%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR071+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:16:30 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.30s 0.47s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.30s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 27 ( 9 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 51 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 44 ( 20 ~; 15 |; 3 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 6 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 5 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 12 ( 0 sgn 8 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query121,conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt)
=> tptpofobject(c_tptpnavypersonnel_3,f_tptpquantityfn_6(n_414)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query121) ).
fof(ax1_495,axiom,
! [X10] :
( ( militaryperson(X10)
& mtvisible(c_tptp_member698_mt) )
=> tptpofobject(X10,f_tptpquantityfn_6(n_414)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_495) ).
fof(ax1_284,axiom,
! [X1] :
( navypersonnel(X1)
=> militaryperson(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_284) ).
fof(ax1_91,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_tptp_member1672_mt)
=> navypersonnel(c_tptpnavypersonnel_3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_91) ).
fof(ax1_1123,axiom,
! [X20,X21] :
( ( genlmt(X20,X21)
& mtvisible(X20) )
=> mtvisible(X21) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_1123) ).
fof(ax1_448,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member698_mt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_448) ).
fof(ax1_453,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member1672_mt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_453) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ ( mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt)
=> tptpofobject(c_tptpnavypersonnel_3,f_tptpquantityfn_6(n_414)) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query121]) ).
fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( ~ tptpofobject(c_tptpnavypersonnel_3,f_tptpquantityfn_6(n_414))
& mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X28] :
( tptpofobject(X28,f_tptpquantityfn_6(n_414))
| ~ militaryperson(X28)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member698_mt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_495])])]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X45] :
( militaryperson(X45)
| ~ navypersonnel(X45) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_284])])]) ).
fof(c_0_11,plain,
( navypersonnel(c_tptpnavypersonnel_3)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member1672_mt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_91])]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
~ tptpofobject(c_tptpnavypersonnel_3,f_tptpquantityfn_6(n_414)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( ~ militaryperson(X1)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member698_mt)
| tptpofobject(X1,f_tptpquantityfn_6(n_414)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( ~ navypersonnel(X1)
| militaryperson(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member1672_mt)
| navypersonnel(c_tptpnavypersonnel_3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
fof(c_0_16,plain,
! [X29,X30] :
( mtvisible(X30)
| ~ genlmt(X29,X30)
| ~ mtvisible(X29) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_1123])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member698_mt)
| ~ militaryperson(c_tptpnavypersonnel_3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member1672_mt)
| militaryperson(c_tptpnavypersonnel_3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( ~ genlmt(X1,X2)
| ~ mtvisible(X1)
| mtvisible(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member698_mt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax1_448]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member1672_mt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax1_453]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member1672_mt)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member698_mt) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
mtvisible(c_tptp_member698_mt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_21])]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
mtvisible(c_tptp_member1672_mt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_22]),c_0_21])]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24])]),c_0_25])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : CSR071+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/0.37 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.13/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.13/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:48:07 UTC 2026
% 0.13/0.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.38 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/0.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.30/0.47 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.30/0.47 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.30/0.47 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.30/0.47 % Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (3) cores
% 0.30/0.47 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.30/0.47 % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.30/0.47 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.30/0.47 % new_bool_3 with pid 2537630 completed with status 0
% 0.30/0.47 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.30/0.47 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.30/0.47 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.30/0.47 % Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (3) cores
% 0.30/0.47 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.30/0.47 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.30/0.47 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.30/0.47 % Search class: FHUNM-FFMS31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.30/0.47 % partial match(1): FHUNM-FFMS31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.30/0.47 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.30/0.47 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 61s (1) cores
% 0.30/0.47 % Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 361s (1) cores
% 0.30/0.47 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2537633 completed with status 0
% 0.30/0.47 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.30/0.47 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.30/0.47 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.30/0.47 % Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (3) cores
% 0.30/0.47 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.30/0.47 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.30/0.47 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.30/0.47 % Search class: FHUNM-FFMS31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.30/0.47 % partial match(1): FHUNM-FFMS31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.30/0.47 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.30/0.47 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 61s (1) cores
% 0.30/0.47 % Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 0.30/0.47
% 0.30/0.47 % Proof found!
% 0.30/0.47 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.30/0.47 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.30/0.47 % Parsed axioms : 1132
% 0.30/0.47 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 1072
% 0.30/0.47 % Initial clauses : 61
% 0.30/0.47 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.30/0.47 % Initial clauses in saturation : 61
% 0.30/0.47 % Processed clauses : 58
% 0.30/0.47 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.30/0.47 % ...subsumed : 6
% 0.30/0.47 % ...remaining for further processing : 51
% 0.30/0.47 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.30/0.47 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.30/0.47 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.30/0.47 % Backward-rewritten : 5
% 0.30/0.47 % Generated clauses : 25
% 0.30/0.47 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 20
% 0.30/0.47 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.30/0.47 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.30/0.47 % Paramodulations : 25
% 0.30/0.47 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.30/0.47 % NegExts : 0
% 0.30/0.47 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.30/0.47 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.30/0.47 % Total rewrite steps : 13
% 0.30/0.47 % ...of those cached : 7
% 0.30/0.47 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.30/0.47 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.30/0.47 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.30/0.47 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.30/0.47 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.30/0.47 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.30/0.47 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.30/0.47 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.30/0.47 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.30/0.47 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.30/0.47 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.30/0.47 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.30/0.47 % Current number of processed clauses : 46
% 0.30/0.47 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 24
% 0.30/0.47 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.30/0.47 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.30/0.47 % Non-unit-clauses : 21
% 0.30/0.47 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 23
% 0.30/0.47 % ...number of literals in the above : 44
% 0.30/0.47 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.30/0.47 % Current number of archived clauses : 5
% 0.30/0.47 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 86
% 0.30/0.47 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 82
% 0.30/0.47 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 6
% 0.30/0.47 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 8
% 0.30/0.47 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.30/0.47 % BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 0.30/0.47 % BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.30/0.47 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.30/0.47 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.30/0.47 % Termbank termtop insertions : 10175
% 0.30/0.47 % Search garbage collected termcells : 4937
% 0.30/0.47
% 0.30/0.47 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.30/0.47 % User time : 0.009 s
% 0.30/0.47 % System time : 0.011 s
% 0.30/0.47 % Total time : 0.019 s
% 0.30/0.47 % Maximum resident set size: 6144 pages
% 0.30/0.47
% 0.30/0.47 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.30/0.47 % User time : 0.033 s
% 0.30/0.47 % System time : 0.019 s
% 0.30/0.47 % Total time : 0.051 s
% 0.30/0.47 % Maximum resident set size: 5888 pages
% 0.30/0.47 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------