%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR064+4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:16:25 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.25s 1.61s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.25s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 14 ( 8 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 20 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 17 ( 11 ~; 4 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 2 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 9 ( 1 sgn 6 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query214,conjecture,
~ genls(f_urlfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwahwatukeecomafnentertainmentarticles030423ahtml)),c_tptpcol_15_74743),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query214) ).
fof(ax3_4028,axiom,
! [X1] :
~ ( individual(X1)
& collection(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_4028) ).
fof(ax3_19537,axiom,
! [X2,X3] :
( genls(X2,X3)
=> collection(X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_19537) ).
fof(ax3_5658,axiom,
individual(f_urlfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwahwatukeecomafnentertainmentarticles030423ahtml))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_5658) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ ~ genls(f_urlfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwahwatukeecomafnentertainmentarticles030423ahtml)),c_tptpcol_15_74743),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query214]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X61] :
( ~ individual(X61)
| ~ collection(X61) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_4028])])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X63,X64] :
( collection(X63)
| ~ genls(X63,X64) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_19537])])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
genls(f_urlfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwahwatukeecomafnentertainmentarticles030423ahtml)),c_tptpcol_15_74743),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( ~ individual(X1)
| ~ collection(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
individual(f_urlfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwahwatukeecomafnentertainmentarticles030423ahtml))),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax3_5658]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ genls(X1,X2)
| collection(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
genls(f_urlfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwahwatukeecomafnentertainmentarticles030423ahtml)),c_tptpcol_15_74743),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
~ collection(f_urlfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwahwatukeecomafnentertainmentarticles030423ahtml))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05 % Problem : CSR064+4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.00/0.08 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/0.41 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.41 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.41 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.41 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.15/0.41 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.15/0.41 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.41 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.41 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:42:08 UTC 2026
% 0.19/0.42 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.42 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.19/0.50 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.19/0.50 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/1.61 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.25/1.61 % Preprocessing class: FMLLLMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.25/1.61 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.25/1.61 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.25/1.61 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/1.61 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/1.61 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/1.61 % sh5l with pid 2828481 completed with status 0
% 0.25/1.61 % Result found by sh5l
% 0.25/1.61 % Preprocessing class: FMLLLMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.25/1.61 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.25/1.61 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.25/1.61 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/1.61 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/1.61 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/1.61 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.25/1.61 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.25/1.61 % Search class: FHHSM-FFMM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.25/1.61 % partial match(1): FGHSM-FFMM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.25/1.61 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.25/1.61 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.25/1.61 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2828482 completed with status 0
% 0.25/1.61 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.25/1.61 % Preprocessing class: FMLLLMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.25/1.61 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.25/1.61 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.25/1.61 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/1.61 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/1.61 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/1.61 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.25/1.61 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.25/1.61 % Search class: FHHSM-FFMM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.25/1.61 % partial match(1): FGHSM-FFMM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.25/1.61 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.25/1.61 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.25/1.61 % Preprocessing time : 0.016 s
% 0.25/1.61
% 0.25/1.61 % Proof found!
% 0.25/1.61 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.25/1.61 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.25/1.61 % Parsed axioms : 44217
% 0.25/1.61 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 44156
% 0.25/1.61 % Initial clauses : 61
% 0.25/1.61 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 1
% 0.25/1.61 % Initial clauses in saturation : 60
% 0.25/1.61 % Processed clauses : 50
% 0.25/1.61 % ...of these trivial : 10
% 0.25/1.61 % ...subsumed : 6
% 0.25/1.61 % ...remaining for further processing : 34
% 0.25/1.61 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 0.25/1.61 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.25/1.61 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.25/1.61 % Backward-rewritten : 4
% 0.25/1.61 % Generated clauses : 29
% 0.25/1.61 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 17
% 0.25/1.61 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.25/1.61 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.25/1.61 % Paramodulations : 28
% 0.25/1.61 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.25/1.61 % NegExts : 0
% 0.25/1.61 % Equation resolutions : 1
% 0.25/1.61 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.25/1.61 % Total rewrite steps : 24
% 0.25/1.61 % ...of those cached : 15
% 0.25/1.61 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.25/1.61 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.25/1.61 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.25/1.61 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.25/1.61 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.25/1.61 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.25/1.61 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.25/1.61 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.25/1.61 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.25/1.61 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.25/1.61 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.25/1.61 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.25/1.61 % Current number of processed clauses : 29
% 0.25/1.61 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 15
% 0.25/1.61 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.25/1.61 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.25/1.61 % Non-unit-clauses : 13
% 0.25/1.61 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 24
% 0.25/1.61 % ...number of literals in the above : 41
% 0.25/1.61 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.25/1.61 % Current number of archived clauses : 4
% 0.25/1.61 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 29
% 0.25/1.61 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 29
% 0.25/1.61 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 6
% 0.25/1.61 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.25/1.61 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.25/1.61 % BW rewrite match attempts : 3
% 0.25/1.61 % BW rewrite match successes : 3
% 0.25/1.61 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.25/1.61 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.25/1.61 % Termbank termtop insertions : 294464
% 0.25/1.61 % Search garbage collected termcells : 157821
% 0.25/1.61
% 0.25/1.61 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.25/1.61 % User time : 0.181 s
% 0.25/1.61 % System time : 0.085 s
% 0.25/1.61 % Total time : 0.266 s
% 0.25/1.61 % Maximum resident set size: 84532 pages
% 0.25/1.61
% 0.25/1.61 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.25/1.61 % User time : 0.893 s
% 0.25/1.61 % System time : 0.160 s
% 0.25/1.61 % Total time : 1.053 s
% 0.25/1.61 % Maximum resident set size: 38144 pages
% 0.25/1.61 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------