%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : CSR071+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 23:21:52 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 1.60s 1.78s
% Output : Refutation 1.60s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : CSR071+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.11/0.12 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Fri Jun 10 19:56:35 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.35 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.18/0.35 The process was started by sandbox on n020.cluster.edu,
% 0.18/0.35 Fri Jun 10 19:56:35 2022
% 0.18/0.35 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 15463.
% 0.18/0.35
% 0.18/0.35 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.18/0.35 set(auto).
% 0.18/0.35 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.18/0.35 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.18/0.35 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.18/0.35 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.18/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.18/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.18/0.35 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.18/0.35 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.18/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.18/0.35 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.18/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.18/0.35 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.18/0.35 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.18/0.35 clear(print_given).
% 0.18/0.35
% 0.18/0.35 formula_list(usable).
% 0.18/0.35
% 0.18/0.35 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 0.18/0.35
% 0.18/0.35 This is a Horn set without equality. The strategy will
% 0.18/0.35 be hyperresolution, with satellites in sos and nuclei
% 0.18/0.35 in usable.
% 0.18/0.35
% 0.18/0.35 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.18/0.35 dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 0.18/0.35
% 0.18/0.35 ------------> process usable:
% 0.18/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 7 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -genlpreds(A,B)|predicate(B).
% 0.18/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 8 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -genlpreds(A,B)|predicate(A).
% 0.18/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 10 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -predicate(A)|genlpreds(A,A).
% 0.18/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 27 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -isa(A,B)|collection(B).
% 0.18/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 28 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -isa(A,B)|thing(A).
% 0.18/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 31 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -genlmt(A,B)|microtheory(B).
% 0.18/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 32 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -genlmt(A,B)|microtheory(A).
% 0.18/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 34 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -microtheory(A)|genlmt(A,A).
% 0.18/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 39 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -genls(A,B)|collection(B).
% 0.18/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 40 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -genls(A,B)|collection(A).
% 0.18/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 42 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -collection(A)|genls(A,A).
% 0.18/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 41 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -genls(A,B)| -genls(C,A)|genls(C,B).
% 0.18/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 41 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -genls(A,B)| -genls(B,C)|genls(A,C).
% 0.18/0.35
% 0.18/0.35 ------------> process sos:
% 0.18/0.35
% 0.18/0.35 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.18/0.38
% 0.18/0.38 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.18/0.38
% 0.18/0.38 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.18/0.38
% 0.18/0.38
% 0.18/0.38 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.18/0.38
% 0.18/0.38 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.18/0.38 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.18/0.38 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.18/0.38 number of clauses in intial UL: 43
% 0.18/0.38 number of clauses initially in problem: 60
% 0.18/0.38 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 71
% 0.18/0.38 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 68
% 0.18/0.38 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.18/0.38 absolute distinct symbol count: 41
% 0.18/0.38 distinct predicate count: 21
% 0.18/0.38 distinct function count: 1
% 0.18/0.38 distinct constant count: 19
% 0.18/0.38
% 0.18/0.38 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.18/0.38
% 0.18/0.38
% 0.18/0.38
% 0.18/0.38 =========== start of search ===========
% 1.60/1.78
% 1.60/1.78 -------- PROOF --------
% 1.60/1.78 % SZS status Theorem
% 1.60/1.78 % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.60/1.78
% 1.60/1.78 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.60/1.78
% 1.60/1.78 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.60/1.78
% 1.60/1.78 Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.60/1.78
% 1.60/1.78 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.60/1.78
