%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : SPASS---3.9 % Problem : CSR065+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp % Command : run_spass %d %s % Computer : n019.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Fri Jul 15 23:24:55 EDT 2022 % Result : Theorem 2.40s 2.63s % Output : Refutation 2.40s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.06/0.12 % Problem : CSR065+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0. % 0.06/0.12 % Command : run_spass %d %s % 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu % 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Fri Jun 10 15:10:55 EDT 2022 % 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime : % 2.40/2.63 % 2.40/2.63 SPASS V 3.9 % 2.40/2.63 SPASS beiseite: Proof found. % 2.40/2.63 % SZS status Theorem % 2.40/2.63 Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 2.40/2.63 SPASS derived 3727 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 3764 clauses. % 2.40/2.63 SPASS allocated 101160 KBytes. % 2.40/2.63 SPASS spent 0:00:02.22 on the problem. % 2.40/2.63 0:00:00.05 for the input. % 2.40/2.63 0:00:00.21 for the FLOTTER CNF translation. % 2.40/2.63 0:00:00.12 for inferences. % 2.40/2.63 0:00:00.00 for the backtracking. % 2.40/2.63 0:00:01.47 for the reduction. % 2.40/2.63 % 2.40/2.63 % 2.40/2.63 Here is a proof with depth 2, length 23 : % 2.40/2.63 % SZS output start Refutation % 2.40/2.63 1[0:Inp] || -> mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt)*. % 2.40/2.63 140[0:Inp] || -> genlmt(c_tptp_spindleheadmt,c_cyclistsmt)*r. % 2.40/2.63 169[0:Inp] || -> genlmt(c_tptp_member3993_mt,c_tptp_spindleheadmt)*r. % 2.40/2.63 194[0:Inp] || -> genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member3993_mt)*l. % 2.40/2.63 223[0:Inp] || -> genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member235_mt)*l. % 2.40/2.63 238[0:Inp] || -> genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member1672_mt)*l. % 2.40/2.63 288[0:Inp] || tptpofobject(c_tptpridgeline_topographical,f_tptpquantityfn_13(n_468))* -> . % 2.40/2.63 296[0:Inp] || mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt) -> ridgeline_topographical(c_tptpridgeline_topographical)*. % 2.40/2.63 997[0:Inp] || genlmt(u,v)*+ -> microtheory(u)*. % 2.40/2.63 1082[0:Inp] mtvisible(u) || genlmt(u,v)*+ -> mtvisible(v)*. % 2.40/2.63 1084[0:Inp] ridgeline_topographical(u) || mtvisible(c_tptp_member235_mt) -> tptpofobject(u,f_tptpquantityfn_13(n_468))*. % 2.40/2.63 1135[0:Res:1084.2,288.0] ridgeline_topographical(c_tptpridgeline_topographical) || mtvisible(c_tptp_member235_mt)* -> . % 2.40/2.63 1630[0:SoR:1135.0,296.1] || mtvisible(c_tptp_member235_mt) mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt)* -> . % 2.40/2.63 4199[0:Res:238.0,997.0] || -> microtheory(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt)*. % 2.40/2.63 5138[0:Res:169.0,1082.1] mtvisible(c_tptp_member3993_mt) || -> mtvisible(c_tptp_spindleheadmt)*. % 2.40/2.63 5160[0:Res:223.0,1082.1] mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt) || -> mtvisible(c_tptp_member235_mt)*. % 2.40/2.63 5161[0:Res:194.0,1082.1] mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt) || -> mtvisible(c_tptp_member3993_mt)*. % 2.40/2.63 5187[0:Res:140.0,1082.1] mtvisible(c_tptp_spindleheadmt) || -> mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt)*. % 2.40/2.63 5299[0:SSi:5160.0,1.0,4199.0] || -> mtvisible(c_tptp_member235_mt)*. % 2.40/2.63 5301[0:MRR:1630.0,5299.0] || mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt)* -> . % 2.40/2.63 5310[0:SSi:5161.0,1.0,4199.0] || -> mtvisible(c_tptp_member3993_mt)*. % 2.40/2.63 5311[0:MRR:5138.0,5310.0] || -> mtvisible(c_tptp_spindleheadmt)*. % 2.40/2.63 5363[0:MRR:5187.0,5187.1,5311.0,5301.0] || -> . % 2.40/2.63 % SZS output end Refutation % 2.40/2.63 Formulae used in the proof : query115 ax1_254 ax1_315 ax1_364 ax1_419 ax1_453 ax1_25 ax1_1127 ax1_1123 ax1_105 % 2.40/2.63 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------