%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR067+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:16:27 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.19s 0.47s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 13 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 22 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 16 ( 7 ~; 4 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 3 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 10 ( 1 sgn 5 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query117,conjecture,
? [X5] :
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
=> borderson(X5,c_georegion_l4_x29_y75) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query117) ).
fof(ax1_485,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
=> borderson(c_georegion_l4_x29_y75,c_georegion_l4_x29_y76) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_485) ).
fof(ax1_900,axiom,
! [X13,X14] :
( borderson(X13,X14)
=> borderson(X14,X13) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_900) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X5] :
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
=> borderson(X5,c_georegion_l4_x29_y75) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query117]) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
( borderson(c_georegion_l4_x29_y75,c_georegion_l4_x29_y76)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_485])]) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
! [X22] :
( ~ borderson(X22,c_georegion_l4_x29_y75)
& mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X27,X28] :
( borderson(X28,X27)
| ~ borderson(X27,X28) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_900])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
| borderson(c_georegion_l4_x29_y75,c_georegion_l4_x29_y76) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( ~ borderson(X1,X2)
| borderson(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
borderson(c_georegion_l4_x29_y75,c_georegion_l4_x29_y76),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8])]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
~ borderson(X1,c_georegion_l4_x29_y75),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : CSR067+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.37 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:43:21 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.47 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.19/0.47 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.47 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.47 % Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (3) cores
% 0.19/0.47 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.19/0.47 % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.19/0.47 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.47 % sh5l with pid 1011579 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.47 % Result found by sh5l
% 0.19/0.47 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.47 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.47 % Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (3) cores
% 0.19/0.47 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.19/0.47 % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.19/0.47 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.47 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.19/0.47 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.19/0.47 % Search class: FHHNF-FFMM31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.47 % partial match(1): FHHNF-FFMM11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.47 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.19/0.47 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.47 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1011580 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.47 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.19/0.47 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.47 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.47 % Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (3) cores
% 0.19/0.47 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.19/0.47 % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.19/0.47 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.47 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.19/0.47 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.19/0.47 % Search class: FHHNF-FFMM31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.47 % partial match(1): FHHNF-FFMM11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.47 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.19/0.47 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.47 % Preprocessing time : 0.004 s
% 0.19/0.47
% 0.19/0.47 % Proof found!
% 0.19/0.47 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.47 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.47 % Parsed axioms : 1132
% 0.19/0.47 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 1047
% 0.19/0.47 % Initial clauses : 86
% 0.19/0.47 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.19/0.47 % Initial clauses in saturation : 86
% 0.19/0.47 % Processed clauses : 176
% 0.19/0.47 % ...of these trivial : 1
% 0.19/0.47 % ...subsumed : 16
% 0.19/0.47 % ...remaining for further processing : 159
% 0.19/0.47 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.19/0.47 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.19/0.47 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.19/0.47 % Backward-rewritten : 15
% 0.19/0.47 % Generated clauses : 165
% 0.19/0.47 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 155
% 0.19/0.47 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.19/0.47 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.19/0.47 % Paramodulations : 165
% 0.19/0.47 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.19/0.47 % NegExts : 0
% 0.19/0.47 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.19/0.47 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.19/0.47 % Total rewrite steps : 35
% 0.19/0.47 % ...of those cached : 23
% 0.19/0.47 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.19/0.47 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.19/0.47 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.19/0.47 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.19/0.47 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.19/0.47 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.19/0.47 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.47 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.47 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.47 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.47 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.47 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.47 % Current number of processed clauses : 144
% 0.19/0.47 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 57
% 0.19/0.47 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.19/0.47 % Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.19/0.47 % Non-unit-clauses : 85
% 0.19/0.47 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 65
% 0.19/0.47 % ...number of literals in the above : 134
% 0.19/0.47 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.19/0.47 % Current number of archived clauses : 15
% 0.19/0.47 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1937
% 0.19/0.47 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1905
% 0.19/0.47 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 16
% 0.19/0.47 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 609
% 0.19/0.47 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.19/0.47 % BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 0.19/0.47 % BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.19/0.47 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.19/0.47 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.19/0.47 % Termbank termtop insertions : 12318
% 0.19/0.47 % Search garbage collected termcells : 5048
% 0.19/0.47
% 0.19/0.47 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.47 % User time : 0.014 s
% 0.19/0.47 % System time : 0.006 s
% 0.19/0.47 % Total time : 0.020 s
% 0.19/0.47 % Maximum resident set size: 6144 pages
% 0.19/0.47
% 0.19/0.47 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.47 % User time : 0.031 s
% 0.19/0.47 % System time : 0.012 s
% 0.19/0.47 % Total time : 0.043 s
% 0.19/0.47 % Maximum resident set size: 5632 pages
% 0.19/0.47 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------