%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR068+4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:16:29 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 1.32s 1.42s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.32s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 17 ( 8 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 32 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 27 ( 12 ~; 8 |; 3 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 4 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 9 ( 0 sgn 6 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query218,conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptp_member2356_mt)
=> tptpofobject(c_theprototypicalfurpelt,f_tptpquantityfn_1(n_328)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query218) ).
fof(ax3_5580,axiom,
! [X6] :
( ( furpelt(X6)
& mtvisible(c_tptp_spindleheadmt) )
=> tptpofobject(X6,f_tptpquantityfn_1(n_328)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_5580) ).
fof(ax3_44208,axiom,
! [X22,X23] :
( ( genlmt(X22,X23)
& mtvisible(X22) )
=> mtvisible(X23) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_44208) ).
fof(ax3_10453,axiom,
furpelt(c_theprototypicalfurpelt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_10453) ).
fof(ax3_9650,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptp_member2356_mt,c_tptp_spindleheadmt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_9650) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ ( mtvisible(c_tptp_member2356_mt)
=> tptpofobject(c_theprototypicalfurpelt,f_tptpquantityfn_1(n_328)) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query218]) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
( ~ tptpofobject(c_theprototypicalfurpelt,f_tptpquantityfn_1(n_328))
& mtvisible(c_tptp_member2356_mt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X28] :
( tptpofobject(X28,f_tptpquantityfn_1(n_328))
| ~ furpelt(X28)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_spindleheadmt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_5580])])]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X30,X31] :
( mtvisible(X31)
| ~ genlmt(X30,X31)
| ~ mtvisible(X30) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_44208])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
~ tptpofobject(c_theprototypicalfurpelt,f_tptpquantityfn_1(n_328)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ furpelt(X1)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_spindleheadmt)
| tptpofobject(X1,f_tptpquantityfn_1(n_328)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
furpelt(c_theprototypicalfurpelt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax3_10453]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( ~ genlmt(X1,X2)
| ~ mtvisible(X1)
| mtvisible(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
genlmt(c_tptp_member2356_mt,c_tptp_spindleheadmt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax3_9650]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptp_member2356_mt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
~ mtvisible(c_tptp_spindleheadmt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11])]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14])]),c_0_15]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : CSR068+4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.37 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:43:58 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.32/1.42 % Version: 3.5.1
% 1.32/1.42 % Preprocessing class: FMLLLMSLSSSNFFN.
% 1.32/1.42 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.32/1.42 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.32/1.42 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.32/1.42 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.32/1.42 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 1.32/1.42 % new_bool_3 with pid 3090102 completed with status 0
% 1.32/1.42 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 1.32/1.42 % Preprocessing class: FMLLLMSLSSSNFFN.
% 1.32/1.42 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.32/1.42 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.32/1.42 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.32/1.42 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 1.32/1.42 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 1.32/1.42 % Search class: FHHSM-FFMM31-SFFFFFNN
% 1.32/1.42 % partial match(1): FGHSM-FFMM31-SFFFFFNN
% 1.32/1.42 % Scheduled 11 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 1.32/1.42 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 1.32/1.42 % SubtermCWHack with pid 3090105 completed with status 0
% 1.32/1.42 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 1.32/1.42 % Preprocessing class: FMLLLMSLSSSNFFN.
% 1.32/1.42 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.32/1.42 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.32/1.42 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.32/1.42 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 1.32/1.42 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 1.32/1.42 % Search class: FHHSM-FFMM31-SFFFFFNN
% 1.32/1.42 % partial match(1): FGHSM-FFMM31-SFFFFFNN
% 1.32/1.42 % Scheduled 11 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 1.32/1.42 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 1.32/1.42 % Preprocessing time : 0.018 s
% 1.32/1.42
% 1.32/1.42 % Proof found!
% 1.32/1.42 % SZS status Theorem
% 1.32/1.42 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.32/1.42 % Parsed axioms : 44217
% 1.32/1.42 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 44142
% 1.32/1.42 % Initial clauses : 76
% 1.32/1.42 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 1
% 1.32/1.42 % Initial clauses in saturation : 75
% 1.32/1.42 % Processed clauses : 74
% 1.32/1.42 % ...of these trivial : 9
% 1.32/1.42 % ...subsumed : 9
% 1.32/1.42 % ...remaining for further processing : 56
% 1.32/1.42 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 1.32/1.42 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 1.32/1.42 % Backward-subsumed : 1
% 1.32/1.42 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 1.32/1.42 % Generated clauses : 17
% 1.32/1.42 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 7
% 1.32/1.42 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 1.32/1.42 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 1.32/1.42 % Paramodulations : 16
% 1.32/1.42 % Factorizations : 0
% 1.32/1.42 % NegExts : 0
% 1.32/1.42 % Equation resolutions : 1
% 1.32/1.42 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 1.32/1.42 % Total rewrite steps : 12
% 1.32/1.42 % ...of those cached : 5
% 1.32/1.42 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 1.32/1.42 % Propositional check models : 0
% 1.32/1.42 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 1.32/1.42 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 1.32/1.42 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 1.32/1.42 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 1.32/1.42 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 1.32/1.42 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 1.32/1.42 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 1.32/1.42 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 1.32/1.42 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 1.32/1.42 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 1.32/1.42 % Current number of processed clauses : 54
% 1.32/1.42 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 38
% 1.32/1.42 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 1.32/1.42 % Negative unit clauses : 2
% 1.32/1.42 % Non-unit-clauses : 14
% 1.32/1.42 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 7
% 1.32/1.42 % ...number of literals in the above : 11
% 1.32/1.42 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 1.32/1.42 % Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 1.32/1.42 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 62
% 1.32/1.42 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 54
% 1.32/1.42 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 8
% 1.32/1.42 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7
% 1.32/1.42 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 1.32/1.42 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 1.32/1.42 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 1.32/1.42 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 1.32/1.42 % Condensation successes : 0
% 1.32/1.42 % Termbank termtop insertions : 294734
% 1.32/1.42 % Search garbage collected termcells : 157706
% 1.32/1.42
% 1.32/1.42 % -------------------------------------------------
% 1.32/1.42 % User time : 0.119 s
% 1.32/1.42 % System time : 0.070 s
% 1.32/1.42 % Total time : 0.189 s
% 1.32/1.42 % Maximum resident set size: 84020 pages
% 1.32/1.42
% 1.32/1.42 % -------------------------------------------------
% 1.32/1.42 % User time : 0.853 s
% 1.32/1.42 % System time : 0.122 s
% 1.32/1.42 % Total time : 0.975 s
% 1.32/1.42 % Maximum resident set size: 38144 pages
% 1.32/1.42 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------