%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR066+5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v3.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:16:27 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 73.26s 29.76s
% Output : CNFRefutation 73.26s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 24 ( 7 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 48 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 43 ( 19 ~; 14 |; 4 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 6 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 6 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 10 ( 10 usr; 6 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 28 ( 0 sgn 15 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query266,conjecture,
? [X23] :
( mtvisible(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_webnjiteducjohnsontreebiochhtm)),c_translation_21))
=> ( tptpcol_16_25972(X23)
& tptp_8_271(X23,c_theprototypicalshavingrazor_manual) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query266) ).
fof(ax4_142113,axiom,
! [X6] :
( shavingrazor_manual(X6)
=> tptp_8_271(f_relationexistsallfn(X6,c_tptp_8_271,c_tptpcol_16_25972,c_shavingrazor_manual),X6) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+4.ax',ax4_142113) ).
fof(ax4_407582,axiom,
! [X23] :
( isa(X23,c_tptpcol_16_25972)
=> tptpcol_16_25972(X23) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+4.ax',ax4_407582) ).
fof(ax4_46691,axiom,
! [X6,X9,X10,X11] :
( ( relationexistsall(X10,X11,X9)
& isa(X6,X9) )
=> isa(f_relationexistsallfn(X6,X10,X11,X9),X11) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+4.ax',ax4_46691) ).
fof(ax4_3273,axiom,
shavingrazor_manual(c_theprototypicalshavingrazor_manual),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+4.ax',ax4_3273) ).
fof(ax4_142114,axiom,
relationexistsall(c_tptp_8_271,c_tptpcol_16_25972,c_shavingrazor_manual),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+4.ax',ax4_142114) ).
fof(ax4_538309,axiom,
! [X23] :
( shavingrazor_manual(X23)
=> isa(X23,c_shavingrazor_manual) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+4.ax',ax4_538309) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X23] :
( mtvisible(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_webnjiteducjohnsontreebiochhtm)),c_translation_21))
=> ( tptpcol_16_25972(X23)
& tptp_8_271(X23,c_theprototypicalshavingrazor_manual) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query266]) ).
fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
! [X30] :
( ( ~ tptpcol_16_25972(X30)
| ~ tptp_8_271(X30,c_theprototypicalshavingrazor_manual) )
& mtvisible(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_webnjiteducjohnsontreebiochhtm)),c_translation_21)) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X38] :
( tptp_8_271(f_relationexistsallfn(X38,c_tptp_8_271,c_tptpcol_16_25972,c_shavingrazor_manual),X38)
| ~ shavingrazor_manual(X38) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax4_142113])])]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X31] :
( tptpcol_16_25972(X31)
| ~ isa(X31,c_tptpcol_16_25972) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax4_407582])])]) ).
fof(c_0_11,plain,
! [X54,X55,X56,X57] :
( isa(f_relationexistsallfn(X54,X56,X57,X55),X57)
| ~ relationexistsall(X56,X57,X55)
| ~ isa(X54,X55) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax4_46691])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
( ~ tptpcol_16_25972(X1)
| ~ tptp_8_271(X1,c_theprototypicalshavingrazor_manual) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( ~ shavingrazor_manual(X1)
| tptp_8_271(f_relationexistsallfn(X1,c_tptp_8_271,c_tptpcol_16_25972,c_shavingrazor_manual),X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
shavingrazor_manual(c_theprototypicalshavingrazor_manual),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax4_3273]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ~ isa(X1,c_tptpcol_16_25972)
| tptpcol_16_25972(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( ~ relationexistsall(X3,X4,X2)
| ~ isa(X1,X2)
| isa(f_relationexistsallfn(X1,X3,X4,X2),X4) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
~ tptpcol_16_25972(f_relationexistsallfn(c_theprototypicalshavingrazor_manual,c_tptp_8_271,c_tptpcol_16_25972,c_shavingrazor_manual)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14])]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( ~ isa(X1,X3)
| ~ relationexistsall(X2,c_tptpcol_16_25972,X3)
| tptpcol_16_25972(f_relationexistsallfn(X1,X2,c_tptpcol_16_25972,X3)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
relationexistsall(c_tptp_8_271,c_tptpcol_16_25972,c_shavingrazor_manual),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax4_142114]) ).
