↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : CSR070+5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v3.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:16:30 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 36.00s 31.86s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 36.00s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   31 (   7 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   58 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   47 (  20   ~;  17   |;   2   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   8  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    8 (   7 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   6 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   36 (   0 sgn  20   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(ax4_66602,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3] :
      ( tptptypes_8_823(X2,X3)
     => tptptypes_7_819(X2,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+4.ax',ax4_66602) ).

fof(ax4_170778,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3] :
      ( tptptypes_9_824(X2,X3)
     => tptptypes_8_823(X2,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+4.ax',ax4_170778) ).

fof(query270,conjecture,
    ( mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt)
   => tptptypes_5_802(f_subcollectionofwithrelationfromtypefn(c_orientationvector,c_orientation,c_partiallytangible),c_tptpcol_16_8886) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query270) ).

fof(ax4_198111,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3] :
      ( tptptypes_7_819(X2,X3)
     => tptptypes_6_818(X2,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+4.ax',ax4_198111) ).

fof(ax4_540220,axiom,
    ! [X28,X29] :
      ( ( genlmt(X28,X29)
        & mtvisible(X28) )
     => mtvisible(X29) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+4.ax',ax4_540220) ).

fof(ax4_10501,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3] :
      ( tptptypes_6_818(X2,X3)
     => tptptypes_5_802(X2,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+4.ax',ax4_10501) ).

fof(ax4_87455,axiom,
    ( mtvisible(c_tptp_member2668_mt)
   => tptptypes_9_824(f_subcollectionofwithrelationfromtypefn(c_orientationvector,c_orientation,c_partiallytangible),c_tptpcol_16_8886) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+4.ax',ax4_87455) ).

fof(ax4_235953,axiom,
    genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member2668_mt),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+4.ax',ax4_235953) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X305,X306] :
      ( tptptypes_7_819(X305,X306)
      | ~ tptptypes_8_823(X305,X306) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax4_66602])])]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X105,X106] :
      ( tptptypes_8_823(X105,X106)
      | ~ tptptypes_9_824(X105,X106) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax4_170778])])]) ).

fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt)
     => tptptypes_5_802(f_subcollectionofwithrelationfromtypefn(c_orientationvector,c_orientation,c_partiallytangible),c_tptpcol_16_8886) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query270]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X70,X71] :
      ( tptptypes_6_818(X70,X71)
      | ~ tptptypes_7_819(X70,X71) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax4_198111])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( ~ tptptypes_8_823(X1,X2)
    | tptptypes_7_819(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( ~ tptptypes_9_824(X1,X2)
    | tptptypes_8_823(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

fof(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X294,X295] :
      ( mtvisible(X295)
      | ~ genlmt(X294,X295)
      | ~ mtvisible(X294) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax4_540220])])]) ).

fof(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ tptptypes_5_802(f_subcollectionofwithrelationfromtypefn(c_orientationvector,c_orientation,c_partiallytangible),c_tptpcol_16_8886)
    & mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])]) ).

fof(c_0_16,plain,
    ! [X32,X33] :
      ( tptptypes_5_802(X32,X33)
      | ~ tptptypes_6_818(X32,X33) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax4_10501])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( ~ tptptypes_7_819(X1,X2)
    | tptptypes_6_818(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( ~ tptptypes_9_824(X1,X2)
    | tptptypes_7_819(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

