↑ Up

SOS---2.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : CSR066+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 23:21:48 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 3.95s 4.18s
% Output   : Refutation 3.95s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.11  % Problem  : CSR066+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Fri Jun 10 01:41:18 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.35  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.35  The process was started by sandbox on n028.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.35  Fri Jun 10 01:41:18 2022
% 0.12/0.35  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 19360.
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.35  set(auto).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.35  clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  formula_list(usable).
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  This is a Horn set without equality.  The strategy will
% 0.12/0.35  be hyperresolution, with satellites in sos and nuclei
% 0.12/0.35  in usable.
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.35    Following clause subsumed by 5 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -genlpreds(A,B)|predicate(B).
% 0.12/0.35    Following clause subsumed by 6 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -genlpreds(A,B)|predicate(A).
% 0.12/0.35    Following clause subsumed by 8 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -predicate(A)|genlpreds(A,A).
% 0.12/0.35    Following clause subsumed by 29 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -isa(A,B)|collection(B).
% 0.12/0.35    Following clause subsumed by 30 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -isa(A,B)|thing(A).
% 0.12/0.35    Following clause subsumed by 35 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -genlmt(A,B)|microtheory(B).
% 0.12/0.35    Following clause subsumed by 36 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -genlmt(A,B)|microtheory(A).
% 0.12/0.35    Following clause subsumed by 38 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -microtheory(A)|genlmt(A,A).
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.12/0.39  
% 0.12/0.39  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.12/0.39  
% 0.12/0.39  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.12/0.39  
% 0.12/0.39  
% 0.12/0.39  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.12/0.39  
% 0.12/0.39  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.12/0.39  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.12/0.39  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.12/0.39  number of clauses in intial UL: 39
% 0.12/0.39  number of clauses initially in problem: 67
% 0.12/0.39  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 58
% 0.12/0.39  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 54
% 0.12/0.39  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.12/0.39  absolute distinct symbol count: 51
% 0.12/0.39     distinct predicate count: 26
% 0.12/0.39     distinct function count: 4
% 0.12/0.39     distinct constant count: 21
% 0.12/0.39  
% 0.12/0.39  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.12/0.39  
% 0.12/0.39  
% 0.12/0.39  
% 0.12/0.39  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.12/0.39  
% 0.12/0.39  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.12/0.39  
% 0.12/0.39  =========== start of search ===========
% 3.95/4.18  
% 3.95/4.18  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 3.95/4.18  % SZS status Theorem
% 3.95/4.18  % SZS output start Refutation
% 3.95/4.18  
% 3.95/4.18  Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 3.95/4.18  
% 3.95/4.18  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 3.95/4.18  
% 3.95/4.18  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.95/4.18  
% 3.95/4.18  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.95/4.18  
% 3.95/4.18  Model 4 [ 1 0 385 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 3.95/4.18  
% 3.95/4.18  Model 5 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 3.95/4.18  
% 3.95/4.18  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 3.95/4.18  
% 3.95/4.18  Model 6 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 3.95/4.18  
% 3.95/4.18  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 3.95/4.18  
% 3.95/4.18  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.95/4.18  
% 3.95/4.18  Model 7 [ 1 0 566 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 3.95/4.18  
% 3.95/4.18  Model 8 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 3.95/4.18  
% 3.95/4.18  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 3.95/4.18  
% 3.95/4.18  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.95/4.18  
% 3.95/4.18  Model 9 [ 3 0 388 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 3.95/4.18  
% 3.95/4.18  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.95/4.18  
% 3.95/4.18  Model 10 [ 1 1 810 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 3.95/4.18  
% 3.95/4.18  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.95/4.18  
% 3.95/4.18  Model 11 [ 1 0 508 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 3.95/4.18  
% 3.95/4.18  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.95/4.18  
% 3.95/4.18  Model 12 [ 3 0 1340 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 3.95/4.18  
% 3.95/4.18  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.95/4.18  
% 3.95/4.18  Model 13 [ 2 0 363 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 3.95/4.18  
% 3.95/4.18  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.95/4.18  
% 3.95/4.18  Model 14 [ 5 0 3617 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 3.95/4.18  
