%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : CSR067+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:47:19 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.39s 2.30s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.39s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 10 ( 6 unt; 0 nHn; 10 RR)
% Number of literals : 14 ( 0 equ; 6 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 3 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 6 ( 2 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_1,plain,
( borderson(c_georegion_l4_x29_y75,c_georegion_l4_x29_y76)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-0n2et9dj/input.p',i_0_1) ).
cnf(i_0_31,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-0n2et9dj/input.p',i_0_31) ).
cnf(i_0_28,plain,
( borderson(X1,X2)
| ~ borderson(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-0n2et9dj/input.p',i_0_28) ).
cnf(i_0_30,negated_conjecture,
~ borderson(X1,c_georegion_l4_x29_y75),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-0n2et9dj/input.p',i_0_30) ).
cnf(c_0_36,plain,
( borderson(c_georegion_l4_x29_y75,c_georegion_l4_x29_y76)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
i_0_1 ).
cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt),
i_0_31 ).
cnf(c_0_38,plain,
( borderson(X1,X2)
| ~ borderson(X2,X1) ),
i_0_28 ).
cnf(c_0_39,plain,
borderson(c_georegion_l4_x29_y75,c_georegion_l4_x29_y76),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37])]) ).
cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
~ borderson(X1,c_georegion_l4_x29_y75),
i_0_30 ).
cnf(c_0_41,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_39]),c_0_40]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : CSR067+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Fri Jun 10 19:58:42 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 7.39/2.30 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule:
% 7.39/2.30 # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.39/2.30 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.39/2.30 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic H_____047_C18_F1_PI_AE_R8_CS_SP_S2S
% 7.39/2.30 # and selection function SelectNewComplexAHP.
% 7.39/2.30 #
% 7.39/2.30 # Preprocessing time : 0.012 s
% 7.39/2.30
% 7.39/2.30 # Proof found!
% 7.39/2.30 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.39/2.30 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.39/2.30 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.39/2.30
% 7.39/2.30 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.39/2.30 # User time : 0.013 s
% 7.39/2.30 # System time : 0.005 s
% 7.39/2.30 # Total time : 0.018 s
% 7.39/2.30 # Maximum resident set size: 7120 pages
% 7.39/2.30
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------