%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR066+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:16:27 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.31s 0.61s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.31s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 24 ( 8 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 46 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 39 ( 17 ~; 12 |; 4 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 6 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 6 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 10 ( 10 usr; 6 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 25 ( 0 sgn 15 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query166,conjecture,
? [X15] :
( mtvisible(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_webnjiteducjohnsontreebiochhtm)),c_translation_21))
=> ( tptpcol_16_25972(X15)
& tptp_8_271(X15,c_theprototypicalshavingrazor_manual) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query166) ).
fof(ax2_3627,axiom,
! [X7] :
( shavingrazor_manual(X7)
=> tptp_8_271(f_relationexistsallfn(X7,c_tptp_8_271,c_tptpcol_16_25972,c_shavingrazor_manual),X7) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_3627) ).
fof(ax2_195,axiom,
shavingrazor_manual(c_theprototypicalshavingrazor_manual),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_195) ).
fof(ax2_5089,axiom,
! [X15] :
( isa(X15,c_tptpcol_16_25972)
=> tptpcol_16_25972(X15) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_5089) ).
fof(ax2_7743,axiom,
! [X15] :
( shavingrazor_manual(X15)
=> isa(X15,c_shavingrazor_manual) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_7743) ).
fof(ax2_453,axiom,
! [X7,X8,X9,X10] :
( ( relationexistsall(X9,X10,X8)
& isa(X7,X8) )
=> isa(f_relationexistsallfn(X7,X9,X10,X8),X10) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_453) ).
fof(ax2_3628,axiom,
relationexistsall(c_tptp_8_271,c_tptpcol_16_25972,c_shavingrazor_manual),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_3628) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X15] :
( mtvisible(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_webnjiteducjohnsontreebiochhtm)),c_translation_21))
=> ( tptpcol_16_25972(X15)
& tptp_8_271(X15,c_theprototypicalshavingrazor_manual) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query166]) ).
fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
! [X23] :
( ( ~ tptpcol_16_25972(X23)
| ~ tptp_8_271(X23,c_theprototypicalshavingrazor_manual) )
& mtvisible(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_webnjiteducjohnsontreebiochhtm)),c_translation_21)) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X28] :
( tptp_8_271(f_relationexistsallfn(X28,c_tptp_8_271,c_tptpcol_16_25972,c_shavingrazor_manual),X28)
| ~ shavingrazor_manual(X28) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_3627])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
( ~ tptpcol_16_25972(X1)
| ~ tptp_8_271(X1,c_theprototypicalshavingrazor_manual) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ shavingrazor_manual(X1)
| tptp_8_271(f_relationexistsallfn(X1,c_tptp_8_271,c_tptpcol_16_25972,c_shavingrazor_manual),X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
shavingrazor_manual(c_theprototypicalshavingrazor_manual),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax2_195]) ).
fof(c_0_13,plain,
! [X24] :
( tptpcol_16_25972(X24)
| ~ isa(X24,c_tptpcol_16_25972) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_5089])])]) ).
