%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR066+4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:16:27 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 1.99s 6.64s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.99s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 24 ( 8 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 46 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 39 ( 17 ~; 12 |; 4 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 6 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 6 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 10 ( 10 usr; 6 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 25 ( 0 sgn 15 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query216,conjecture,
? [X16] :
( mtvisible(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_webnjiteducjohnsontreebiochhtm)),c_translation_21))
=> ( tptpcol_16_25972(X16)
& tptp_8_271(X16,c_theprototypicalshavingrazor_manual) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query216) ).
fof(ax3_1502,axiom,
! [X5] :
( shavingrazor_manual(X5)
=> tptp_8_271(f_relationexistsallfn(X5,c_tptp_8_271,c_tptpcol_16_25972,c_shavingrazor_manual),X5) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_1502) ).
fof(ax3_3201,axiom,
shavingrazor_manual(c_theprototypicalshavingrazor_manual),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_3201) ).
fof(ax3_43031,axiom,
! [X16] :
( isa(X16,c_tptpcol_16_25972)
=> tptpcol_16_25972(X16) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_43031) ).
fof(ax3_43030,axiom,
! [X16] :
( shavingrazor_manual(X16)
=> isa(X16,c_shavingrazor_manual) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_43030) ).
fof(ax3_4485,axiom,
! [X5,X9,X10,X11] :
( ( relationexistsall(X10,X11,X9)
& isa(X5,X9) )
=> isa(f_relationexistsallfn(X5,X10,X11,X9),X11) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_4485) ).
fof(ax3_1503,axiom,
relationexistsall(c_tptp_8_271,c_tptpcol_16_25972,c_shavingrazor_manual),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_1503) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X16] :
( mtvisible(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_webnjiteducjohnsontreebiochhtm)),c_translation_21))
=> ( tptpcol_16_25972(X16)
& tptp_8_271(X16,c_theprototypicalshavingrazor_manual) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query216]) ).
fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
! [X24] :
( ( ~ tptpcol_16_25972(X24)
| ~ tptp_8_271(X24,c_theprototypicalshavingrazor_manual) )
& mtvisible(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_webnjiteducjohnsontreebiochhtm)),c_translation_21)) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X29] :
( tptp_8_271(f_relationexistsallfn(X29,c_tptp_8_271,c_tptpcol_16_25972,c_shavingrazor_manual),X29)
| ~ shavingrazor_manual(X29) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_1502])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
( ~ tptpcol_16_25972(X1)
| ~ tptp_8_271(X1,c_theprototypicalshavingrazor_manual) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ shavingrazor_manual(X1)
| tptp_8_271(f_relationexistsallfn(X1,c_tptp_8_271,c_tptpcol_16_25972,c_shavingrazor_manual),X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
shavingrazor_manual(c_theprototypicalshavingrazor_manual),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax3_3201]) ).
fof(c_0_13,plain,
! [X25] :
( tptpcol_16_25972(X25)
| ~ isa(X25,c_tptpcol_16_25972) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_43031])])]) ).
fof(c_0_14,plain,
! [X32] :
( isa(X32,c_shavingrazor_manual)
| ~ shavingrazor_manual(X32) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_43030])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
~ tptpcol_16_25972(f_relationexistsallfn(c_theprototypicalshavingrazor_manual,c_tptp_8_271,c_tptpcol_16_25972,c_shavingrazor_manual)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12])]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( ~ isa(X1,c_tptpcol_16_25972)
| tptpcol_16_25972(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
fof(c_0_17,plain,
! [X36,X37,X38,X39] :
( isa(f_relationexistsallfn(X36,X38,X39,X37),X39)
| ~ relationexistsall(X38,X39,X37)
| ~ isa(X36,X37) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_4485])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( ~ shavingrazor_manual(X1)
| isa(X1,c_shavingrazor_manual) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
~ isa(f_relationexistsallfn(c_theprototypicalshavingrazor_manual,c_tptp_8_271,c_tptpcol_16_25972,c_shavingrazor_manual),c_tptpcol_16_25972),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( ~ relationexistsall(X3,X4,X2)
| ~ isa(X1,X2)
| isa(f_relationexistsallfn(X1,X3,X4,X2),X4) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
relationexistsall(c_tptp_8_271,c_tptpcol_16_25972,c_shavingrazor_manual),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax3_1503]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
isa(c_theprototypicalshavingrazor_manual,c_shavingrazor_manual),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_21]),c_0_22])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : CSR066+4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/5.38 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.12/5.38 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/5.38 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/5.38 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/5.38 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/5.38 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/5.38 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/5.38 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:44:01 UTC 2026
% 0.12/5.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/5.38 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.16/5.43 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.16/5.43 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.99/6.64 % Version: 3.5.1
% 1.99/6.64 % Preprocessing class: FMLLLMSLSSSNFFN.
