%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR062+4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:16:24 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.92s 1.46s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.92s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 30 ( 11 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 52 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 41 ( 19 ~; 13 |; 2 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 7 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 6 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 5 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 30 ( 3 sgn 17 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query212,conjecture,
? [X2] :
( mtvisible(c_tptp_member3205_mt)
=> tptptypes_5_387(X2,c_pushingwithfingers) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query212) ).
fof(ax3_11372,axiom,
! [X2,X3] :
( tptptypes_6_388(X2,X3)
=> tptptypes_5_387(X2,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_11372) ).
fof(ax3_6493,axiom,
! [X2,X3] :
( tptptypes_7_389(X2,X3)
=> tptptypes_6_388(X3,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_6493) ).
fof(ax3_10910,axiom,
! [X2,X3] :
( tptptypes_8_390(X2,X3)
=> tptptypes_7_389(X2,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_10910) ).
fof(ax3_11228,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt)
=> tptptypes_8_390(c_pushingwithfingers,c_tptpcol_15_4027) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_11228) ).
fof(ax3_44208,axiom,
! [X22,X23] :
( ( genlmt(X22,X23)
& mtvisible(X22) )
=> mtvisible(X23) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_44208) ).
fof(ax3_6288,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptp_member3205_mt,c_tptp_spindleheadmt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_6288) ).
fof(ax3_86,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptp_spindleheadmt,c_cyclistsmt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_86) ).
fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X2] :
( mtvisible(c_tptp_member3205_mt)
=> tptptypes_5_387(X2,c_pushingwithfingers) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query212]) ).
fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
! [X24] :
( ~ tptptypes_5_387(X24,c_pushingwithfingers)
& mtvisible(c_tptp_member3205_mt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])])]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X27,X28] :
( tptptypes_5_387(X27,X28)
| ~ tptptypes_6_388(X27,X28) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_11372])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
~ tptptypes_5_387(X1,c_pushingwithfingers),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( ~ tptptypes_6_388(X1,X2)
| tptptypes_5_387(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
fof(c_0_13,plain,
! [X43,X44] :
( tptptypes_6_388(X44,X43)
| ~ tptptypes_7_389(X43,X44) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_6493])])]) ).
fof(c_0_14,plain,
! [X61,X62] :
( tptptypes_7_389(X61,X62)
| ~ tptptypes_8_390(X61,X62) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_10910])])]) ).
fof(c_0_15,plain,
( tptptypes_8_390(c_pushingwithfingers,c_tptpcol_15_4027)
| ~ mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_11228])]) ).
fof(c_0_16,plain,
! [X37,X38] :
( mtvisible(X38)
| ~ genlmt(X37,X38)
| ~ mtvisible(X37) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_44208])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
~ tptptypes_6_388(X1,c_pushingwithfingers),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( ~ tptptypes_7_389(X1,X2)
| tptptypes_6_388(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( ~ tptptypes_8_390(X1,X2)
| tptptypes_7_389(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt)
| tptptypes_8_390(c_pushingwithfingers,c_tptpcol_15_4027) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( ~ genlmt(X1,X2)
| ~ mtvisible(X1)
| mtvisible(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
genlmt(c_tptp_member3205_mt,c_tptp_spindleheadmt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax3_6288]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptp_member3205_mt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
~ tptptypes_7_389(c_pushingwithfingers,X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt)
| tptptypes_7_389(c_pushingwithfingers,c_tptpcol_15_4027) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
genlmt(c_tptp_spindleheadmt,c_cyclistsmt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax3_86]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
mtvisible(c_tptp_spindleheadmt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),c_0_23])]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
~ mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_26]),c_0_27])]),c_0_28]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : CSR062+4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.35 % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.35 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.35 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.08/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:43:16 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.08/0.35 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/0.39 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.39 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.92/1.46 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.92/1.46 % Preprocessing class: FMLLLMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.92/1.46 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.92/1.46 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.92/1.46 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.92/1.46 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.92/1.46 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.92/1.46 % sh5l with pid 3533346 completed with status 0
% 0.92/1.46 % Result found by sh5l
% 0.92/1.46 % Preprocessing class: FMLLLMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.92/1.46 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.92/1.46 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.92/1.46 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.92/1.46 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.92/1.46 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.92/1.46 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.92/1.46 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.92/1.46 % Search class: FHUNM-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.92/1.46 % partial match(2): FHHNM-SSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.92/1.46 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.92/1.46 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.92/1.46 % SubtermCWHack with pid 3533347 completed with status 0
% 0.92/1.46 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.92/1.46 % Preprocessing class: FMLLLMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.92/1.46 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.92/1.46 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.92/1.46 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.92/1.46 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.92/1.46 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.92/1.46 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.92/1.46 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.92/1.46 % Search class: FHUNM-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.92/1.46 % partial match(2): FHHNM-SSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.92/1.46 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.92/1.46 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.92/1.46 % Preprocessing time : 0.023 s
% 0.92/1.46
% 0.92/1.46 % Proof found!
% 0.92/1.46 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.92/1.46 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.92/1.46 % Parsed axioms : 44217
% 0.92/1.46 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 43920
% 0.92/1.46 % Initial clauses : 298
% 0.92/1.46 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.92/1.46 % Initial clauses in saturation : 298
% 0.92/1.46 % Processed clauses : 292
% 0.92/1.46 % ...of these trivial : 25
% 0.92/1.46 % ...subsumed : 14
% 0.92/1.46 % ...remaining for further processing : 252
% 0.92/1.46 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.92/1.46 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.92/1.46 % Backward-subsumed : 4
% 0.92/1.46 % Backward-rewritten : 5
% 0.92/1.46 % Generated clauses : 132
% 0.92/1.46 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 102
% 0.92/1.46 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.92/1.46 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.92/1.46 % Paramodulations : 132
% 0.92/1.46 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.92/1.46 % NegExts : 0
% 0.92/1.46 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.92/1.46 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.92/1.46 % Total rewrite steps : 55
% 0.92/1.46 % ...of those cached : 26
% 0.92/1.46 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.92/1.46 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.92/1.46 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.92/1.46 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.92/1.46 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.92/1.46 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.92/1.46 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.92/1.46 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.92/1.46 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.92/1.46 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.92/1.46 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.92/1.46 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.92/1.46 % Current number of processed clauses : 243
% 0.92/1.46 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 130
% 0.92/1.46 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.92/1.46 % Negative unit clauses : 4
% 0.92/1.46 % Non-unit-clauses : 109
% 0.92/1.46 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 108
% 0.92/1.46 % ...number of literals in the above : 185
% 0.92/1.46 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.92/1.46 % Current number of archived clauses : 9
% 0.92/1.46 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1200
% 0.92/1.46 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1195
% 0.92/1.46 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 11
% 0.92/1.46 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 111
% 0.92/1.46 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.92/1.46 % BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 0.92/1.46 % BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.92/1.46 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.92/1.46 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.92/1.46 % Termbank termtop insertions : 302846
% 0.92/1.46 % Search garbage collected termcells : 157661
% 0.92/1.46
% 0.92/1.46 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.92/1.46 % User time : 0.132 s
% 0.92/1.46 % System time : 0.099 s
% 0.92/1.46 % Total time : 0.232 s
% 0.92/1.46 % Maximum resident set size: 84532 pages
% 0.92/1.46
% 0.92/1.46 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.92/1.46 % User time : 0.876 s
% 0.92/1.46 % System time : 0.146 s
% 0.92/1.46 % Total time : 1.022 s
% 0.92/1.46 % Maximum resident set size: 38144 pages
% 0.92/1.46 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------