%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : CSR069+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:47:22 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 13.67s 3.70s
% Output : CNFRefutation 13.67s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 2
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 7 ( 5 unt; 0 nHn; 7 RR)
% Number of literals : 9 ( 0 equ; 4 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 3 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_179,plain,
( borderson(c_georegion_l4_x38_y24,c_georegion_l4_x39_y24)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-l9p9s4h2/input.p',i_0_179) ).
cnf(i_0_2660,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-l9p9s4h2/input.p',i_0_2660) ).
cnf(i_0_2659,negated_conjecture,
~ borderson(c_georegion_l4_x38_y24,c_georegion_l4_x39_y24),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-l9p9s4h2/input.p',i_0_2659) ).
cnf(c_0_2664,plain,
( borderson(c_georegion_l4_x38_y24,c_georegion_l4_x39_y24)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt) ),
i_0_179 ).
cnf(c_0_2665,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt),
i_0_2660 ).
cnf(c_0_2666,negated_conjecture,
~ borderson(c_georegion_l4_x38_y24,c_georegion_l4_x39_y24),
i_0_2659 ).
cnf(c_0_2667,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_2664,c_0_2665])]),c_0_2666]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : CSR069+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.11/0.33 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.11/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 08:36:22 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.85/1.06 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.85/1.06 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.85/1.06 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.85/1.06 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 13.67/3.70 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN:
% 13.67/3.70 # Version: 2.1pre011
% 13.67/3.70 # Preprocessing time : 0.088 s
% 13.67/3.70
% 13.67/3.70 # Proof found!
% 13.67/3.70 # SZS status Theorem
% 13.67/3.70 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 13.67/3.70 # Proof object total steps : 7
% 13.67/3.70 # Proof object clause steps : 4
% 13.67/3.70 # Proof object formula steps : 3
% 13.67/3.70 # Proof object conjectures : 4
% 13.67/3.70 # Proof object clause conjectures : 2
% 13.67/3.70 # Proof object formula conjectures : 2
% 13.67/3.70 # Proof object initial clauses used : 3
% 13.67/3.70 # Proof object initial formulas used : 3
% 13.67/3.70 # Proof object generating inferences : 0
% 13.67/3.70 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 3
% 13.67/3.70 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 13.67/3.70 # Parsed axioms : 2659
% 13.67/3.70 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 13.67/3.70 # Initial clauses : 2659
% 13.67/3.70 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 13.67/3.70 # Initial clauses in saturation : 2659
% 13.67/3.70 # Processed clauses : 13
% 13.67/3.70 # ...of these trivial : 2
% 13.67/3.70 # ...subsumed : 0
% 13.67/3.70 # ...remaining for further processing : 10
% 13.67/3.70 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 13.67/3.70 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 13.67/3.70 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 13.67/3.70 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 13.67/3.70 # Generated clauses : 0
% 13.67/3.70 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 0
% 13.67/3.70 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 13.67/3.70 # Paramodulations : 0
% 13.67/3.70 # Factorizations : 0
% 13.67/3.70 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 13.67/3.70 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 13.67/3.70 # Propositional unsat check successes : 0
% 13.67/3.70 # Current number of processed clauses : 10
% 13.67/3.70 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 6
% 13.67/3.70 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 13.67/3.70 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 13.67/3.70 # Non-unit-clauses : 2
% 13.67/3.70 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2646
% 13.67/3.70 # ...number of literals in the above : 4032
% 13.67/3.70 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 13.67/3.70 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 13.67/3.70 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 13.67/3.70 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 13.67/3.70 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 13.67/3.70 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 13.67/3.70 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 13.67/3.70 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 13.67/3.70 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 13.67/3.70 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 13.67/3.70 # Condensation successes : 0
% 13.67/3.70 # Termbank termtop insertions : 36009
% 13.67/3.70
% 13.67/3.70 # -------------------------------------------------
% 13.67/3.70 # User time : 0.081 s
% 13.67/3.70 # System time : 0.008 s
% 13.67/3.70 # Total time : 0.089 s
% 13.67/3.70 # ...preprocessing : 0.088 s
% 13.67/3.70 # ...main loop : 0.001 s
% 13.67/3.70 # Maximum resident set size: 10312 pages
% 13.67/3.70
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------