fof(c_0_19,plain,
    ( tptptypes_9_824(f_subcollectionofwithrelationfromtypefn(c_orientationvector,c_orientation,c_partiallytangible),c_tptpcol_16_8886)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member2668_mt) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax4_87455])]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( ~ genlmt(X1,X2)
    | ~ mtvisible(X1)
    | mtvisible(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member2668_mt),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax4_235953]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( ~ tptptypes_6_818(X1,X2)
    | tptptypes_5_802(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( ~ tptptypes_9_824(X1,X2)
    | tptptypes_6_818(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member2668_mt)
    | tptptypes_9_824(f_subcollectionofwithrelationfromtypefn(c_orientationvector,c_orientation,c_partiallytangible),c_tptpcol_16_8886) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    mtvisible(c_tptp_member2668_mt),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_22])]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ~ tptptypes_5_802(f_subcollectionofwithrelationfromtypefn(c_orientationvector,c_orientation,c_partiallytangible),c_tptpcol_16_8886),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( ~ tptptypes_9_824(X1,X2)
    | tptptypes_5_802(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    tptptypes_9_824(f_subcollectionofwithrelationfromtypefn(c_orientationvector,c_orientation,c_partiallytangible),c_tptpcol_16_8886),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26])]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]),c_0_29])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04  % Problem  : CSR070+5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v3.5.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.19/10.49  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.19/10.49  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.19/10.49  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.19/10.49  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.19/10.49  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.19/10.49  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.19/10.49  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.19/10.49  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:46:06 UTC 2026
% 0.19/10.49  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/10.49  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.25/10.56  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.25/10.56  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 36.00/31.86  % Version: 3.5.1
% 36.00/31.86  % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 36.00/31.86  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 285 seconds (2280 total)
% 36.00/31.86  % Starting new_ho_10 with 570s (2) cores
% 36.00/31.86  % Starting sh3 with 570s (2) cores
% 36.00/31.86  % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 570s (2) cores
% 36.00/31.86  % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 570s (2) cores
% 36.00/31.86  % sh3 with pid 1236752 completed with status 0
% 36.00/31.86  % Result found by sh3
% 36.00/31.86  % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 36.00/31.86  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 285 seconds (2280 total)
% 36.00/31.86  % Starting new_ho_10 with 570s (2) cores
% 36.00/31.86  % Starting sh3 with 570s (2) cores
% 36.00/31.86  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 36.00/31.86  % SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 36.00/31.86  % Search class: FHHSM-SSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 36.00/31.86  % partial match(1): FHHNM-SSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 36.00/31.86  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 2 cores with 566 seconds (566 total)
% 36.00/31.86  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 51s (1) cores
% 36.00/31.86  % Starting sh3 with 57s (1) cores
% 36.00/31.86  % SubtermCWHack with pid 1237072 completed with status 0
% 36.00/31.86  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 36.00/31.86  % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 36.00/31.86  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 285 seconds (2280 total)
% 36.00/31.86  % Starting new_ho_10 with 570s (2) cores
% 36.00/31.86  % Starting sh3 with 570s (2) cores
% 36.00/31.86  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 36.00/31.86  % SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 36.00/31.86  % Search class: FHHSM-SSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 36.00/31.86  % partial match(1): FHHNM-SSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 36.00/31.86  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 2 cores with 566 seconds (566 total)
% 36.00/31.86  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 51s (1) cores
% 36.00/31.86  % Preprocessing time       : 0.247 s
% 36.00/31.86  
% 36.00/31.86  % Proof found!
% 36.00/31.86  % SZS status Theorem
% 36.00/31.86  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 36.00/31.86  % Parsed axioms                        : 540250
% 36.00/31.86  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 538556
% 36.00/31.86  % Initial clauses                      : 1695
% 36.00/31.86  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 2
% 36.00/31.86  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 1693
% 36.00/31.86  % Processed clauses                    : 5270
% 36.00/31.86  % ...of these trivial                  : 293
% 36.00/31.86  % ...subsumed                          : 1010
% 36.00/31.86  % ...remaining for further processing  : 3966
% 36.00/31.86  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 1
% 36.00/31.86  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 36.00/31.86  % Backward-subsumed                    : 21
% 36.00/31.86  % Backward-rewritten                   : 79
% 36.00/31.86  % Generated clauses                    : 17761
% 36.00/31.86  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 13888
% 36.00/31.86  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 36.00/31.86  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 36.00/31.86  % Paramodulations                      : 17760
% 36.00/31.86  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 36.00/31.86  % NegExts                              : 0
% 36.00/31.86  % Equation resolutions                 : 1
% 36.00/31.86  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 36.00/31.86  % Total rewrite steps                  : 2840
% 36.00/31.86  % ...of those cached                   : 2127
% 36.00/31.86  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 36.00/31.86  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 36.00/31.86  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 36.00/31.86  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 36.00/31.86  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 36.00/31.86  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 36.00/31.86  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 36.00/31.86  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 36.00/31.86  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 36.00/31.86  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 36.00/31.86  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 36.00/31.86  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 36.00/31.86  % Current number of processed clauses  : 3865
% 36.00/31.86  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 1834
% 36.00/31.86  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 36.00/31.86  %    Negative unit clauses             : 602
% 36.00/31.86  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 1429
% 36.00/31.86  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 10278
% 36.00/31.86  % ...number of literals in the above   : 20710
% 36.00/31.86  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 36.00/31.86  % Current number of archived clauses   : 100
% 36.00/31.86  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 252665
% 36.00/31.86  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 206893
% 36.00/31.86  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 334
% 36.00/31.86  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 347682
% 36.00/31.86  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 36.00/31.86  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 268
% 36.00/31.86  % BW rewrite match successes           : 80
% 36.00/31.86  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 36.00/31.86  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 36.00/31.86  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 3870559
% 36.00/31.86  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 2172625
% 36.00/31.86  
% 36.00/31.86  % -------------------------------------------------
% 36.00/31.86  % User time                : 3.775 s
% 36.00/31.86  % System time              : 1.740 s
% 36.00/31.86  % Total time               : 5.516 s
% 36.00/31.86  % Maximum resident set size: 1242144 pages
% 36.00/31.86  
% 36.00/31.86  % -------------------------------------------------
% 36.00/31.86  % User time                : 18.868 s
% 36.00/31.86  % System time              : 3.021 s
% 36.00/31.86  % Total time               : 21.889 s
% 36.00/31.86  % Maximum resident set size: 456960 pages
% 36.00/31.86  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------