fof(c_0_20,plain,
! [X113] :
( isa(X113,c_shavingrazor_manual)
| ~ shavingrazor_manual(X113) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax4_538309])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
~ isa(c_theprototypicalshavingrazor_manual,c_shavingrazor_manual),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_19])]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( ~ shavingrazor_manual(X1)
| isa(X1,c_shavingrazor_manual) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),c_0_14])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : CSR066+5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v3.5.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.35 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.35 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.35 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:48:09 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.35 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/0.39 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.39 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 73.26/29.76 % Version: 3.5.1
% 73.26/29.76 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 73.26/29.76 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 285 seconds (2280 total)
% 73.26/29.76 % Starting new_ho_10 with 570s (2) cores
% 73.26/29.76 % Starting sh3 with 570s (2) cores
% 73.26/29.76 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 570s (2) cores
% 73.26/29.76 % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 570s (2) cores
% 73.26/29.76 % new_ho_10 with pid 2681890 completed with status 0
% 73.26/29.76 % Result found by new_ho_10
% 73.26/29.76 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 73.26/29.76 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 285 seconds (2280 total)
% 73.26/29.76 % Starting new_ho_10 with 570s (2) cores
% 73.26/29.76 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 73.26/29.76 % SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 73.26/29.76 % Search class: FHHSM-SMLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 73.26/29.76 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 2 cores with 565 seconds (565 total)
% 73.26/29.76 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 51s (1) cores
% 73.26/29.76 % Starting new_ho_10 with 57s (1) cores
% 73.26/29.76 % new_ho_10 with pid 2681897 completed with status 0
% 73.26/29.76 % Result found by new_ho_10
% 73.26/29.76 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 73.26/29.76 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 285 seconds (2280 total)
% 73.26/29.76 % Starting new_ho_10 with 570s (2) cores
% 73.26/29.76 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 73.26/29.76 % SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 73.26/29.76 % Search class: FHHSM-SMLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 73.26/29.76 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 2 cores with 565 seconds (565 total)
% 73.26/29.76 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 51s (1) cores
% 73.26/29.76 % Starting new_ho_10 with 57s (1) cores
% 73.26/29.76 % Preprocessing time : 0.388 s
% 73.26/29.76 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 73.26/29.76
% 73.26/29.76 % Proof found!
% 73.26/29.76 % SZS status Theorem
% 73.26/29.76 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 73.26/29.76 % Parsed axioms : 540250
% 73.26/29.76 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 534642
% 73.26/29.76 % Initial clauses : 5609
% 73.26/29.76 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 2
% 73.26/29.76 % Initial clauses in saturation : 5607
% 73.26/29.76 % Processed clauses : 20039
% 73.26/29.76 % ...of these trivial : 370
% 73.26/29.76 % ...subsumed : 803
% 73.26/29.76 % ...remaining for further processing : 18866
% 73.26/29.76 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 73.26/29.76 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 73.26/29.76 % Backward-subsumed : 39
% 73.26/29.76 % Backward-rewritten : 137
% 73.26/29.76 % Generated clauses : 62158
% 73.26/29.76 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 45143
% 73.26/29.76 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 73.26/29.76 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 6
% 73.26/29.76 % Paramodulations : 62157
% 73.26/29.76 % Factorizations : 0
% 73.26/29.76 % NegExts : 0
% 73.26/29.76 % Equation resolutions : 1
% 73.26/29.76 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 73.26/29.76 % Total rewrite steps : 20613
% 73.26/29.76 % ...of those cached : 15648
% 73.26/29.76 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 73.26/29.76 % Propositional check models : 0
% 73.26/29.76 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 73.26/29.76 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 73.26/29.76 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 73.26/29.76 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 73.26/29.76 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 73.26/29.76 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 73.26/29.76 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 73.26/29.76 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 73.26/29.76 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 73.26/29.76 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 73.26/29.76 % Current number of processed clauses : 13461
% 73.26/29.76 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 4877
% 73.26/29.76 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 73.26/29.76 % Negative unit clauses : 224
% 73.26/29.76 % Non-unit-clauses : 8360
% 73.26/29.76 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 35778
% 73.26/29.76 % ...number of literals in the above : 100952
% 73.26/29.76 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 73.26/29.76 % Current number of archived clauses : 5404
% 73.26/29.76 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 10157186
% 73.26/29.76 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7327287
% 73.26/29.76 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 813
% 73.26/29.76 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 123125
% 73.26/29.76 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 73.26/29.76 % BW rewrite match attempts : 134069
% 73.26/29.76 % BW rewrite match successes : 96
% 73.26/29.76 % Condensation attempts : 20144
% 73.26/29.76 % Condensation successes : 0
% 73.26/29.76 % Termbank termtop insertions : 4497743
% 73.26/29.76 % Search garbage collected termcells : 2164080
% 73.26/29.76
% 73.26/29.76 % -------------------------------------------------
% 73.26/29.76 % User time : 9.200 s
% 73.26/29.76 % System time : 2.784 s
% 73.26/29.76 % Total time : 11.984 s
% 73.26/29.76 % Maximum resident set size: 1242144 pages
% 73.26/29.76
% 73.26/29.76 % -------------------------------------------------
% 73.26/29.76 % User time : 29.311 s
% 73.26/29.76 % System time : 5.035 s
% 73.26/29.76 % Total time : 34.345 s
% 73.26/29.76 % Maximum resident set size: 456192 pages
% 73.26/29.76 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------