%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem : CSR062+4 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 5 04:14:38 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 75.22s 44.20s
% Output : CNFRefutation 75.22s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 30 ( 12 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 51 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 38 ( 17 ~; 12 |; 2 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 7 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 6 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 5 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 30 ( 3 sgn 17 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query212,conjecture,
? [X2] :
( mtvisible(c_tptp_member3205_mt)
=> tptptypes_5_387(X2,c_pushingwithfingers) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query212) ).
fof(ax3_44208,axiom,
! [X22,X23] :
( ( mtvisible(X22)
& genlmt(X22,X23) )
=> mtvisible(X23) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_44208) ).
fof(ax3_6288,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptp_member3205_mt,c_tptp_spindleheadmt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_6288) ).
fof(ax3_11372,axiom,
! [X2,X3] :
( tptptypes_6_388(X2,X3)
=> tptptypes_5_387(X2,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_11372) ).
fof(ax3_11228,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt)
=> tptptypes_8_390(c_pushingwithfingers,c_tptpcol_15_4027) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_11228) ).
fof(ax3_86,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptp_spindleheadmt,c_cyclistsmt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_86) ).
fof(ax3_6493,axiom,
! [X2,X3] :
( tptptypes_7_389(X2,X3)
=> tptptypes_6_388(X3,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_6493) ).
fof(ax3_10910,axiom,
! [X2,X3] :
( tptptypes_8_390(X2,X3)
=> tptptypes_7_389(X2,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_10910) ).
fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X2] :
( mtvisible(c_tptp_member3205_mt)
=> tptptypes_5_387(X2,c_pushingwithfingers) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query212]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X48100,X48101] :
( ~ mtvisible(X48100)
| ~ genlmt(X48100,X48101)
| mtvisible(X48101) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_44208])]) ).
fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
! [X48115] :
( mtvisible(c_tptp_member3205_mt)
& ~ tptptypes_5_387(X48115,c_pushingwithfingers) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( mtvisible(X2)
| ~ mtvisible(X1)
| ~ genlmt(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
genlmt(c_tptp_member3205_mt,c_tptp_spindleheadmt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax3_6288]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptp_member3205_mt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
fof(c_0_14,plain,
! [X26565,X26566] :
( ~ tptptypes_6_388(X26565,X26566)
| tptptypes_5_387(X26565,X26566) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_11372])]) ).
fof(c_0_15,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt)
| tptptypes_8_390(c_pushingwithfingers,c_tptpcol_15_4027) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_11228]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
genlmt(c_tptp_spindleheadmt,c_cyclistsmt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax3_86]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
mtvisible(c_tptp_spindleheadmt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_13])]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
~ tptptypes_5_387(X1,c_pushingwithfingers),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( tptptypes_5_387(X1,X2)
| ~ tptptypes_6_388(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
fof(c_0_20,plain,
! [X25487,X25488] :
( ~ tptptypes_7_389(X25487,X25488)
| tptptypes_6_388(X25488,X25487) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_6493])]) ).
fof(c_0_21,plain,
! [X26460,X26461] :
( ~ tptptypes_8_390(X26460,X26461)
| tptptypes_7_389(X26460,X26461) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_10910])]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( tptptypes_8_390(c_pushingwithfingers,c_tptpcol_15_4027)
| ~ mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_16]),c_0_17])]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
~ tptptypes_6_388(X1,c_pushingwithfingers),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( tptptypes_6_388(X2,X1)
| ~ tptptypes_7_389(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( tptptypes_7_389(X1,X2)
| ~ tptptypes_8_390(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
tptptypes_8_390(c_pushingwithfingers,c_tptpcol_15_4027),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23])]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
~ tptptypes_7_389(c_pushingwithfingers,X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_28]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.13 % Problem : CSR062+4 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.16/0.34 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.16/0.34 % DateTime : Mon May 4 16:39:08 EDT 2026
% 0.16/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.36 % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 71.79/40.83 % Warning 104: No lemmas were extracted from the log file '/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/output/initial_lemmas_CSE.log'. Continuing with baseline prover only.
% 75.22/44.20 % Version : CSE_E---1.7
% 75.22/44.20 % Problem : theBenchmark.p
% 75.22/44.20 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 75.22/44.20 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 75.22/44.24 % Total time : 42.301s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------