%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR064+5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v3.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:18:27 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 23.88s 17.28s
% Output : CNFRefutation 23.88s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 14 ( 8 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 20 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 17 ( 11 ~; 4 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 2 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 9 ( 1 sgn 6 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query264,conjecture,
~ genls(f_urlfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwahwatukeecomafnentertainmentarticles030423ahtml)),c_tptpcol_15_74743),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query264) ).
fof(ax4_117519,axiom,
! [X1] :
~ ( individual(X1)
& collection(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+4.ax',ax4_117519) ).
fof(ax4_2648,axiom,
! [X2,X3] :
( genls(X2,X3)
=> collection(X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+4.ax',ax4_2648) ).
fof(ax4_180543,axiom,
individual(f_urlfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwahwatukeecomafnentertainmentarticles030423ahtml))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+4.ax',ax4_180543) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ ~ genls(f_urlfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwahwatukeecomafnentertainmentarticles030423ahtml)),c_tptpcol_15_74743),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query264]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X82] :
( ~ individual(X82)
| ~ collection(X82) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax4_117519])])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X75,X76] :
( collection(X75)
| ~ genls(X75,X76) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax4_2648])])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
genls(f_urlfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwahwatukeecomafnentertainmentarticles030423ahtml)),c_tptpcol_15_74743),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( ~ individual(X1)
| ~ collection(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
individual(f_urlfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwahwatukeecomafnentertainmentarticles030423ahtml))),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax4_180543]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ genls(X1,X2)
| collection(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
genls(f_urlfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwahwatukeecomafnentertainmentarticles030423ahtml)),c_tptpcol_15_74743),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
~ collection(f_urlfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwahwatukeecomafnentertainmentarticles030423ahtml))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : CSR064+5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v3.5.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.37 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:42:19 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.38 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 23.88/17.28 % Version: 3.5.1
% 23.88/17.28 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 23.88/17.28 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 288 seconds (2304 total)
% 23.88/17.28 % Starting new_ho_10 with 576s (2) cores
% 23.88/17.28 % Starting sh3 with 576s (2) cores
% 23.88/17.28 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 576s (2) cores
% 23.88/17.28 % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 576s (2) cores
% 23.88/17.28 % new_ho_10 with pid 2829274 completed with status 0
% 23.88/17.28 % Result found by new_ho_10
% 23.88/17.28 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 23.88/17.28 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 288 seconds (2304 total)
% 23.88/17.28 % Starting new_ho_10 with 576s (2) cores
% 23.88/17.28 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 23.88/17.28 % SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 23.88/17.28 % Search class: FHHSM-FFMM31-SFFFFFNN
% 23.88/17.28 % partial match(1): FGHSM-FFMM31-SFFFFFNN
% 23.88/17.28 % Scheduled 11 strats onto 2 cores with 574 seconds (574 total)
% 23.88/17.28 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 52s (1) cores
% 23.88/17.28 % Starting new_ho_10 with 58s (1) cores
% 23.88/17.28 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2829282 completed with status 0
% 23.88/17.28 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 23.88/17.28 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 23.88/17.28 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 288 seconds (2304 total)
% 23.88/17.28 % Starting new_ho_10 with 576s (2) cores
% 23.88/17.28 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 23.88/17.28 % SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 23.88/17.28 % Search class: FHHSM-FFMM31-SFFFFFNN
% 23.88/17.28 % partial match(1): FGHSM-FFMM31-SFFFFFNN
% 23.88/17.28 % Scheduled 11 strats onto 2 cores with 574 seconds (574 total)
% 23.88/17.28 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 52s (1) cores
% 23.88/17.28 % Preprocessing time : 0.190 s
% 23.88/17.28
% 23.88/17.28 % Proof found!
% 23.88/17.28 % SZS status Theorem
% 23.88/17.28 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 23.88/17.28 % Parsed axioms : 540250
% 23.88/17.28 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 540078
% 23.88/17.28 % Initial clauses : 172
% 23.88/17.28 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 2
% 23.88/17.28 % Initial clauses in saturation : 170
% 23.88/17.28 % Processed clauses : 81
% 23.88/17.28 % ...of these trivial : 16
% 23.88/17.28 % ...subsumed : 8
% 23.88/17.28 % ...remaining for further processing : 57
% 23.88/17.28 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 23.88/17.28 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 23.88/17.28 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 23.88/17.28 % Backward-rewritten : 4
% 23.88/17.28 % Generated clauses : 37
% 23.88/17.28 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 27
% 23.88/17.28 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 23.88/17.28 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 23.88/17.28 % Paramodulations : 36
% 23.88/17.28 % Factorizations : 0
% 23.88/17.28 % NegExts : 0
% 23.88/17.28 % Equation resolutions : 1
% 23.88/17.28 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 23.88/17.28 % Total rewrite steps : 25
% 23.88/17.28 % ...of those cached : 11
% 23.88/17.28 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 23.88/17.28 % Propositional check models : 0
% 23.88/17.28 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 23.88/17.28 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 23.88/17.28 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 23.88/17.28 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 23.88/17.28 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 23.88/17.28 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 23.88/17.28 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 23.88/17.28 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 23.88/17.28 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 23.88/17.28 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 23.88/17.28 % Current number of processed clauses : 52
% 23.88/17.28 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 26
% 23.88/17.28 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 23.88/17.28 % Negative unit clauses : 7
% 23.88/17.28 % Non-unit-clauses : 19
% 23.88/17.28 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 110
% 23.88/17.28 % ...number of literals in the above : 161
% 23.88/17.28 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 23.88/17.28 % Current number of archived clauses : 4
% 23.88/17.28 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 107
% 23.88/17.28 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 102
% 23.88/17.28 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 8
% 23.88/17.28 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 37
% 23.88/17.28 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 23.88/17.28 % BW rewrite match attempts : 4
% 23.88/17.28 % BW rewrite match successes : 4
% 23.88/17.28 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 23.88/17.28 % Condensation successes : 0
% 23.88/17.28 % Termbank termtop insertions : 3683632
% 23.88/17.28 % Search garbage collected termcells : 2173990
% 23.88/17.28
% 23.88/17.28 % -------------------------------------------------
% 23.88/17.28 % User time : 2.180 s
% 23.88/17.28 % System time : 0.940 s
% 23.88/17.28 % Total time : 3.120 s
% 23.88/17.28 % Maximum resident set size: 1241888 pages
% 23.88/17.28
% 23.88/17.28 % -------------------------------------------------
% 23.88/17.28 % User time : 14.756 s
% 23.88/17.28 % System time : 1.834 s
% 23.88/17.28 % Total time : 16.590 s
% 23.88/17.28 % Maximum resident set size: 456960 pages
% 23.88/17.28 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------