%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem : CSR066+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 5 04:14:41 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 1.25s 1.72s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.25s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 25 ( 7 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 49 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 43 ( 19 ~; 14 |; 4 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 6 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 6 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 10 ( 10 usr; 6 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 27 ( 0 sgn 15 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query66,conjecture,
? [X13] :
( mtvisible(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_webnjiteducjohnsontreebiochhtm)),c_translation_21))
=> ( tptp_8_271(X13,c_theprototypicalshavingrazor_manual)
& tptpcol_16_25972(X13) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query66) ).
fof(just32,axiom,
! [X13] :
( isa(X13,c_tptpcol_16_25972)
=> tptpcol_16_25972(X13) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',just32) ).
fof(just9,axiom,
! [X1] :
( shavingrazor_manual(X1)
=> tptp_8_271(f_relationexistsallfn(X1,c_tptp_8_271,c_tptpcol_16_25972,c_shavingrazor_manual),X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',just9) ).
fof(just4,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3,X4] :
( ( isa(X1,X2)
& relationexistsall(X3,X4,X2) )
=> isa(f_relationexistsallfn(X1,X3,X4,X2),X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',just4) ).
fof(just31,axiom,
! [X13] :
( shavingrazor_manual(X13)
=> isa(X13,c_shavingrazor_manual) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',just31) ).
fof(just11,axiom,
shavingrazor_manual(c_theprototypicalshavingrazor_manual),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',just11) ).
fof(just10,axiom,
relationexistsall(c_tptp_8_271,c_tptpcol_16_25972,c_shavingrazor_manual),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',just10) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X13] :
( mtvisible(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_webnjiteducjohnsontreebiochhtm)),c_translation_21))
=> ( tptp_8_271(X13,c_theprototypicalshavingrazor_manual)
& tptpcol_16_25972(X13) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query66]) ).
fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
! [X289] :
( mtvisible(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_webnjiteducjohnsontreebiochhtm)),c_translation_21))
& ( ~ tptp_8_271(X289,c_theprototypicalshavingrazor_manual)
| ~ tptpcol_16_25972(X289) ) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X204] :
( ~ isa(X204,c_tptpcol_16_25972)
| tptpcol_16_25972(X204) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[just32])]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
( ~ tptp_8_271(X1,c_theprototypicalshavingrazor_manual)
| ~ tptpcol_16_25972(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( tptpcol_16_25972(X1)
| ~ isa(X1,c_tptpcol_16_25972) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
fof(c_0_12,plain,
! [X160] :
( ~ shavingrazor_manual(X160)
| tptp_8_271(f_relationexistsallfn(X160,c_tptp_8_271,c_tptpcol_16_25972,c_shavingrazor_manual),X160) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[just9])]) ).
fof(c_0_13,plain,
! [X156,X157,X158,X159] :
( ~ isa(X156,X157)
| ~ relationexistsall(X158,X159,X157)
| isa(f_relationexistsallfn(X156,X158,X159,X157),X159) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[just4])]) ).
fof(c_0_14,plain,
! [X203] :
( ~ shavingrazor_manual(X203)
| isa(X203,c_shavingrazor_manual) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[just31])]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
( ~ tptp_8_271(X1,c_theprototypicalshavingrazor_manual)
| ~ isa(X1,c_tptpcol_16_25972) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( tptp_8_271(f_relationexistsallfn(X1,c_tptp_8_271,c_tptpcol_16_25972,c_shavingrazor_manual),X1)
| ~ shavingrazor_manual(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
shavingrazor_manual(c_theprototypicalshavingrazor_manual),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[just11]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( isa(f_relationexistsallfn(X1,X3,X4,X2),X4)
| ~ isa(X1,X2)
| ~ relationexistsall(X3,X4,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
relationexistsall(c_tptp_8_271,c_tptpcol_16_25972,c_shavingrazor_manual),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[just10]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( isa(X1,c_shavingrazor_manual)
| ~ shavingrazor_manual(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
~ isa(f_relationexistsallfn(c_theprototypicalshavingrazor_manual,c_tptp_8_271,c_tptpcol_16_25972,c_shavingrazor_manual),c_tptpcol_16_25972),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_17])]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( isa(f_relationexistsallfn(X1,c_tptp_8_271,c_tptpcol_16_25972,c_shavingrazor_manual),c_tptpcol_16_25972)
| ~ isa(X1,c_shavingrazor_manual) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
isa(c_theprototypicalshavingrazor_manual,c_shavingrazor_manual),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),c_0_23])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : CSR066+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.00/0.12 % Command : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.16/0.33 % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.16/0.33 % DateTime : Mon May 4 16:41:31 EDT 2026
% 0.16/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/0.34 % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.25/1.72 % Version : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.25/1.72 % Problem : theBenchmark.p
% 1.25/1.72 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.25/1.72 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.25/1.72 % Total time : 1.370s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------