%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR064+6 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:16:26 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.17s 102.05s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.17s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 14 ( 8 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 20 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 16 ( 10 ~; 4 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 2 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 9 ( 1 sgn 6 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query314,conjecture,
~ genls(f_urlfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwahwatukeecomafnentertainmentarticles030423ahtml)),c_tptpcol_15_74743),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query314) ).
fof(ax5_1645759,axiom,
! [X2,X3] :
( genls(X2,X3)
=> collection(X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+5.ax',ax5_1645759) ).
fof(ax5_1365323,axiom,
! [X1] :
~ ( individual(X1)
& collection(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+5.ax',ax5_1365323) ).
fof(ax5_1236646,axiom,
individual(f_urlfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwahwatukeecomafnentertainmentarticles030423ahtml))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+5.ax',ax5_1236646) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ ~ genls(f_urlfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwahwatukeecomafnentertainmentarticles030423ahtml)),c_tptpcol_15_74743),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query314]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X130,X131] :
( collection(X130)
| ~ genls(X130,X131) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax5_1645759])])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
genls(f_urlfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwahwatukeecomafnentertainmentarticles030423ahtml)),c_tptpcol_15_74743),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X127] :
( ~ individual(X127)
| ~ collection(X127) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax5_1365323])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( ~ genls(X1,X2)
| collection(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
genls(f_urlfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwahwatukeecomafnentertainmentarticles030423ahtml)),c_tptpcol_15_74743),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ individual(X1)
| ~ collection(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
collection(f_urlfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwahwatukeecomafnentertainmentarticles030423ahtml))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
individual(f_urlfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwahwatukeecomafnentertainmentarticles030423ahtml))),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax5_1236646]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : CSR064+6 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.3.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.36 % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:44:47 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.40 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.12/0.40 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.17/102.05 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.17/102.05 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/102.05 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 236 seconds (1888 total)
% 0.17/102.05 % Starting new_ho_10 with 472s (2) cores
% 0.17/102.05 % Starting sh3 with 472s (2) cores
% 0.17/102.05 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 472s (2) cores
% 0.17/102.05 % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 472s (2) cores
% 0.17/102.05 % new_ho_10 with pid 3536168 completed with status 0
% 0.17/102.05 % Result found by new_ho_10
% 0.17/102.05 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/102.05 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 236 seconds (1888 total)
% 0.17/102.05 % Starting new_ho_10 with 472s (2) cores
% 0.17/102.05 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.17/102.05 % SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.17/102.05 % Search class: FHHSM-SMLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.17/102.05 % partial match(1): FGHSM-SMLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.17/102.05 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 2 cores with 451 seconds (451 total)
% 0.17/102.05 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 41s (1) cores
% 0.17/102.05 % Starting new_ho_10 with 46s (1) cores
% 0.17/102.05 % new_ho_10 with pid 3536327 completed with status 0
% 0.17/102.05 % Result found by new_ho_10
% 0.17/102.05 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/102.05 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 236 seconds (1888 total)
% 0.17/102.05 % Starting new_ho_10 with 472s (2) cores
% 0.17/102.05 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.17/102.05 % SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.17/102.05 % Search class: FHHSM-SMLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.17/102.05 % partial match(1): FGHSM-SMLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.17/102.05 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 2 cores with 451 seconds (451 total)
% 0.17/102.05 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 41s (1) cores
% 0.17/102.05 % Starting new_ho_10 with 46s (1) cores
% 0.17/102.05 % Preprocessing time : 2.320 s
% 0.17/102.05 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.17/102.05
% 0.17/102.05 % Proof found!
% 0.17/102.05 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.17/102.05 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.17/102.05 % Parsed axioms : 3341978
% 0.17/102.05 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 3321977
% 0.17/102.05 % Initial clauses : 20001
% 0.17/102.05 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 2
% 0.17/102.05 % Initial clauses in saturation : 19999
% 0.17/102.05 % Processed clauses : 29134
% 0.17/102.05 % ...of these trivial : 2598
% 0.17/102.05 % ...subsumed : 280
% 0.17/102.05 % ...remaining for further processing : 26256
% 0.17/102.05 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 0.17/102.05 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.17/102.05 % Backward-subsumed : 7
% 0.17/102.05 % Backward-rewritten : 834
% 0.17/102.05 % Generated clauses : 8793
% 0.17/102.05 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 7308
% 0.17/102.05 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.17/102.05 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.17/102.05 % Paramodulations : 8792
% 0.17/102.05 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.17/102.05 % NegExts : 0
% 0.17/102.05 % Equation resolutions : 1
% 0.17/102.05 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.17/102.05 % Total rewrite steps : 4829
% 0.17/102.05 % ...of those cached : 1871
% 0.17/102.05 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.17/102.05 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.17/102.05 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.17/102.05 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.17/102.05 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.17/102.05 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.17/102.05 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.17/102.05 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.17/102.05 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.17/102.05 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.17/102.05 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.17/102.05 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.17/102.05 % Current number of processed clauses : 8253
% 0.17/102.05 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 5621
% 0.17/102.05 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.17/102.05 % Negative unit clauses : 1353
% 0.17/102.05 % Non-unit-clauses : 1279
% 0.17/102.05 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 15334
% 0.17/102.05 % ...number of literals in the above : 24094
% 0.17/102.05 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.17/102.05 % Current number of archived clauses : 18002
% 0.17/102.05 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 3025275
% 0.17/102.05 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2772152
% 0.17/102.05 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 246
% 0.17/102.05 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1528083
% 0.17/102.05 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.17/102.05 % BW rewrite match attempts : 40771
% 0.17/102.05 % BW rewrite match successes : 820
% 0.17/102.05 % Condensation attempts : 29134
% 0.17/102.05 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.17/102.05 % Termbank termtop insertions : 22791495
% 0.17/102.05 % Search garbage collected termcells : 10457783
% 0.17/102.05
% 0.17/102.05 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/102.05 % User time : 25.264 s
% 0.17/102.05 % System time : 6.988 s
% 0.17/102.05 % Total time : 32.252 s
% 0.17/102.05 % Maximum resident set size: 5024744 pages
% 0.17/102.05
% 0.17/102.05 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/102.05 % User time : 95.547 s
% 0.17/102.05 % System time : 13.326 s
% 0.17/102.05 % Total time : 108.873 s
% 0.17/102.05 % Maximum resident set size: 2273024 pages
% 0.17/102.05 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------