%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR062+5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v3.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:16:24 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.30s 23.99s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.30s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 31 ( 13 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 52 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 38 ( 17 ~; 12 |; 2 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 7 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 6 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 5 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 30 ( 3 sgn 17 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query262,conjecture,
? [X2] :
( mtvisible(c_tptp_member3205_mt)
=> tptptypes_5_387(X2,c_pushingwithfingers) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query262) ).
fof(ax4_540220,axiom,
! [X28,X29] :
( ( genlmt(X28,X29)
& mtvisible(X28) )
=> mtvisible(X29) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+4.ax',ax4_540220) ).
fof(ax4_239118,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptp_member3205_mt,c_tptp_spindleheadmt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+4.ax',ax4_239118) ).
fof(ax4_61642,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt)
=> tptptypes_8_390(c_pushingwithfingers,c_tptpcol_15_4027) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+4.ax',ax4_61642) ).
fof(ax4_71548,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptp_spindleheadmt,c_cyclistsmt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+4.ax',ax4_71548) ).
fof(ax4_56790,axiom,
! [X2,X3] :
( tptptypes_6_388(X2,X3)
=> tptptypes_5_387(X2,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+4.ax',ax4_56790) ).
fof(ax4_104527,axiom,
! [X2,X3] :
( tptptypes_8_390(X2,X3)
=> tptptypes_7_389(X2,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+4.ax',ax4_104527) ).
fof(ax4_16164,axiom,
! [X2,X3] :
( tptptypes_7_389(X2,X3)
=> tptptypes_6_388(X3,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+4.ax',ax4_16164) ).
fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X2] :
( mtvisible(c_tptp_member3205_mt)
=> tptptypes_5_387(X2,c_pushingwithfingers) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query262]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X79,X80] :
( mtvisible(X80)
| ~ genlmt(X79,X80)
| ~ mtvisible(X79) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax4_540220])])]) ).
fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
! [X30] :
( ~ tptptypes_5_387(X30,c_pushingwithfingers)
& mtvisible(c_tptp_member3205_mt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ genlmt(X1,X2)
| ~ mtvisible(X1)
| mtvisible(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
genlmt(c_tptp_member3205_mt,c_tptp_spindleheadmt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax4_239118]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptp_member3205_mt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
fof(c_0_14,plain,
( tptptypes_8_390(c_pushingwithfingers,c_tptpcol_15_4027)
| ~ mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax4_61642])]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
genlmt(c_tptp_spindleheadmt,c_cyclistsmt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax4_71548]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
mtvisible(c_tptp_spindleheadmt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_13])]) ).
fof(c_0_17,plain,
! [X31,X32] :
( tptptypes_5_387(X31,X32)
| ~ tptptypes_6_388(X31,X32) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax4_56790])])]) ).
fof(c_0_18,plain,
! [X61,X62] :
( tptptypes_7_389(X61,X62)
| ~ tptptypes_8_390(X61,X62) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax4_104527])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt)
| tptptypes_8_390(c_pushingwithfingers,c_tptpcol_15_4027) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_15]),c_0_16])]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
~ tptptypes_5_387(X1,c_pushingwithfingers),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( ~ tptptypes_6_388(X1,X2)
| tptptypes_5_387(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).
fof(c_0_23,plain,
! [X43,X44] :
( tptptypes_6_388(X44,X43)
| ~ tptptypes_7_389(X43,X44) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax4_16164])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( ~ tptptypes_8_390(X1,X2)
| tptptypes_7_389(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
tptptypes_8_390(c_pushingwithfingers,c_tptpcol_15_4027),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20])]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
~ tptptypes_6_388(X1,c_pushingwithfingers),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( ~ tptptypes_7_389(X1,X2)
| tptptypes_6_388(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
tptptypes_7_389(c_pushingwithfingers,c_tptpcol_15_4027),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
~ tptptypes_7_389(c_pushingwithfingers,X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04 % Problem : CSR062+5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v3.5.0.
