↑ Up

SPASS---3.9.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : CSR071+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 23:25:01 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s 0.44s
% Output   : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12  % Problem  : CSR071+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.04/0.13  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Fri Jun 10 19:17:35 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.44  
% 0.20/0.44  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.20/0.44  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.20/0.44  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.20/0.44  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.20/0.44  SPASS derived 28 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 80 clauses.
% 0.20/0.44  SPASS allocated 97743 KBytes.
% 0.20/0.44  SPASS spent	0:00:00.09 on the problem.
% 0.20/0.44  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.20/0.44  		0:00:00.03 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.20/0.44  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.20/0.44  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.20/0.44  		0:00:00.00 for the reduction.
% 0.20/0.44  
% 0.20/0.44  
% 0.20/0.44  Here is a proof with depth 5, length 16 :
% 0.20/0.44  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.20/0.44  1[0:Inp] ||  -> mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt)*.
% 0.20/0.44  11[0:Inp] ||  -> genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member698_mt)*l.
% 0.20/0.44  12[0:Inp] ||  -> genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member1672_mt)*l.
% 0.20/0.44  17[0:Inp] || tptpofobject(c_tptpnavypersonnel_3,f_tptpquantityfn_6(n_414))* -> .
% 0.20/0.44  18[0:Inp] navypersonnel(u) ||  -> militaryperson(u)*.
% 0.20/0.44  19[0:Inp] || mtvisible(c_tptp_member1672_mt) -> navypersonnel(c_tptpnavypersonnel_3)*.
% 0.20/0.44  60[0:Inp] mtvisible(u) || genlmt(u,v)* -> mtvisible(v)*.
% 0.20/0.44  61[0:Inp] militaryperson(u) || mtvisible(c_tptp_member698_mt) -> tptpofobject(u,f_tptpquantityfn_6(n_414))*.
% 0.20/0.44  74[0:Res:1.0,60.0] || genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,u) -> mtvisible(u)*.
% 0.20/0.44  75[0:Res:61.2,17.0] militaryperson(c_tptpnavypersonnel_3) || mtvisible(c_tptp_member698_mt)* -> .
% 0.20/0.44  105[0:SoR:75.0,18.1] navypersonnel(c_tptpnavypersonnel_3) || mtvisible(c_tptp_member698_mt)* -> .
% 0.20/0.44  106[0:SoR:105.0,19.1] || mtvisible(c_tptp_member698_mt)* mtvisible(c_tptp_member1672_mt) -> .
% 0.20/0.44  129[0:Res:74.1,106.0] || genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member698_mt) mtvisible(c_tptp_member1672_mt)* -> .
% 0.20/0.44  130[0:MRR:129.0,11.0] || mtvisible(c_tptp_member1672_mt)* -> .
% 0.20/0.44  131[0:Res:74.1,130.0] || genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member1672_mt)*l -> .
% 0.20/0.44  132[0:MRR:131.0,12.0] ||  -> .
% 0.20/0.44  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.20/0.44  Formulae used in the proof : query71 just9 just10 just2 just15 just50 just13
% 0.20/0.44  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------