%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR068-10 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:16:28 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.95s 1.45s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.95s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 23 ( 23 unt; 0 nHn; 14 RR)
% Number of literals : 23 ( 22 equ; 3 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 14 ( 14 usr; 7 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 19 ( 4 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(ax3_44208,axiom,
ifeq4(genlmt(X1,X2),true,ifeq4(mtvisible(X1),true,mtvisible(X2),true),true) = true,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax3_44208) ).
cnf(ax3_9650,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptp_member2356_mt,c_tptp_spindleheadmt) = true,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax3_9650) ).
cnf(query218,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptp_member2356_mt) = true,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query218) ).
cnf(ifeq_axiom,axiom,
ifeq4(X1,X1,X2,X3) = X2,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ifeq_axiom) ).
cnf(ax3_5580,axiom,
ifeq4(furpelt(X1),true,ifeq4(mtvisible(c_tptp_spindleheadmt),true,tptpofobject(X1,f_tptpquantityfn_1(n_328)),true),true) = true,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax3_5580) ).
cnf(ax3_10453,axiom,
furpelt(c_theprototypicalfurpelt) = true,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax3_10453) ).
cnf(goal,negated_conjecture,
a != b,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goal) ).
cnf(query218_1,negated_conjecture,
ifeq3(tptpofobject(c_theprototypicalfurpelt,f_tptpquantityfn_1(n_328)),true,a,b) = b,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query218_1) ).
cnf(ifeq_axiom_001,axiom,
ifeq3(X1,X1,X2,X3) = X2,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ifeq_axiom_001) ).
cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
ifeq4(genlmt(X1,X2),true,ifeq4(mtvisible(X1),true,mtvisible(X2),true),true) = true,
ax3_44208 ).
cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptp_member2356_mt,c_tptp_spindleheadmt) = true,
ax3_9650 ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptp_member2356_mt) = true,
query218 ).
cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
ifeq4(X1,X1,X2,X3) = X2,
ifeq_axiom ).
cnf(c_0_13,axiom,
ifeq4(furpelt(X1),true,ifeq4(mtvisible(c_tptp_spindleheadmt),true,tptpofobject(X1,f_tptpquantityfn_1(n_328)),true),true) = true,
ax3_5580 ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
mtvisible(c_tptp_spindleheadmt) = true,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11]),c_0_12]),c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
ifeq4(furpelt(X1),true,tptpofobject(X1,f_tptpquantityfn_1(n_328)),true) = true,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,axiom,
furpelt(c_theprototypicalfurpelt) = true,
ax3_10453 ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
a != b,
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[goal]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
ifeq3(tptpofobject(c_theprototypicalfurpelt,f_tptpquantityfn_1(n_328)),true,a,b) = b,
query218_1 ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
tptpofobject(c_theprototypicalfurpelt,f_tptpquantityfn_1(n_328)) = true,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,axiom,
ifeq3(X1,X1,X2,X3) = X2,
ifeq_axiom_001 ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
a != b,
c_0_17 ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_20]),c_0_21]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : CSR068-10 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.38 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.38 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.38 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.38 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.38 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.38 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.38 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.38 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:46:38 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.38 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.44 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.44 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.95/1.45 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.95/1.45 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.95/1.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.95/1.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 900s (3) cores
% 0.95/1.45 % Starting new_bool_1 with 900s (3) cores
% 0.95/1.45 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.95/1.45 % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 300s (1) cores
% 0.95/1.45 % new_bool_3 with pid 1715666 completed with status 0
% 0.95/1.45 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.95/1.45 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.95/1.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.95/1.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 900s (3) cores
% 0.95/1.45 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.95/1.45 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.95/1.45 % Search class: FUUPM-FFMM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.95/1.45 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 3 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
% 0.95/1.45 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 91s (1) cores
% 0.95/1.45 % Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 541s (1) cores
% 0.95/1.45 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 91s (1) cores
% 0.95/1.45 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1715670 completed with status 0
% 0.95/1.45 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.95/1.45 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.95/1.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.95/1.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 900s (3) cores
% 0.95/1.45 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.95/1.45 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.95/1.45 % Search class: FUUPM-FFMM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.95/1.45 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 3 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
% 0.95/1.45 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 91s (1) cores
% 0.95/1.45 % Preprocessing time : 0.018 s
% 0.95/1.45
% 0.95/1.45 % Proof found!
% 0.95/1.45 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.95/1.45 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.95/1.45 % Parsed axioms : 44220
% 0.95/1.45 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 44144
% 0.95/1.45 % Initial clauses : 76
% 0.95/1.45 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.95/1.45 % Initial clauses in saturation : 76
% 0.95/1.45 % Processed clauses : 111
% 0.95/1.45 % ...of these trivial : 14
% 0.95/1.45 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.95/1.45 % ...remaining for further processing : 97
% 0.95/1.45 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.95/1.45 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.95/1.45 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.95/1.45 % Backward-rewritten : 3
% 0.95/1.45 % Generated clauses : 118
% 0.95/1.45 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 51
% 0.95/1.45 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.95/1.45 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.95/1.45 % Paramodulations : 118
% 0.95/1.45 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.95/1.45 % NegExts : 0
% 0.95/1.45 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.95/1.45 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.95/1.45 % Total rewrite steps : 150
% 0.95/1.45 % ...of those cached : 89
% 0.95/1.45 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.95/1.45 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.95/1.45 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.95/1.45 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.95/1.45 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.95/1.45 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.95/1.45 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.95/1.45 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.95/1.45 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.95/1.45 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.95/1.45 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.95/1.45 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.95/1.45 % Current number of processed clauses : 94
% 0.95/1.45 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 93
% 0.95/1.45 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.95/1.45 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.95/1.45 % Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.95/1.45 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 16
% 0.95/1.45 % ...number of literals in the above : 16
% 0.95/1.45 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.95/1.45 % Current number of archived clauses : 3
% 0.95/1.45 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.95/1.45 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.95/1.45 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.95/1.45 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.95/1.45 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.95/1.45 % BW rewrite match attempts : 14
% 0.95/1.45 % BW rewrite match successes : 3
% 0.95/1.45 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.95/1.45 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.95/1.45 % Termbank termtop insertions : 335805
% 0.95/1.45 % Search garbage collected termcells : 126199
% 0.95/1.45
% 0.95/1.45 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.95/1.45 % User time : 0.114 s
% 0.95/1.45 % System time : 0.084 s
% 0.95/1.45 % Total time : 0.198 s
% 0.95/1.45 % Maximum resident set size: 80412 pages
% 0.95/1.45
% 0.95/1.45 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.95/1.45 % User time : 0.894 s
% 0.95/1.45 % System time : 0.180 s
% 0.95/1.45 % Total time : 1.075 s
% 0.95/1.45 % Maximum resident set size: 34560 pages
% 0.95/1.45 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------