↑ Up

SPASS---3.9.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : CSR062+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 23:24:52 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.22s 0.45s
% Output   : Refutation 0.22s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.13  % Problem  : CSR062+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Thu Jun  9 17:54:23 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.22/0.45  
% 0.22/0.45  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.22/0.45  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.22/0.45  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.22/0.45  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.22/0.45  SPASS derived 32 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 76 clauses.
% 0.22/0.45  SPASS allocated 97718 KBytes.
% 0.22/0.45  SPASS spent	0:00:00.09 on the problem.
% 0.22/0.45  		0:00:00.03 for the input.
% 0.22/0.45  		0:00:00.03 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.22/0.45  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.22/0.45  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.22/0.45  		0:00:00.00 for the reduction.
% 0.22/0.45  
% 0.22/0.45  
% 0.22/0.45  Here is a proof with depth 2, length 18 :
% 0.22/0.45  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.22/0.45  1[0:Inp] ||  -> mtvisible(c_tptp_member3205_mt)*.
% 0.22/0.45  12[0:Inp] ||  -> genlmt(c_tptp_spindleheadmt,c_cyclistsmt)*r.
% 0.22/0.45  13[0:Inp] ||  -> genlmt(c_tptp_member3205_mt,c_tptp_spindleheadmt)*r.
% 0.22/0.45  14[0:Inp] || tptptypes_5_387(u,c_pushingwithfingers)*+ -> .
% 0.22/0.45  15[0:Inp] || mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt)+ -> tptptypes_8_390(c_pushingwithfingers,c_tptpcol_15_4027)*.
% 0.22/0.45  50[0:Inp] || tptptypes_6_388(u,v)+ -> tptptypes_5_387(u,v)*.
% 0.22/0.45  51[0:Inp] || tptptypes_7_389(u,v)+ -> tptptypes_6_388(v,u)*.
% 0.22/0.45  52[0:Inp] || tptptypes_8_390(u,v)+ -> tptptypes_7_389(u,v)*.
% 0.22/0.45  54[0:Inp] mtvisible(u) || genlmt(u,v)* -> mtvisible(v)*.
% 0.22/0.45  62[0:Inp] || genlmt(u,v)* genlmt(v,w)* -> genlmt(u,w)*.
% 0.22/0.45  64[0:Res:1.0,54.0] || genlmt(c_tptp_member3205_mt,u)+ -> mtvisible(u)*.
% 0.22/0.45  65[0:Res:50.1,14.0] || tptptypes_6_388(u,c_pushingwithfingers)*+ -> .
% 0.22/0.45  110[0:NCh:62.2,62.1,64.0,12.0] || genlmt(c_tptp_member3205_mt,c_tptp_spindleheadmt) -> mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt)*.
% 0.22/0.45  115[0:MRR:110.0,13.0] ||  -> mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt)*.
% 0.22/0.45  116[0:MRR:15.0,115.0] ||  -> tptptypes_8_390(c_pushingwithfingers,c_tptpcol_15_4027)*.
% 0.22/0.45  117[0:Res:116.0,52.0] ||  -> tptptypes_7_389(c_pushingwithfingers,c_tptpcol_15_4027)*.
% 0.22/0.45  121[0:Res:117.0,51.0] ||  -> tptptypes_6_388(c_tptpcol_15_4027,c_pushingwithfingers)*.
% 0.22/0.45  124[0:MRR:121.0,65.0] ||  -> .
% 0.22/0.45  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.22/0.45  Formulae used in the proof : query62 just12 just13 just14 just7 just9 just11 just53 just58
% 0.22/0.45  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------