% 1.60/1.78 Model 4 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.60/1.78
% 1.60/1.78 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.60/1.78
% 1.60/1.78 Model 5 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.60/1.78
% 1.60/1.78 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.60/1.78
% 1.60/1.78 Model 6 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.60/1.78
% 1.60/1.78 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.60/1.78
% 1.60/1.78 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.60/1.78
% 1.60/1.78 Model 7 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.60/1.78
% 1.60/1.78 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.60/1.78
% 1.60/1.78 Model 8 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.60/1.78
% 1.60/1.78 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.60/1.78
% 1.60/1.78 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.60/1.78
% 1.60/1.78 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.60/1.78
% 1.60/1.78 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.60/1.78
% 1.60/1.78 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.60/1.78
% 1.60/1.78 Model 9 [ 1 1 293 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.60/1.78
% 1.60/1.78 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.60/1.78
% 1.60/1.78 Model 10 [ 1 0 511 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.60/1.78
% 1.60/1.78 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.60/1.78
% 1.60/1.78 Model 11 [ 1 1 487 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.60/1.78
% 1.60/1.78 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.60/1.78
% 1.60/1.78 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.60/1.78
% 1.60/1.78 Model 12 [ 1 0 1054 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.60/1.78
% 1.60/1.78 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.60/1.78
% 1.60/1.78 Model 13 [ 1 1 803 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.60/1.78
% 1.60/1.78 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.60/1.78
% 1.60/1.78 Model 14 [ 10 5 231961 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.60/1.78
% 1.60/1.78 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.60/1.78
% 1.60/1.78 Model 15 [ 4 0 214 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.60/1.78
% 1.60/1.78 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.60/1.78
% 1.60/1.78 Model 16 [ 13 1 429 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.60/1.78
% 1.60/1.78 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.60/1.78
% 1.60/1.78 Model 17 [ 1 0 904 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.60/1.78
% 1.60/1.78 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.60/1.78
% 1.60/1.78 Model 18 [ 5 0 2418 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.60/1.78
% 1.60/1.78 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.60/1.78
% 1.60/1.78 Model 19 [ 7 0 308 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.60/1.78
% 1.60/1.78 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.60/1.78
% 1.60/1.78 Model 20 [ 1 0 368 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.60/1.78
% 1.60/1.78 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 1.40 sec ----> 102 [binary,101.1,43.1] {-} $F.
% 1.60/1.78
% 1.60/1.78 Length of proof is 5. Level of proof is 4.
% 1.60/1.78
% 1.60/1.78 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.60/1.78 % SZS status Theorem
% 1.60/1.78 % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.60/1.78
% 1.60/1.78 1 [] {+} -navypersonnel(A)|militaryperson(A).
% 1.60/1.78 2 [] {+} -mtvisible(c_tptp_member698_mt)| -militaryperson(A)|tptpofobject(A,f_tptpquantityfn_6(n_414)).
% 1.60/1.78 4 [] {+} -mtvisible(c_tptp_member1672_mt)|navypersonnel(c_tptpnavypersonnel_3).
% 1.60/1.78 30 [] {+} -mtvisible(A)| -genlmt(A,B)|mtvisible(B).
% 1.60/1.78 43 [] {+} -tptpofobject(c_tptpnavypersonnel_3,f_tptpquantityfn_6(n_414)).
% 1.60/1.78 51 [] {-} genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member698_mt).
% 1.60/1.78 52 [] {+} genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member1672_mt).
% 1.60/1.78 60 [] {+} mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt).
% 1.60/1.78 74 [hyper,51,30,60] {-} mtvisible(c_tptp_member698_mt).
% 1.60/1.78 83 [hyper,52,30,60] {-} mtvisible(c_tptp_member1672_mt).
% 1.60/1.78 84 [hyper,83,4] {+} navypersonnel(c_tptpnavypersonnel_3).
% 1.60/1.78 88 [hyper,84,1] {+} militaryperson(c_tptpnavypersonnel_3).
% 1.60/1.78 101 [hyper,88,2,74] {-} tptpofobject(c_tptpnavypersonnel_3,f_tptpquantityfn_6(n_414)).
% 1.60/1.78 102 [binary,101.1,43.1] {-} $F.
% 1.60/1.78
% 1.60/1.78 % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.60/1.78 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.60/1.78
% 1.60/1.78
% 1.60/1.78 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.60/1.78
% 1.60/1.78
% 1.60/1.78 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.60/1.78
% 1.60/1.78 ============ end of search ============
% 1.60/1.78
% 1.60/1.78 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 1.60/1.78
% 1.60/1.78 true clauses given 8 (24.2%)
% 1.60/1.78 false clauses given 25
% 1.60/1.78
% 1.60/1.78 FALSE TRUE
% 1.60/1.78 2 0 9
% 1.60/1.78 3 0 14
% 1.60/1.78 tot: 0 23 (100.0% true)
% 1.60/1.78
% 1.60/1.78
% 1.60/1.78 Model 20 [ 1 0 368 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.60/1.78
% 1.60/1.78 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.60/1.78
% 1.60/1.78 Process 15463 finished Fri Jun 10 19:56:37 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------