fof(c_0_14,plain,
! [X31] :
( isa(X31,c_shavingrazor_manual)
| ~ shavingrazor_manual(X31) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_7743])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
~ tptpcol_16_25972(f_relationexistsallfn(c_theprototypicalshavingrazor_manual,c_tptp_8_271,c_tptpcol_16_25972,c_shavingrazor_manual)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12])]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( ~ isa(X1,c_tptpcol_16_25972)
| tptpcol_16_25972(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
fof(c_0_17,plain,
! [X35,X36,X37,X38] :
( isa(f_relationexistsallfn(X35,X37,X38,X36),X38)
| ~ relationexistsall(X37,X38,X36)
| ~ isa(X35,X36) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_453])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( ~ shavingrazor_manual(X1)
| isa(X1,c_shavingrazor_manual) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
~ isa(f_relationexistsallfn(c_theprototypicalshavingrazor_manual,c_tptp_8_271,c_tptpcol_16_25972,c_shavingrazor_manual),c_tptpcol_16_25972),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( ~ relationexistsall(X3,X4,X2)
| ~ isa(X1,X2)
| isa(f_relationexistsallfn(X1,X3,X4,X2),X4) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
relationexistsall(c_tptp_8_271,c_tptpcol_16_25972,c_shavingrazor_manual),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax2_3628]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
isa(c_theprototypicalshavingrazor_manual,c_shavingrazor_manual),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_21]),c_0_22])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : CSR066+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/0.36 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.14/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.14/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:46:22 UTC 2026
% 0.14/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.31/0.61 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.31/0.61 % Preprocessing class: FMLLMMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.31/0.61 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.31/0.61 % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.31/0.61 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.31/0.61 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.31/0.61 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.31/0.61 % new_bool_3 with pid 1715262 completed with status 0
% 0.31/0.61 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.31/0.61 % Preprocessing class: FMLLMMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.31/0.61 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.31/0.61 % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.31/0.61 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.31/0.61 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.31/0.61 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.31/0.61 % Search class: FHHNS-FFSM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.31/0.61 % partial match(1): FHHNS-FFMM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.31/0.61 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.31/0.61 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.31/0.61 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1715267 completed with status 0
% 0.31/0.61 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.31/0.61 % Preprocessing class: FMLLMMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.31/0.61 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.31/0.61 % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.31/0.61 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.31/0.61 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.31/0.61 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.31/0.61 % Search class: FHHNS-FFSM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.31/0.61 % partial match(1): FHHNS-FFMM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.31/0.61 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.31/0.61 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.31/0.61 % Preprocessing time : 0.006 s
% 0.31/0.61
% 0.31/0.61 % Proof found!
% 0.31/0.61 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.31/0.61 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.31/0.61 % Parsed axioms : 8006
% 0.31/0.61 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 7978
% 0.31/0.61 % Initial clauses : 29
% 0.31/0.61 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.31/0.61 % Initial clauses in saturation : 29
% 0.31/0.61 % Processed clauses : 44
% 0.31/0.61 % ...of these trivial : 3
% 0.31/0.61 % ...subsumed : 2
% 0.31/0.61 % ...remaining for further processing : 39
% 0.31/0.61 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.31/0.61 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.31/0.61 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.31/0.61 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.31/0.61 % Generated clauses : 25
% 0.31/0.61 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 16
% 0.31/0.61 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.31/0.61 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.31/0.61 % Paramodulations : 25
% 0.31/0.61 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.31/0.61 % NegExts : 0
% 0.31/0.61 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.31/0.61 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.31/0.61 % Total rewrite steps : 14
% 0.31/0.61 % ...of those cached : 7
% 0.31/0.61 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.31/0.61 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.31/0.61 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.31/0.61 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.31/0.61 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.31/0.61 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.31/0.61 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.31/0.61 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.31/0.61 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.31/0.61 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.31/0.61 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.31/0.61 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.31/0.61 % Current number of processed clauses : 39
% 0.31/0.61 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 17
% 0.31/0.61 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.31/0.61 % Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.31/0.61 % Non-unit-clauses : 20
% 0.31/0.61 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1
% 0.31/0.61 % ...number of literals in the above : 3
% 0.31/0.61 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.31/0.61 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.31/0.61 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 42
% 0.31/0.61 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 38
% 0.31/0.61 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 2
% 0.31/0.61 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 6
% 0.31/0.61 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.31/0.61 % BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.31/0.61 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.31/0.61 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.31/0.61 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.31/0.61 % Termbank termtop insertions : 52542
% 0.31/0.61 % Search garbage collected termcells : 31069
% 0.31/0.61
% 0.31/0.61 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.31/0.61 % User time : 0.036 s
% 0.31/0.61 % System time : 0.024 s
% 0.31/0.61 % Total time : 0.060 s
% 0.31/0.61 % Maximum resident set size: 20084 pages
% 0.31/0.61
% 0.31/0.61 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.31/0.61 % User time : 0.152 s
% 0.31/0.61 % System time : 0.038 s
% 0.31/0.61 % Total time : 0.190 s
% 0.31/0.61 % Maximum resident set size: 11008 pages
% 0.31/0.61 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------