↑ Up

SRASS---0.1.THM-Sol.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SRASS---0.1
% Problem  : CSR069+1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : SRASS -q2 -a 0 10 10 10 -i3 -n60 %s

% Computer : art05.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 2018MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Dec 29 00:05:29 EST 2010

% Result   : Theorem 0.91s
% Output   : Solution 0.91s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ERROR: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Reading problem from /tmp/SystemOnTPTP26362/CSR069+1.tptp
% Adding relevance values
% Extracting the conjecture
% Sorting axioms by relevance
% Looking for THM       ... found
% SZS status THM for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP26362/CSR069+1.tptp
% SZS output start Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP26362/CSR069+1.tptp
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% TreeLimitedRun: /home/graph/tptp/Systems/EP---1.2/eproof --print-statistics -xAuto -tAuto --cpu-limit=60 --proof-time-unlimited --memory-limit=Auto --tstp-in --tstp-out /tmp/SRASS.s.p 
% TreeLimitedRun: CPU time limit is 60s
% TreeLimitedRun: WC  time limit is 120s
% TreeLimitedRun: PID is 26458
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% PrfWatch: 0.00 CPU 0.00 WC
% # Preprocessing time     : 0.014 s
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% fof(1, axiom,(mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt)=>borderson(c_georegion_l4_x38_y24,c_georegion_l4_x39_y24)),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', just1)).
% fof(30, conjecture,(mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt)=>borderson(c_georegion_l4_x38_y24,c_georegion_l4_x39_y24)),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', query69)).
% fof(31, negated_conjecture,~((mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt)=>borderson(c_georegion_l4_x38_y24,c_georegion_l4_x39_y24))),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[30])).
% fof(33, plain,(~(mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt))|borderson(c_georegion_l4_x38_y24,c_georegion_l4_x39_y24)),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[1])).
% cnf(34,plain,(borderson(c_georegion_l4_x38_y24,c_georegion_l4_x39_y24)|~mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[33])).
% fof(116, negated_conjecture,(mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt)&~(borderson(c_georegion_l4_x38_y24,c_georegion_l4_x39_y24))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[31])).
% cnf(117,negated_conjecture,(~borderson(c_georegion_l4_x38_y24,c_georegion_l4_x39_y24)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[116])).
% cnf(118,negated_conjecture,(mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[116])).
% cnf(119,plain,(borderson(c_georegion_l4_x38_y24,c_georegion_l4_x39_y24)|$false),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[34,118,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(120,plain,(borderson(c_georegion_l4_x38_y24,c_georegion_l4_x39_y24)),inference(cn,[status(thm)],[119,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(121,plain,($false),inference(sr,[status(thm)],[120,117,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(122,plain,($false),121,['proof']).
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% # Processed clauses                  : 5
% # ...of these trivial                : 0
% # ...subsumed                        : 0
% # ...remaining for further processing: 5
% # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% # Backward-subsumed                  : 0
% # Backward-rewritten                 : 0
% # Generated clauses                  : 0
% # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 0
% # Contextual simplify-reflections    : 0
% # Paramodulations                    : 0
% # Factorizations                     : 0
% # Equation resolutions               : 0
% # Current number of processed clauses: 4
% #    Positive orientable unit clauses: 2
% #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% #    Negative unit clauses           : 2
% #    Non-unit-clauses                : 0
% # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 26
% # ...number of literals in the above : 60
% # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound  : 0
% # Indexed BW rewrite attempts        : 0
% # Indexed BW rewrite successes       : 0
% # Backwards rewriting index:     9 leaves,   1.00+/-0.000 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-from index:            2 leaves,   1.00+/-0.000 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-into index:            8 leaves,   1.00+/-0.000 terms/leaf
% # -------------------------------------------------
% # User time              : 0.011 s
% # System time            : 0.003 s
% # Total time             : 0.014 s
% # Maximum resident set size: 0 pages
% PrfWatch: 0.10 CPU 0.17 WC
% FINAL PrfWatch: 0.10 CPU 0.17 WC
% SZS output end Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP26362/CSR069+1.tptp
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------