% 3.95/4.18  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.95/4.18  
% 3.95/4.18  Model 15 [ 2 1 415 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 3.95/4.18  
% 3.95/4.18  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.95/4.18  
% 3.95/4.18  Model 16 [ 5 0 485 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 3.95/4.18  
% 3.95/4.18  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.95/4.18  
% 3.95/4.18  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.95/4.18  
% 3.95/4.18  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.95/4.18  
% 3.95/4.18  Model 17 [ 39 3 179070 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 3.95/4.18  
% 3.95/4.18  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.95/4.18  
% 3.95/4.18  Model 18 [ 25 1 33354 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 3.95/4.18  
% 3.95/4.18  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.95/4.18  
% 3.95/4.18  Model 19 [ 2 1 2560 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 3.95/4.18  
% 3.95/4.18  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.95/4.18  
% 3.95/4.18  Model 20 [ 1 1 4988 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 3.95/4.18  
% 3.95/4.18  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.95/4.18  
% 3.95/4.18  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.95/4.18  
% 3.95/4.18  Model 21 [ 6 3 82578 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 3.95/4.18  
% 3.95/4.18  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.95/4.18  
% 3.95/4.18  Model 22 [ 78 6 165155 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 3.95/4.18  
% 3.95/4.18  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.95/4.18  
% 3.95/4.18  Model 23 [ 88 5 171810 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 3.95/4.18  
% 3.95/4.18  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.95/4.18  
% 3.95/4.18  Model 24 [ 50 22 215049 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 3.95/4.18  
% 3.95/4.18  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.95/4.18  
% 3.95/4.18  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.95/4.18  
% 3.95/4.18  Model 25 [ 86 2 7319 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 3.95/4.18  
% 3.95/4.19  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.95/4.19  
% 3.95/4.19  Model 26 [ 17 2 5483 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 3.95/4.19  
% 3.95/4.19  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.95/4.19  
% 3.95/4.19  Model 27 [ 140 7 247350 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 3.95/4.19  
% 3.95/4.19  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.95/4.19  
% 3.95/4.19  Model 28 [ 81 7 215404 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 3.95/4.19  
% 3.95/4.19  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.95/4.19  
% 3.95/4.19  Model 29 [ 187 21 237789 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 3.95/4.19  
% 3.95/4.19  -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at   3.81 sec ----> 101 [hyper,71,39,97] {-} $F.
% 3.95/4.19  
% 3.95/4.19  Length of proof is 4.  Level of proof is 3.
% 3.95/4.19  
% 3.95/4.19  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 3.95/4.19  % SZS status Theorem
% 3.95/4.19  % SZS output start Refutation
% 3.95/4.19  
% 3.95/4.19  1 [] {+} -isa(A,B)| -relationexistsall(C,D,B)|isa(f_relationexistsallfn(A,C,D,B),D).
% 3.95/4.19  2 [] {+} -shavingrazor_manual(A)|tptp_8_271(f_relationexistsallfn(A,c_tptp_8_271,c_tptpcol_16_25972,c_shavingrazor_manual),A).
% 3.95/4.19  19 [] {+} -shavingrazor_manual(A)|isa(A,c_shavingrazor_manual).
% 3.95/4.19  20 [] {+} -isa(A,c_tptpcol_16_25972)|tptpcol_16_25972(A).
% 3.95/4.19  39 [] {+} -tptp_8_271(A,c_theprototypicalshavingrazor_manual)| -tptpcol_16_25972(A).
% 3.95/4.19  47 [] {+} relationexistsall(c_tptp_8_271,c_tptpcol_16_25972,c_shavingrazor_manual).
% 3.95/4.19  48 [] {+} shavingrazor_manual(c_theprototypicalshavingrazor_manual).
% 3.95/4.19  70 [hyper,48,19] {+} isa(c_theprototypicalshavingrazor_manual,c_shavingrazor_manual).
% 3.95/4.19  71 [hyper,48,2] {+} tptp_8_271(f_relationexistsallfn(c_theprototypicalshavingrazor_manual,c_tptp_8_271,c_tptpcol_16_25972,c_shavingrazor_manual),c_theprototypicalshavingrazor_manual).
% 3.95/4.19  88 [hyper,47,1,70] {-} isa(f_relationexistsallfn(c_theprototypicalshavingrazor_manual,c_tptp_8_271,c_tptpcol_16_25972,c_shavingrazor_manual),c_tptpcol_16_25972).
% 3.95/4.19  97 [hyper,88,20] {-} tptpcol_16_25972(f_relationexistsallfn(c_theprototypicalshavingrazor_manual,c_tptp_8_271,c_tptpcol_16_25972,c_shavingrazor_manual)).
% 3.95/4.19  101 [hyper,71,39,97] {-} $F.
% 3.95/4.19  
% 3.95/4.19  % SZS output end Refutation
% 3.95/4.19  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 3.95/4.19  
% 3.95/4.19  
% 3.95/4.19  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 3.95/4.19  
% 3.95/4.19  
% 3.95/4.19  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 3.95/4.19  
% 3.95/4.19  ============ end of search ============
% 3.95/4.19  
% 3.95/4.19  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 3.95/4.19  
% 3.95/4.19  true clauses given           9      (19.6%)
% 3.95/4.19  false clauses given         37
% 3.95/4.19  
% 3.95/4.19        FALSE     TRUE
% 3.95/4.19     2  0         4
% 3.95/4.19     3  0         9
% 3.95/4.19     7  0         2
% 3.95/4.19  tot:  0         15      (100.0% true)
% 3.95/4.19  
% 3.95/4.19  
% 3.95/4.19  Model 29 [ 187 21 237789 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 3.95/4.19  
% 3.95/4.19  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 3.95/4.19  
% 3.95/4.19  Process 19360 finished Fri Jun 10 01:41:22 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------