↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : CSR070+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:16:30 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.17s 0.68s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.17s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   31 (  10 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   55 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   41 (  17   ~;  14   |;   2   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   8  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    8 (   7 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   6 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   30 (   0 sgn  20   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query120,conjecture,
    ( mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt)
   => tptptypes_5_802(f_subcollectionofwithrelationfromtypefn(c_orientationvector,c_orientation,c_partiallytangible),c_tptpcol_16_8886) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query120) ).

fof(ax1_1123,axiom,
    ! [X20,X21] :
      ( ( genlmt(X20,X21)
        & mtvisible(X20) )
     => mtvisible(X21) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_1123) ).

fof(ax1_178,axiom,
    ( mtvisible(c_tptp_member2668_mt)
   => tptptypes_9_824(f_subcollectionofwithrelationfromtypefn(c_orientationvector,c_orientation,c_partiallytangible),c_tptpcol_16_8886) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_178) ).

fof(ax1_350,axiom,
    genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member2668_mt),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_350) ).

fof(ax1_427,axiom,
    ! [X5,X6] :
      ( tptptypes_9_824(X5,X6)
     => tptptypes_8_823(X5,X6) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_427) ).

fof(ax1_271,axiom,
    ! [X5,X6] :
      ( tptptypes_8_823(X5,X6)
     => tptptypes_7_819(X5,X6) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_271) ).

fof(ax1_139,axiom,
    ! [X5,X6] :
      ( tptptypes_7_819(X5,X6)
     => tptptypes_6_818(X5,X6) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_139) ).

fof(ax1_416,axiom,
    ! [X5,X6] :
      ( tptptypes_6_818(X5,X6)
     => tptptypes_5_802(X5,X6) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_416) ).

fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt)
     => tptptypes_5_802(f_subcollectionofwithrelationfromtypefn(c_orientationvector,c_orientation,c_partiallytangible),c_tptpcol_16_8886) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query120]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X1128,X1129] :
      ( mtvisible(X1129)
      | ~ genlmt(X1128,X1129)
      | ~ mtvisible(X1128) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_1123])])]) ).

fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ tptptypes_5_802(f_subcollectionofwithrelationfromtypefn(c_orientationvector,c_orientation,c_partiallytangible),c_tptpcol_16_8886)
    & mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ( tptptypes_9_824(f_subcollectionofwithrelationfromtypefn(c_orientationvector,c_orientation,c_partiallytangible),c_tptpcol_16_8886)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member2668_mt) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_178])]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( ~ genlmt(X1,X2)
    | ~ mtvisible(X1)
    | mtvisible(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member2668_mt),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax1_350]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

fof(c_0_15,plain,
    ! [X208,X209] :
      ( tptptypes_8_823(X208,X209)
      | ~ tptptypes_9_824(X208,X209) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_427])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member2668_mt)
    | tptptypes_9_824(f_subcollectionofwithrelationfromtypefn(c_orientationvector,c_orientation,c_partiallytangible),c_tptpcol_16_8886) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    mtvisible(c_tptp_member2668_mt),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14])]) ).

fof(c_0_18,plain,
    ! [X138,X139] :
      ( tptptypes_7_819(X138,X139)
      | ~ tptptypes_8_823(X138,X139) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_271])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( ~ tptptypes_9_824(X1,X2)
    | tptptypes_8_823(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    tptptypes_9_824(f_subcollectionofwithrelationfromtypefn(c_orientationvector,c_orientation,c_partiallytangible),c_tptpcol_16_8886),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17])]) ).

fof(c_0_21,plain,
    ! [X82,X83] :
      ( tptptypes_6_818(X82,X83)
      | ~ tptptypes_7_819(X82,X83) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_139])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( ~ tptptypes_8_823(X1,X2)
    | tptptypes_7_819(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    tptptypes_8_823(f_subcollectionofwithrelationfromtypefn(c_orientationvector,c_orientation,c_partiallytangible),c_tptpcol_16_8886),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).

