%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Princess---230619 % Problem : CSR069+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp % Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s % Computer : n002.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Wed Aug 30 21:37:09 EDT 2023 % Result : Theorem 4.15s 1.33s % Output : Proof 6.93s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.06/0.12 % Problem : CSR069+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0. % 0.06/0.13 % Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s % 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n002.cluster.edu % 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Aug 28 10:58:19 EDT 2023 % 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime : % 0.19/0.60 ________ _____ % 0.19/0.60 ___ __ \_________(_)________________________________ % 0.19/0.60 __ /_/ /_ ___/_ /__ __ \ ___/ _ \_ ___/_ ___/ % 0.19/0.60 _ ____/_ / _ / _ / / / /__ / __/(__ )_(__ ) % 0.19/0.60 /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/ % 0.19/0.60 % 0.19/0.60 A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic % 0.19/0.60 (2023-06-19) % 0.19/0.60 % 0.19/0.60 (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023 % 0.19/0.60 Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen, % 0.19/0.60 Amanda Stjerna. % 0.19/0.60 Free software under BSD-3-Clause. % 0.19/0.60 % 0.19/0.60 For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml % 0.19/0.60 % 0.19/0.60 Loading /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... % 0.19/0.61 Running up to 7 provers in parallel. % 0.19/0.63 Prover 2: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994 % 0.19/0.63 Prover 0: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893 % 0.19/0.63 Prover 3: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996 % 0.19/0.63 Prover 1: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423 % 0.19/0.63 Prover 4: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696 % 0.19/0.63 Prover 5: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288 % 0.19/0.63 Prover 6: Options: -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365 % 2.48/1.03 Prover 4: Preprocessing ... % 2.48/1.03 Prover 1: Preprocessing ... % 2.98/1.07 Prover 3: Preprocessing ... % 2.98/1.07 Prover 5: Preprocessing ... % 2.98/1.07 Prover 6: Preprocessing ... % 2.98/1.07 Prover 2: Preprocessing ... % 2.98/1.07 Prover 0: Preprocessing ... % 4.15/1.28 Prover 5: Constructing countermodel ... % 4.15/1.28 Prover 2: Constructing countermodel ... % 4.15/1.31 Prover 2: proved (690ms) % 4.15/1.31 % 4.15/1.33 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 4.15/1.33 % 4.15/1.33 Prover 5: proved (688ms) % 4.15/1.33 % 4.15/1.33 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 4.15/1.33 % 4.15/1.34 Prover 7: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470 % 4.15/1.34 Prover 8: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089 % 4.15/1.37 Prover 7: Preprocessing ... % 4.84/1.41 Prover 8: Preprocessing ... % 5.50/1.45 Prover 6: Constructing countermodel ... % 5.59/1.45 Prover 6: stopped % 5.59/1.46 Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ... % 5.59/1.46 Prover 3: stopped % 5.59/1.48 Prover 10: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125 % 5.59/1.48 Prover 7: Constructing countermodel ... % 5.59/1.48 Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ... % 5.59/1.49 Prover 11: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984 % 5.59/1.51 Prover 10: Preprocessing ... % 6.03/1.54 Prover 11: Preprocessing ... % 6.35/1.60 Prover 10: Constructing countermodel ... % 6.35/1.60 Prover 7: Found proof (size 7) % 6.35/1.60 Prover 7: proved (270ms) % 6.35/1.60 Prover 1: stopped % 6.35/1.60 Prover 0: Proving ... % 6.35/1.60 Prover 10: stopped % 6.35/1.60 Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ... % 6.35/1.61 Prover 0: stopped % 6.35/1.62 Prover 11: stopped % 6.35/1.62 Prover 4: stopped % 6.35/1.63 Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 6.93/1.64 Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ... % 6.93/1.65 Prover 8: stopped % 6.93/1.65 % 6.93/1.65 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 6.93/1.65 % 6.93/1.65 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark % 6.93/1.66 Assumptions after simplification: % 6.93/1.66 --------------------------------- % 6.93/1.66 % 6.93/1.66 (just1) % 6.93/1.66 $i(c_georegion_l4_x39_y24) & $i(c_georegion_l4_x38_y24) & % 6.93/1.66 $i(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt) & ( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt) | % 6.93/1.66 borderson(c_georegion_l4_x38_y24, c_georegion_l4_x39_y24)) % 6.93/1.66 % 6.93/1.66 (query69) % 6.93/1.66 $i(c_georegion_l4_x39_y24) & $i(c_georegion_l4_x38_y24) & % 6.93/1.66 $i(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt) & mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt) & ~ % 6.93/1.66 borderson(c_georegion_l4_x38_y24, c_georegion_l4_x39_y24) % 6.93/1.66 % 6.93/1.66 Further assumptions not needed in the proof: % 6.93/1.66 -------------------------------------------- % 6.93/1.66 just10, just11, just12, just13, just14, just15, just16, just17, just18, just19, % 6.93/1.66 just2, just20, just21, just22, just23, just24, just25, just26, just27, just28, % 6.93/1.66 just29, just3, just4, just5, just6, just7, just8, just9 % 6.93/1.66 % 6.93/1.66 Those formulas are unsatisfiable: % 6.93/1.66 --------------------------------- % 6.93/1.66 % 6.93/1.66 Begin of proof % 6.93/1.66 | % 6.93/1.67 | ALPHA: (query69) implies: % 6.93/1.67 | (1) ~ borderson(c_georegion_l4_x38_y24, c_georegion_l4_x39_y24) % 6.93/1.67 | (2) mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt) % 6.93/1.67 | % 6.93/1.67 | ALPHA: (just1) implies: % 6.93/1.67 | (3) ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt) | borderson(c_georegion_l4_x38_y24, % 6.93/1.67 | c_georegion_l4_x39_y24) % 6.93/1.67 | % 6.93/1.67 | BETA: splitting (3) gives: % 6.93/1.67 | % 6.93/1.67 | Case 1: % 6.93/1.67 | | % 6.93/1.67 | | (4) ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt) % 6.93/1.67 | | % 6.93/1.67 | | PRED_UNIFY: (2), (4) imply: % 6.93/1.67 | | (5) $false % 6.93/1.67 | | % 6.93/1.67 | | CLOSE: (5) is inconsistent. % 6.93/1.67 | | % 6.93/1.67 | Case 2: % 6.93/1.67 | | % 6.93/1.67 | | (6) borderson(c_georegion_l4_x38_y24, c_georegion_l4_x39_y24) % 6.93/1.67 | | % 6.93/1.67 | | PRED_UNIFY: (1), (6) imply: % 6.93/1.67 | | (7) $false % 6.93/1.67 | | % 6.93/1.67 | | CLOSE: (7) is inconsistent. % 6.93/1.67 | | % 6.93/1.67 | End of split % 6.93/1.67 | % 6.93/1.67 End of proof % 6.93/1.67 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark % 6.93/1.67 % 6.93/1.67 1068ms %------------------------------------------------------------------------------