↑ Up

E-SAT---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem  : CSR064+6 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:18:28 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.32s 144.02s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.32s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   14 (   8 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   20 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   16 (  10   ~;   4   |;   1   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   2 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    9 (   1 sgn   6   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query314,conjecture,
    ~ genls(f_urlfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwahwatukeecomafnentertainmentarticles030423ahtml)),c_tptpcol_15_74743),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query314) ).

fof(ax5_1645759,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3] :
      ( genls(X2,X3)
     => collection(X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+5.ax',ax5_1645759) ).

fof(ax5_1365323,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ~ ( individual(X1)
        & collection(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+5.ax',ax5_1365323) ).

fof(ax5_1236646,axiom,
    individual(f_urlfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwahwatukeecomafnentertainmentarticles030423ahtml))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+5.ax',ax5_1236646) ).

fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ~ genls(f_urlfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwahwatukeecomafnentertainmentarticles030423ahtml)),c_tptpcol_15_74743),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query314]) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X130,X131] :
      ( collection(X130)
      | ~ genls(X130,X131) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax5_1645759])])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    genls(f_urlfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwahwatukeecomafnentertainmentarticles030423ahtml)),c_tptpcol_15_74743),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X127] :
      ( ~ individual(X127)
      | ~ collection(X127) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax5_1365323])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( ~ genls(X1,X2)
    | collection(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    genls(f_urlfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwahwatukeecomafnentertainmentarticles030423ahtml)),c_tptpcol_15_74743),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( ~ individual(X1)
    | ~ collection(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    collection(f_urlfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwahwatukeecomafnentertainmentarticles030423ahtml))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    individual(f_urlfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwahwatukeecomafnentertainmentarticles030423ahtml))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax5_1236646]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : CSR064+6 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.3.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.22/0.48  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.22/0.48  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.22/0.48  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.22/0.48  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.22/0.48  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.22/0.48  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.22/0.48  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.22/0.48  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:44:52 UTC 2026
% 0.22/0.48  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.22/0.48  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.27/0.55  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.27/0.55  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.32/144.02  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.32/144.02  % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.32/144.02  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 197 seconds (1576 total)
% 0.32/144.02  % Starting new_ho_10 with 394s (2) cores
% 0.32/144.02  % Starting sh3 with 394s (2) cores
% 0.32/144.02  % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 394s (2) cores
% 0.32/144.02  % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 394s (2) cores
% 0.32/144.02  % ho_unfolding_3 with pid 2534187 completed with status 0
% 0.32/144.02  % Result found by ho_unfolding_3
% 0.32/144.02  % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.32/144.02  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 197 seconds (1576 total)
% 0.32/144.02  % Starting new_ho_10 with 394s (2) cores
% 0.32/144.02  % Starting sh3 with 394s (2) cores
% 0.32/144.02  % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 394s (2) cores
% 0.32/144.02  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.32/144.02  % SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.32/144.02  % Search class: FHHSM-SMLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.32/144.02  % partial match(1): FGHSM-SMLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.32/144.02  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 2 cores with 368 seconds (368 total)
% 0.32/144.02  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 34s (1) cores
% 0.32/144.02  % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 37s (1) cores
% 0.32/144.02  % ho_unfolding_3 with pid 2534822 completed with status 0
% 0.32/144.02  % Result found by ho_unfolding_3
% 0.32/144.02  % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.32/144.02  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 197 seconds (1576 total)
% 0.32/144.02  % Starting new_ho_10 with 394s (2) cores
% 0.32/144.02  % Starting sh3 with 394s (2) cores
% 0.32/144.02  % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 394s (2) cores
% 0.32/144.02  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.32/144.02  % SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.32/144.02  % Search class: FHHSM-SMLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.32/144.02  % partial match(1): FGHSM-SMLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.32/144.02  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 2 cores with 368 seconds (368 total)
% 0.32/144.02  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 34s (1) cores
% 0.32/144.02  % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 37s (1) cores
% 0.32/144.02  % Preprocessing time       : 1.585 s
% 0.32/144.02  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.32/144.02  
% 0.32/144.02  % Proof found!
% 0.32/144.02  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.32/144.02  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.32/144.02  % Parsed axioms                        : 3341978
% 0.32/144.02  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 3321977
% 0.32/144.02  % Initial clauses                      : 20001
% 0.32/144.02  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 2
% 0.32/144.02  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 19999
% 0.32/144.02  % Processed clauses                    : 23696
% 0.32/144.02  % ...of these trivial                  : 2474
% 0.32/144.02  % ...subsumed                          : 246
% 0.32/144.02  % ...remaining for further processing  : 20976
% 0.32/144.02  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 1
% 0.32/144.02  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.32/144.02  % Backward-subsumed                    : 3
% 0.32/144.02  % Backward-rewritten                   : 157
% 0.32/144.02  % Generated clauses                    : 2604
% 0.32/144.02  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2278
% 0.32/144.02  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.32/144.02  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.32/144.02  % Paramodulations                      : 2603
% 0.32/144.02  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.32/144.02  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.32/144.02  % Equation resolutions                 : 1
% 0.32/144.02  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.32/144.02  % Total rewrite steps                  : 2856
% 0.32/144.02  % ...of those cached                   : 291
% 0.32/144.02  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.32/144.02  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.32/144.02  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.32/144.02  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.32/144.02  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.32/144.02  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.32/144.02  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.32/144.02  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.32/144.02  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.32/144.02  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.32/144.02  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.32/144.02  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.32/144.02  % Current number of processed clauses  : 3654
% 0.32/144.02  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 2236
% 0.32/144.02  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.32/144.02  %    Negative unit clauses             : 616
% 0.32/144.02  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 802
% 0.32/144.02  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 15742
% 0.32/144.02  % ...number of literals in the above   : 24409
% 0.32/144.02  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.32/144.02  % Current number of archived clauses   : 17321
% 0.32/144.02  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2966604
% 0.32/144.02  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2717089
% 0.32/144.02  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 245
% 0.32/144.02  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 324197
% 0.32/144.02  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.32/144.02  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 28567
% 0.32/144.02  % BW rewrite match successes           : 152
% 0.32/144.02  % Condensation attempts                : 23696
% 0.32/144.02  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.32/144.02  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 22754689
% 0.32/144.02  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 10457783
% 0.32/144.02  
% 0.32/144.02  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.32/144.02  % User time                : 26.619 s
% 0.32/144.02  % System time              : 8.644 s
% 0.32/144.02  % Total time               : 35.263 s
% 0.32/144.02  % Maximum resident set size: 5024964 pages
% 0.32/144.02  
% 0.32/144.02  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.32/144.02  % User time                : 133.722 s
% 0.32/144.02  % System time              : 15.340 s
% 0.32/144.02  % Total time               : 149.062 s
% 0.32/144.02  % Maximum resident set size: 2273536 pages
% 0.32/144.02  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------