fof(c_0_24,plain,
    ! [X202,X203] :
      ( tptptypes_5_802(X202,X203)
      | ~ tptptypes_6_818(X202,X203) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_416])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( ~ tptptypes_7_819(X1,X2)
    | tptptypes_6_818(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    tptptypes_7_819(f_subcollectionofwithrelationfromtypefn(c_orientationvector,c_orientation,c_partiallytangible),c_tptpcol_16_8886),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( ~ tptptypes_6_818(X1,X2)
    | tptptypes_5_802(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    tptptypes_6_818(f_subcollectionofwithrelationfromtypefn(c_orientationvector,c_orientation,c_partiallytangible),c_tptpcol_16_8886),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    ~ tptptypes_5_802(f_subcollectionofwithrelationfromtypefn(c_orientationvector,c_orientation,c_partiallytangible),c_tptpcol_16_8886),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]),c_0_29]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : CSR070+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.36  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:50:16 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.36  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/0.40  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.40  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.17/0.68  % Version: 3.5.1
% 1.17/0.68  % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 1.17/0.68  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.17/0.68  % Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (3) cores
% 1.17/0.68  % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 1.17/0.68  % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 1.17/0.68  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 1.17/0.68  % new_bool_3 with pid 3391705 completed with status 9
% 1.17/0.68  % new_bool_1 with pid 3391706 completed with status 9
% 1.17/0.68  % G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 3391704 completed with status 0
% 1.17/0.68  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 1.17/0.68  % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 1.17/0.68  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.17/0.68  % Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (3) cores
% 1.17/0.68  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 1.17/0.68  % No SInE strategy applied
% 1.17/0.68  % Search class: FHHNM-SSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 1.17/0.68  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 3 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
% 1.17/0.68  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 82s (1) cores
% 1.17/0.68  % Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 91s (1) cores
% 1.17/0.68  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4d with 82s (1) cores
% 1.17/0.68  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4d with pid 3391723 completed with status 0
% 1.17/0.68  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4d
% 1.17/0.68  % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 1.17/0.68  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.17/0.68  % Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (3) cores
% 1.17/0.68  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 1.17/0.68  % No SInE strategy applied
% 1.17/0.68  % Search class: FHHNM-SSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 1.17/0.68  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 3 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
% 1.17/0.68  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 82s (1) cores
% 1.17/0.68  % Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 91s (1) cores
% 1.17/0.68  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4d with 82s (1) cores
% 1.17/0.68  % Preprocessing time       : 0.019 s
% 1.17/0.68  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 1.17/0.68  
% 1.17/0.68  % Proof found!
% 1.17/0.68  % SZS status Theorem
% 1.17/0.68  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.17/0.68  % Parsed axioms                        : 1132
% 1.17/0.68  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 1.17/0.68  % Initial clauses                      : 1133
% 1.17/0.68  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 1.17/0.68  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 1133
% 1.17/0.68  % Processed clauses                    : 2667
% 1.17/0.68  % ...of these trivial                  : 39
% 1.17/0.68  % ...subsumed                          : 30
% 1.17/0.68  % ...remaining for further processing  : 2598
% 1.17/0.68  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 1.17/0.68  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 1.17/0.68  % Backward-subsumed                    : 1
% 1.17/0.68  % Backward-rewritten                   : 18
% 1.17/0.68  % Generated clauses                    : 1810
% 1.17/0.68  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1674
% 1.17/0.68  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 1.17/0.68  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 1.17/0.68  % Paramodulations                      : 1810
% 1.17/0.68  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 1.17/0.68  % NegExts                              : 0
% 1.17/0.68  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 1.17/0.68  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 1.17/0.68  % Total rewrite steps                  : 209
% 1.17/0.68  % ...of those cached                   : 123
% 1.17/0.68  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 1.17/0.68  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 1.17/0.68  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 1.17/0.68  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 1.17/0.68  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 1.17/0.68  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 1.17/0.68  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 1.17/0.68  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 1.17/0.68  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 1.17/0.68  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 1.17/0.68  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 1.17/0.68  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 1.17/0.68  % Current number of processed clauses  : 1479
% 1.17/0.68  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 475
% 1.17/0.68  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 1.17/0.68  %    Negative unit clauses             : 177
% 1.17/0.68  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 827
% 1.17/0.68  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1240
% 1.17/0.68  % ...number of literals in the above   : 1765
% 1.17/0.68  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 1.17/0.68  % Current number of archived clauses   : 1119
% 1.17/0.68  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 210675
% 1.17/0.68  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 195185
% 1.17/0.68  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 31
% 1.17/0.68  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 86870
% 1.17/0.68  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 1.17/0.68  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 16
% 1.17/0.68  % BW rewrite match successes           : 10
% 1.17/0.68  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 1.17/0.68  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 1.17/0.68  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 72938
% 1.17/0.68  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 7374
% 1.17/0.68  
% 1.17/0.68  % -------------------------------------------------
% 1.17/0.68  % User time                : 0.223 s
% 1.17/0.68  % System time              : 0.024 s
% 1.17/0.68  % Total time               : 0.247 s
% 1.17/0.68  % Maximum resident set size: 6656 pages
% 1.17/0.68  
% 1.17/0.68  % -------------------------------------------------
% 1.17/0.68  % User time                : 0.781 s
% 1.17/0.68  % System time              : 0.188 s
% 1.17/0.68  % Total time               : 0.969 s
% 1.17/0.68  % Maximum resident set size: 5632 pages
% 1.17/0.68  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------