%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR070+4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:18:32 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.94s 1.68s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.94s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 31 ( 8 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 57 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 47 ( 21 ~; 16 |; 2 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 8 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 8 ( 7 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 6 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 34 ( 0 sgn 20 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query220,conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt)
=> tptptypes_5_802(f_subcollectionofwithrelationfromtypefn(c_orientationvector,c_orientation,c_partiallytangible),c_tptpcol_16_8886) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query220) ).
fof(ax3_13383,axiom,
! [X2,X3] :
( tptptypes_8_823(X2,X3)
=> tptptypes_7_819(X2,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_13383) ).
fof(ax3_21996,axiom,
! [X2,X3] :
( tptptypes_9_824(X2,X3)
=> tptptypes_8_823(X2,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_21996) ).
fof(ax3_6690,axiom,
! [X2,X3] :
( tptptypes_6_818(X2,X3)
=> tptptypes_5_802(X2,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_6690) ).
fof(ax3_5897,axiom,
! [X2,X3] :
( tptptypes_7_819(X2,X3)
=> tptptypes_6_818(X2,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_5897) ).
fof(ax3_44208,axiom,
! [X22,X23] :
( ( genlmt(X22,X23)
& mtvisible(X22) )
=> mtvisible(X23) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_44208) ).
fof(ax3_21032,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_tptp_member2668_mt)
=> tptptypes_9_824(f_subcollectionofwithrelationfromtypefn(c_orientationvector,c_orientation,c_partiallytangible),c_tptpcol_16_8886) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_21032) ).
fof(ax3_8455,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member2668_mt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_8455) ).
fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ ( mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt)
=> tptptypes_5_802(f_subcollectionofwithrelationfromtypefn(c_orientationvector,c_orientation,c_partiallytangible),c_tptpcol_16_8886) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query220]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X203,X204] :
( tptptypes_7_819(X203,X204)
| ~ tptptypes_8_823(X203,X204) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_13383])])]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X71,X72] :
( tptptypes_8_823(X71,X72)
| ~ tptptypes_9_824(X71,X72) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_21996])])]) ).
fof(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
( ~ tptptypes_5_802(f_subcollectionofwithrelationfromtypefn(c_orientationvector,c_orientation,c_partiallytangible),c_tptpcol_16_8886)
& mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])]) ).
fof(c_0_12,plain,
! [X24,X25] :
( tptptypes_5_802(X24,X25)
| ~ tptptypes_6_818(X24,X25) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_6690])])]) ).
fof(c_0_13,plain,
! [X51,X52] :
( tptptypes_6_818(X51,X52)
| ~ tptptypes_7_819(X51,X52) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_5897])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( ~ tptptypes_8_823(X1,X2)
| tptptypes_7_819(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ~ tptptypes_9_824(X1,X2)
| tptptypes_8_823(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
fof(c_0_16,plain,
! [X49,X50] :
( mtvisible(X50)
| ~ genlmt(X49,X50)
| ~ mtvisible(X49) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_44208])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
~ tptptypes_5_802(f_subcollectionofwithrelationfromtypefn(c_orientationvector,c_orientation,c_partiallytangible),c_tptpcol_16_8886),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( ~ tptptypes_6_818(X1,X2)
| tptptypes_5_802(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( ~ tptptypes_7_819(X1,X2)
| tptptypes_6_818(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( ~ tptptypes_9_824(X1,X2)
| tptptypes_7_819(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).
