
% 0.15/136.19 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 3321977
% 0.15/136.19 % Initial clauses : 20002
% 0.15/136.19 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 2
% 0.15/136.19 % Initial clauses in saturation : 20000
% 0.15/136.19 % Processed clauses : 32641
% 0.15/136.19 % ...of these trivial : 2881
% 0.15/136.19 % ...subsumed : 438
% 0.15/136.19 % ...remaining for further processing : 29322
% 0.15/136.19 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 0.15/136.19 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.15/136.19 % Backward-subsumed : 3
% 0.15/136.19 % Backward-rewritten : 787
% 0.15/136.19 % Generated clauses : 10783
% 0.15/136.19 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 8264
% 0.15/136.19 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.15/136.19 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.15/136.19 % Paramodulations : 10782
% 0.15/136.19 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.15/136.19 % NegExts : 0
% 0.15/136.19 % Equation resolutions : 1
% 0.15/136.19 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.15/136.19 % Total rewrite steps : 6094
% 0.15/136.19 % ...of those cached : 3129
% 0.15/136.19 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.15/136.19 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.15/136.19 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/136.19 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.15/136.19 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/136.19 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.15/136.19 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.15/136.19 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/136.19 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/136.19 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.15/136.19 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/136.19 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/136.19 % Current number of processed clauses : 11017
% 0.15/136.19 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 6072
% 0.15/136.19 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/136.19 % Negative unit clauses : 1708
% 0.15/136.19 % Non-unit-clauses : 3237
% 0.15/136.19 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 13137
% 0.15/136.19 % ...number of literals in the above : 20168
% 0.15/136.19 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.15/136.19 % Current number of archived clauses : 18304
% 0.15/136.19 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 3447297
% 0.15/136.19 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2989431
% 0.15/136.19 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 254
% 0.15/136.19 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2988855
% 0.15/136.19 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.15/136.19 % BW rewrite match attempts : 33741
% 0.15/136.19 % BW rewrite match successes : 782
% 0.15/136.19 % Condensation attempts : 32649
% 0.15/136.19 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.15/136.19 % Termbank termtop insertions : 22755673
% 0.15/136.19 % Search garbage collected termcells : 10472532
% 0.15/136.19
% 0.15/136.19 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/136.19 % User time : 25.101 s
% 0.15/136.19 % System time : 5.968 s
% 0.15/136.19 % Total time : 31.069 s
% 0.15/136.19 % Maximum resident set size: 5021684 pages
% 0.15/136.19
% 0.15/136.19 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/136.19 % User time : 131.680 s
% 0.15/136.19 % System time : 13.745 s
% 0.15/136.19 % Total time : 145.426 s
% 0.15/136.19 % Maximum resident set size: 2273280 pages
% 0.15/136.19 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------