% 1.99/6.64 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.99/6.64 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.99/6.64 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.99/6.64 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.99/6.64 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 1.99/6.64 % new_bool_1 with pid 1235748 completed with status 0
% 1.99/6.64 % Result found by new_bool_1
% 1.99/6.64 % Preprocessing class: FMLLLMSLSSSNFFN.
% 1.99/6.64 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.99/6.64 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.99/6.64 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.99/6.64 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.99/6.64 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 1.99/6.64 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 1.99/6.64 % Search class: FHHNM-SSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 1.99/6.64 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 1.99/6.64 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 1.99/6.64 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1235750 completed with status 0
% 1.99/6.64 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 1.99/6.64 % Preprocessing class: FMLLLMSLSSSNFFN.
% 1.99/6.64 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.99/6.64 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.99/6.64 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.99/6.64 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.99/6.64 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 1.99/6.64 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 1.99/6.64 % Search class: FHHNM-SSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 1.99/6.64 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 1.99/6.64 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 1.99/6.64 % Preprocessing time : 0.042 s
% 1.99/6.64
% 1.99/6.64 % Proof found!
% 1.99/6.64 % SZS status Theorem
% 1.99/6.64 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.99/6.64 % Parsed axioms : 44217
% 1.99/6.64 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 42823
% 1.99/6.64 % Initial clauses : 1395
% 1.99/6.64 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 1.99/6.64 % Initial clauses in saturation : 1395
% 1.99/6.64 % Processed clauses : 1430
% 1.99/6.64 % ...of these trivial : 27
% 1.99/6.64 % ...subsumed : 6
% 1.99/6.64 % ...remaining for further processing : 1397
% 1.99/6.64 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 1.99/6.64 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 1.99/6.64 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 1.99/6.64 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 1.99/6.64 % Generated clauses : 5461
% 1.99/6.64 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1844
% 1.99/6.64 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 1.99/6.64 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 1.99/6.64 % Paramodulations : 5461
% 1.99/6.64 % Factorizations : 0
% 1.99/6.64 % NegExts : 0
% 1.99/6.64 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 1.99/6.64 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 1.99/6.64 % Total rewrite steps : 3640
% 1.99/6.64 % ...of those cached : 2951
% 1.99/6.64 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 1.99/6.64 % Propositional check models : 0
% 1.99/6.64 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 1.99/6.64 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 1.99/6.64 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 1.99/6.64 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 1.99/6.64 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 1.99/6.64 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 1.99/6.64 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 1.99/6.64 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 1.99/6.64 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 1.99/6.64 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 1.99/6.64 % Current number of processed clauses : 1397
% 1.99/6.64 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 1378
% 1.99/6.64 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 1.99/6.64 % Negative unit clauses : 2
% 1.99/6.64 % Non-unit-clauses : 17
% 1.99/6.64 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1809
% 1.99/6.64 % ...number of literals in the above : 3620
% 1.99/6.64 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 1.99/6.64 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 1.99/6.64 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 132
% 1.99/6.64 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 109
% 1.99/6.64 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 6
% 1.99/6.64 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 39
% 1.99/6.64 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 1.99/6.64 % BW rewrite match attempts : 15068
% 1.99/6.64 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 1.99/6.64 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 1.99/6.64 % Condensation successes : 0
% 1.99/6.64 % Termbank termtop insertions : 380557
% 1.99/6.64 % Search garbage collected termcells : 154259
% 1.99/6.64
% 1.99/6.64 % -------------------------------------------------
% 1.99/6.64 % User time : 0.233 s
% 1.99/6.64 % System time : 0.141 s
% 1.99/6.64 % Total time : 0.373 s
% 1.99/6.64 % Maximum resident set size: 84020 pages
% 1.99/6.64
% 1.99/6.64 % -------------------------------------------------
% 1.99/6.64 % User time : 0.954 s
% 1.99/6.64 % System time : 0.203 s
% 1.99/6.64 % Total time : 1.157 s
% 1.99/6.64 % Maximum resident set size: 38144 pages
% 1.99/6.64 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------