% 0.00/0.07 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.22/0.45 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.22/0.45 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.22/0.45 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.22/0.45 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.22/0.45 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.22/0.45 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.22/0.45 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.22/0.45 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:41:10 UTC 2026
% 0.22/0.46 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/0.46 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.24/0.52 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.24/0.53 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.30/23.99 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.30/23.99 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.30/23.99 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 282 seconds (2256 total)
% 0.30/23.99 % Starting new_ho_10 with 564s (2) cores
% 0.30/23.99 % Starting sh3 with 564s (2) cores
% 0.30/23.99 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 564s (2) cores
% 0.30/23.99 % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 564s (2) cores
% 0.30/23.99 % new_ho_10_cnf2 with pid 2167421 completed with status 0
% 0.30/23.99 % Result found by new_ho_10_cnf2
% 0.30/23.99 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.30/23.99 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 282 seconds (2256 total)
% 0.30/23.99 % Starting new_ho_10 with 564s (2) cores
% 0.30/23.99 % Starting sh3 with 564s (2) cores
% 0.30/23.99 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 564s (2) cores
% 0.30/23.99 % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 564s (2) cores
% 0.30/23.99 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.30/23.99 % SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.30/23.99 % Search class: FHHNM-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.30/23.99 % partial match(1): FHHNM-SSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.30/23.99 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 2 cores with 561 seconds (561 total)
% 0.30/23.99 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 51s (1) cores
% 0.30/23.99 % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 57s (1) cores
% 0.30/23.99 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2167422 completed with status 0
% 0.30/23.99 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.30/23.99 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.30/23.99 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 282 seconds (2256 total)
% 0.30/23.99 % Starting new_ho_10 with 564s (2) cores
% 0.30/23.99 % Starting sh3 with 564s (2) cores
% 0.30/23.99 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 564s (2) cores
% 0.30/23.99 % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 564s (2) cores
% 0.30/23.99 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.30/23.99 % SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.30/23.99 % Search class: FHHNM-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.30/23.99 % partial match(1): FHHNM-SSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.30/23.99 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 2 cores with 561 seconds (561 total)
% 0.30/23.99 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 51s (1) cores
% 0.30/23.99 % Preprocessing time : 0.407 s
% 0.30/23.99
% 0.30/23.99 % Proof found!
% 0.30/23.99 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.30/23.99 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.30/23.99 % Parsed axioms : 540250
% 0.30/23.99 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 539801
% 0.30/23.99 % Initial clauses : 450
% 0.30/23.99 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.30/23.99 % Initial clauses in saturation : 450
% 0.30/23.99 % Processed clauses : 661
% 0.30/23.99 % ...of these trivial : 43
% 0.30/23.99 % ...subsumed : 27
% 0.30/23.99 % ...remaining for further processing : 591
% 0.30/23.99 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.30/23.99 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.30/23.99 % Backward-subsumed : 7
% 0.30/23.99 % Backward-rewritten : 41
% 0.30/23.99 % Generated clauses : 533
% 0.30/23.99 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 338
% 0.30/23.99 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.30/23.99 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.30/23.99 % Paramodulations : 532
% 0.30/23.99 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.30/23.99 % NegExts : 0
% 0.30/23.99 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.30/23.99 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.30/23.99 % Total rewrite steps : 290
% 0.30/23.99 % ...of those cached : 195
% 0.30/23.99 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.30/23.99 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.30/23.99 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.30/23.99 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.30/23.99 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.30/23.99 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.30/23.99 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.30/23.99 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.30/23.99 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.30/23.99 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.30/23.99 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.30/23.99 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.30/23.99 % Current number of processed clauses : 542
% 0.30/23.99 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 345
% 0.30/23.99 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.30/23.99 % Negative unit clauses : 4
% 0.30/23.99 % Non-unit-clauses : 193
% 0.30/23.99 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 127
% 0.30/23.99 % ...number of literals in the above : 229
% 0.30/23.99 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.30/23.99 % Current number of archived clauses : 49
% 0.30/23.99 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 6436
% 0.30/23.99 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 6099
% 0.30/23.99 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 27
% 0.30/23.99 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1196
% 0.30/23.99 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.30/23.99 % BW rewrite match attempts : 14
% 0.30/23.99 % BW rewrite match successes : 14
% 0.30/23.99 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.30/23.99 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.30/23.99 % Termbank termtop insertions : 3697076
% 0.30/23.99 % Search garbage collected termcells : 2174251
% 0.30/23.99
% 0.30/23.99 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.30/23.99 % User time : 2.967 s
% 0.30/23.99 % System time : 1.248 s
% 0.30/23.99 % Total time : 4.215 s
% 0.30/23.99 % Maximum resident set size: 1242144 pages
% 0.30/23.99
% 0.30/23.99 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.30/23.99 % User time : 20.997 s
% 0.30/23.99 % System time : 2.382 s
% 0.30/23.99 % Total time : 23.379 s
% 0.30/23.99 % Maximum resident set size: 456704 pages
% 0.30/23.99 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------