%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR071+4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:16:31 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 1.52s 1.41s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.52s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 27 ( 9 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 51 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 44 ( 20 ~; 15 |; 3 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 6 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 5 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 12 ( 0 sgn 8 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query221,conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt)
=> tptpofobject(c_tptpnavypersonnel_3,f_tptpquantityfn_6(n_414)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query221) ).
fof(ax3_13721,axiom,
! [X6] :
( ( militaryperson(X6)
& mtvisible(c_tptp_member698_mt) )
=> tptpofobject(X6,f_tptpquantityfn_6(n_414)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_13721) ).
fof(ax3_14292,axiom,
! [X1] :
( navypersonnel(X1)
=> militaryperson(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_14292) ).
fof(ax3_790,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_tptp_member1672_mt)
=> navypersonnel(c_tptpnavypersonnel_3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_790) ).
fof(ax3_44208,axiom,
! [X22,X23] :
( ( genlmt(X22,X23)
& mtvisible(X22) )
=> mtvisible(X23) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_44208) ).
fof(ax3_1540,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member698_mt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_1540) ).
fof(ax3_303,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member1672_mt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_303) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ ( mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt)
=> tptpofobject(c_tptpnavypersonnel_3,f_tptpquantityfn_6(n_414)) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query221]) ).
fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( ~ tptpofobject(c_tptpnavypersonnel_3,f_tptpquantityfn_6(n_414))
& mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X28] :
( tptpofobject(X28,f_tptpquantityfn_6(n_414))
| ~ militaryperson(X28)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member698_mt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_13721])])]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X69] :
( militaryperson(X69)
| ~ navypersonnel(X69) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_14292])])]) ).
fof(c_0_11,plain,
( navypersonnel(c_tptpnavypersonnel_3)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member1672_mt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_790])]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
~ tptpofobject(c_tptpnavypersonnel_3,f_tptpquantityfn_6(n_414)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( ~ militaryperson(X1)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member698_mt)
| tptpofobject(X1,f_tptpquantityfn_6(n_414)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( ~ navypersonnel(X1)
| militaryperson(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member1672_mt)
| navypersonnel(c_tptpnavypersonnel_3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
fof(c_0_16,plain,
! [X30,X31] :
( mtvisible(X31)
| ~ genlmt(X30,X31)
| ~ mtvisible(X30) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_44208])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member698_mt)
| ~ militaryperson(c_tptpnavypersonnel_3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member1672_mt)
| militaryperson(c_tptpnavypersonnel_3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( ~ genlmt(X1,X2)
| ~ mtvisible(X1)
| mtvisible(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member698_mt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax3_1540]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member1672_mt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax3_303]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member1672_mt)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member698_mt) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
mtvisible(c_tptp_member698_mt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_21])]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
mtvisible(c_tptp_member1672_mt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_22]),c_0_21])]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24])]),c_0_25])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : CSR071+4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.37 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:40:29 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.38 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/0.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.52/1.41 % Version: 3.5.1
% 1.52/1.41 % Preprocessing class: FMLLLMSLSSSNFFN.
% 1.52/1.41 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.52/1.41 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.52/1.41 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.52/1.41 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.52/1.41 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 1.52/1.41 % new_bool_1 with pid 2567350 completed with status 0
% 1.52/1.41 % Result found by new_bool_1
% 1.52/1.41 % Preprocessing class: FMLLLMSLSSSNFFN.
% 1.52/1.41 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.52/1.41 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.52/1.41 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.52/1.41 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.52/1.41 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 1.52/1.41 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 1.52/1.41 % Search class: FHHSM-FFMM31-SFFFFFNN
% 1.52/1.41 % partial match(1): FGHSM-FFMM31-SFFFFFNN
% 1.52/1.41 % Scheduled 11 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 1.52/1.41 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 1.52/1.41 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2567352 completed with status 0
% 1.52/1.41 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 1.52/1.41 % Preprocessing class: FMLLLMSLSSSNFFN.
% 1.52/1.41 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.52/1.41 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.52/1.41 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.52/1.41 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.52/1.41 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 1.52/1.41 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 1.52/1.41 % Search class: FHHSM-FFMM31-SFFFFFNN
% 1.52/1.41 % partial match(1): FGHSM-FFMM31-SFFFFFNN
% 1.52/1.41 % Scheduled 11 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 1.52/1.41 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 1.52/1.41 % Preprocessing time : 0.018 s
% 1.52/1.41
% 1.52/1.41 % Proof found!
% 1.52/1.41 % SZS status Theorem
% 1.52/1.41 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.52/1.41 % Parsed axioms : 44217
% 1.52/1.41 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 44137
% 1.52/1.41 % Initial clauses : 81
% 1.52/1.41 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 1
% 1.52/1.41 % Initial clauses in saturation : 80
% 1.52/1.41 % Processed clauses : 92
% 1.52/1.41 % ...of these trivial : 8
% 1.52/1.41 % ...subsumed : 12
% 1.52/1.41 % ...remaining for further processing : 71
% 1.52/1.41 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 1.52/1.41 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 1.52/1.41 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 1.52/1.41 % Backward-rewritten : 9
% 1.52/1.41 % Generated clauses : 28
% 1.52/1.41 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 28
% 1.52/1.41 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 1.52/1.41 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 1.52/1.41 % Paramodulations : 27
% 1.52/1.41 % Factorizations : 0
% 1.52/1.41 % NegExts : 0
% 1.52/1.41 % Equation resolutions : 1
% 1.52/1.41 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 1.52/1.41 % Total rewrite steps : 25
% 1.52/1.41 % ...of those cached : 16
% 1.52/1.41 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 1.52/1.41 % Propositional check models : 0
% 1.52/1.41 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 1.52/1.41 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 1.52/1.41 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 1.52/1.41 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 1.52/1.41 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 1.52/1.41 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 1.52/1.41 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 1.52/1.41 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 1.52/1.41 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 1.52/1.41 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 1.52/1.41 % Current number of processed clauses : 61
% 1.52/1.41 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 40
% 1.52/1.41 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 1.52/1.41 % Negative unit clauses : 3
% 1.52/1.41 % Non-unit-clauses : 18
% 1.52/1.41 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 16
% 1.52/1.41 % ...number of literals in the above : 24
% 1.52/1.41 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 1.52/1.41 % Current number of archived clauses : 9
% 1.52/1.41 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 166
% 1.52/1.41 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 156
% 1.52/1.41 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 11
% 1.52/1.41 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 13
% 1.52/1.41 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 1.52/1.41 % BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 1.52/1.41 % BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 1.52/1.41 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 1.52/1.41 % Condensation successes : 0
% 1.52/1.41 % Termbank termtop insertions : 295060
% 1.52/1.41 % Search garbage collected termcells : 157719
% 1.52/1.41
% 1.52/1.41 % -------------------------------------------------
% 1.52/1.41 % User time : 0.118 s
% 1.52/1.41 % System time : 0.065 s
% 1.52/1.41 % Total time : 0.183 s
% 1.52/1.41 % Maximum resident set size: 84020 pages
% 1.52/1.41
% 1.52/1.41 % -------------------------------------------------
% 1.52/1.41 % User time : 0.841 s
% 1.52/1.41 % System time : 0.118 s
% 1.52/1.41 % Total time : 0.959 s
% 1.52/1.41 % Maximum resident set size: 38144 pages
% 1.52/1.41 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------