fof(c_0_21,plain,
( tptptypes_9_824(f_subcollectionofwithrelationfromtypefn(c_orientationvector,c_orientation,c_partiallytangible),c_tptpcol_16_8886)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member2668_mt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_21032])]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( ~ genlmt(X1,X2)
| ~ mtvisible(X1)
| mtvisible(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member2668_mt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax3_8455]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
~ tptptypes_6_818(f_subcollectionofwithrelationfromtypefn(c_orientationvector,c_orientation,c_partiallytangible),c_tptpcol_16_8886),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( ~ tptptypes_9_824(X1,X2)
| tptptypes_6_818(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member2668_mt)
| tptptypes_9_824(f_subcollectionofwithrelationfromtypefn(c_orientationvector,c_orientation,c_partiallytangible),c_tptpcol_16_8886) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
mtvisible(c_tptp_member2668_mt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]),c_0_24])]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
~ tptptypes_9_824(f_subcollectionofwithrelationfromtypefn(c_orientationvector,c_orientation,c_partiallytangible),c_tptpcol_16_8886),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28])]),c_0_29]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : CSR070+4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.37 % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:50:29 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.94/1.68 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.94/1.68 % Preprocessing class: FMLLLMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.94/1.68 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.94/1.68 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.94/1.68 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.94/1.68 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.94/1.68 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.94/1.68 % sh5l with pid 3392129 completed with status 0
% 0.94/1.68 % Result found by sh5l
% 0.94/1.68 % Preprocessing class: FMLLLMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.94/1.68 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.94/1.68 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.94/1.68 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.94/1.68 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.94/1.68 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.94/1.68 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.94/1.68 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.94/1.68 % Search class: FHHSM-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.94/1.68 % partial match(1): FGHSM-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.94/1.68 % Scheduled 8 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.94/1.68 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.94/1.68 % SubtermCWHack with pid 3392134 completed with status 0
% 0.94/1.68 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.94/1.68 % Preprocessing class: FMLLLMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.94/1.68 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.94/1.68 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.94/1.68 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.94/1.68 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.94/1.68 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.94/1.68 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.94/1.68 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.94/1.68 % Search class: FHHSM-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.94/1.68 % partial match(1): FGHSM-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.94/1.68 % Scheduled 8 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.94/1.68 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.94/1.68 % Preprocessing time : 0.027 s
% 0.94/1.68
% 0.94/1.68 % Proof found!
% 0.94/1.68 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.94/1.68 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.94/1.68 % Parsed axioms : 44217
% 0.94/1.68 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 43661
% 0.94/1.68 % Initial clauses : 557
% 0.94/1.68 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 1
% 0.94/1.68 % Initial clauses in saturation : 556
% 0.94/1.68 % Processed clauses : 1309
% 0.94/1.68 % ...of these trivial : 199
% 0.94/1.68 % ...subsumed : 155
% 0.94/1.68 % ...remaining for further processing : 954
% 0.94/1.68 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 0.94/1.68 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.94/1.68 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.94/1.68 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.94/1.68 % Generated clauses : 2084
% 0.94/1.68 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1140
% 0.94/1.68 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.94/1.68 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.94/1.68 % Paramodulations : 2083
% 0.94/1.68 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.94/1.68 % NegExts : 0
% 0.94/1.68 % Equation resolutions : 1
% 0.94/1.68 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.94/1.68 % Total rewrite steps : 1015
% 0.94/1.68 % ...of those cached : 757
% 0.94/1.68 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.94/1.68 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.94/1.68 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.94/1.68 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.94/1.68 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.94/1.68 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.94/1.68 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.94/1.68 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.94/1.68 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.94/1.68 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.94/1.68 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.94/1.68 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.94/1.68 % Current number of processed clauses : 953
% 0.94/1.68 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 488
% 0.94/1.68 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.94/1.68 % Negative unit clauses : 45
% 0.94/1.68 % Non-unit-clauses : 420
% 0.94/1.68 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 387
% 0.94/1.68 % ...number of literals in the above : 753
% 0.94/1.68 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.94/1.68 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.94/1.68 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 26683
% 0.94/1.68 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 25690
% 0.94/1.68 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 134
% 0.94/1.68 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2604
% 0.94/1.68 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.94/1.68 % BW rewrite match attempts : 13
% 0.94/1.68 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.94/1.68 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.94/1.68 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.94/1.68 % Termbank termtop insertions : 327635
% 0.94/1.68 % Search garbage collected termcells : 157599
% 0.94/1.68
% 0.94/1.68 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.94/1.68 % User time : 0.274 s
% 0.94/1.68 % System time : 0.164 s
% 0.94/1.68 % Total time : 0.439 s
% 0.94/1.68 % Maximum resident set size: 84708 pages
% 0.94/1.68
% 0.94/1.68 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.94/1.68 % User time : 1.001 s
% 0.94/1.68 % System time : 0.237 s
% 0.94/1.68 % Total time : 1.238 s
% 0.94/1.68 % Maximum resident set size: 38144 pages
% 0.94/1.68 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------