%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR064+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:16:25 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.14s 5.46s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 14 ( 8 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 20 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 17 ( 11 ~; 4 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 2 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 9 ( 1 sgn 6 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query114,conjecture,
~ genls(f_urlfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwahwatukeecomafnentertainmentarticles030423ahtml)),c_tptpcol_15_74743),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query114) ).
fof(ax1_289,axiom,
! [X1] :
~ ( individual(X1)
& collection(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_289) ).
fof(ax1_229,axiom,
! [X5,X6] :
( genls(X5,X6)
=> collection(X5) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_229) ).
fof(ax1_428,axiom,
individual(f_urlfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwahwatukeecomafnentertainmentarticles030423ahtml))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_428) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ ~ genls(f_urlfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwahwatukeecomafnentertainmentarticles030423ahtml)),c_tptpcol_15_74743),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query114]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X42] :
( ~ individual(X42)
| ~ collection(X42) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_289])])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X53,X54] :
( collection(X53)
| ~ genls(X53,X54) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_229])])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
genls(f_urlfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwahwatukeecomafnentertainmentarticles030423ahtml)),c_tptpcol_15_74743),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( ~ individual(X1)
| ~ collection(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
individual(f_urlfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwahwatukeecomafnentertainmentarticles030423ahtml))),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax1_428]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ genls(X1,X2)
| collection(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
genls(f_urlfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwahwatukeecomafnentertainmentarticles030423ahtml)),c_tptpcol_15_74743),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
~ collection(f_urlfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwahwatukeecomafnentertainmentarticles030423ahtml))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : CSR064+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/5.37 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.09/5.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/5.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/5.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/5.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/5.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/5.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/5.37 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:41:55 UTC 2026
% 0.09/5.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/5.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/5.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/5.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/5.46 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.14/5.46 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/5.46 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/5.46 % Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (3) cores
% 0.14/5.46 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.14/5.46 % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.14/5.46 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/5.46 % new_bool_3 with pid 128065 completed with status 0
% 0.14/5.46 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.14/5.46 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/5.46 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/5.46 % Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (3) cores
% 0.14/5.46 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.14/5.46 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.14/5.46 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.14/5.46 % Search class: FHHNM-FFSF31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.14/5.46 % partial match(1): FHHNF-FFSF31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.14/5.46 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.14/5.46 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 61s (1) cores
% 0.14/5.46 % Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 361s (1) cores
% 0.14/5.46 % SubtermCWHack with pid 128068 completed with status 0
% 0.14/5.46 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.14/5.46 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/5.46 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/5.46 % Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (3) cores
% 0.14/5.46 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.14/5.46 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.14/5.46 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.14/5.46 % Search class: FHHNM-FFSF31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.14/5.46 % partial match(1): FHHNF-FFSF31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.14/5.46 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.14/5.46 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 61s (1) cores
% 0.14/5.46 % Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 0.14/5.46
% 0.14/5.46 % Proof found!
% 0.14/5.46 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.14/5.46 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.14/5.46 % Parsed axioms : 1132
% 0.14/5.46 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 1106
% 0.14/5.46 % Initial clauses : 26
% 0.14/5.46 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.14/5.46 % Initial clauses in saturation : 26
% 0.14/5.46 % Processed clauses : 19
% 0.14/5.46 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.14/5.46 % ...subsumed : 3
% 0.14/5.46 % ...remaining for further processing : 16
% 0.14/5.46 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.14/5.46 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.14/5.46 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.14/5.46 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.14/5.46 % Generated clauses : 9
% 0.14/5.46 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 4
% 0.14/5.46 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.14/5.46 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.14/5.46 % Paramodulations : 9
% 0.14/5.46 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.14/5.46 % NegExts : 0
% 0.14/5.46 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.14/5.46 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.14/5.46 % Total rewrite steps : 2
% 0.14/5.46 % ...of those cached : 1
% 0.14/5.46 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.14/5.46 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.14/5.46 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.14/5.46 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.14/5.46 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.14/5.46 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.14/5.46 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.14/5.46 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.14/5.46 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.14/5.46 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.14/5.46 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.14/5.46 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.14/5.46 % Current number of processed clauses : 16
% 0.14/5.46 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 5
% 0.14/5.46 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.14/5.46 % Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.14/5.46 % Non-unit-clauses : 9
% 0.14/5.46 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 11
% 0.14/5.46 % ...number of literals in the above : 21
% 0.14/5.46 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.14/5.46 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.14/5.46 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 14
% 0.14/5.46 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 14
% 0.14/5.46 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 3
% 0.14/5.46 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.14/5.46 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.14/5.46 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.14/5.46 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.14/5.46 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.14/5.46 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.14/5.46 % Termbank termtop insertions : 8567
% 0.14/5.46 % Search garbage collected termcells : 4912
% 0.14/5.46
% 0.14/5.46 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/5.46 % User time : 0.008 s
% 0.14/5.46 % System time : 0.007 s
% 0.14/5.46 % Total time : 0.015 s
% 0.14/5.46 % Maximum resident set size: 5888 pages
% 0.14/5.46
% 0.14/5.46 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/5.46 % User time : 0.027 s
% 0.14/5.46 % System time : 0.018 s
% 0.14/5.46 % Total time : 0.044 s
% 0.14/5.46 % Maximum resident set size: 5632 pages
% 0.14/5.46 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------