%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR071+6 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:18:33 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.18s 110.18s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.18s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 27 ( 9 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 51 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 44 ( 20 ~; 15 |; 3 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 6 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 5 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 12 ( 0 sgn 8 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query321,conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt)
=> tptpofobject(c_tptpnavypersonnel_3,f_tptpquantityfn_6(n_414)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query321) ).
fof(ax5_2632201,axiom,
! [X4] :
( ( militaryperson(X4)
& mtvisible(c_tptp_member698_mt) )
=> tptpofobject(X4,f_tptpquantityfn_6(n_414)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+5.ax',ax5_2632201) ).
fof(ax5_2453508,axiom,
! [X1] :
( navypersonnel(X1)
=> militaryperson(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+5.ax',ax5_2453508) ).
fof(ax5_1132230,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_tptp_member1672_mt)
=> navypersonnel(c_tptpnavypersonnel_3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+5.ax',ax5_1132230) ).
fof(ax5_3342125,axiom,
! [X32,X33] :
( ( genlmt(X32,X33)
& mtvisible(X32) )
=> mtvisible(X33) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+5.ax',ax5_3342125) ).
fof(ax5_427380,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member1672_mt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+5.ax',ax5_427380) ).
fof(ax5_1408983,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member698_mt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+5.ax',ax5_1408983) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ ( mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt)
=> tptpofobject(c_tptpnavypersonnel_3,f_tptpquantityfn_6(n_414)) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query321]) ).
fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( ~ tptpofobject(c_tptpnavypersonnel_3,f_tptpquantityfn_6(n_414))
& mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X38] :
( tptpofobject(X38,f_tptpquantityfn_6(n_414))
| ~ militaryperson(X38)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member698_mt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax5_2632201])])]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X618] :
( militaryperson(X618)
| ~ navypersonnel(X618) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax5_2453508])])]) ).
fof(c_0_11,plain,
( navypersonnel(c_tptpnavypersonnel_3)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member1672_mt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax5_1132230])]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
~ tptpofobject(c_tptpnavypersonnel_3,f_tptpquantityfn_6(n_414)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( ~ militaryperson(X1)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member698_mt)
| tptpofobject(X1,f_tptpquantityfn_6(n_414)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( ~ navypersonnel(X1)
| militaryperson(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member1672_mt)
| navypersonnel(c_tptpnavypersonnel_3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
fof(c_0_16,plain,
! [X631,X632] :
( mtvisible(X632)
| ~ genlmt(X631,X632)
| ~ mtvisible(X631) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax5_3342125])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member698_mt)
| ~ militaryperson(c_tptpnavypersonnel_3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member1672_mt)
| militaryperson(c_tptpnavypersonnel_3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( ~ genlmt(X1,X2)
| ~ mtvisible(X1)
| mtvisible(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member1672_mt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax5_427380]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member698_mt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax5_1408983]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member1672_mt)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member698_mt) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
mtvisible(c_tptp_member1672_mt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_21])]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
mtvisible(c_tptp_member698_mt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_22]),c_0_21])]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24])]),c_0_25])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : CSR071+6 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.3.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/5.38 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.09/5.38 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/5.38 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/5.38 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/5.38 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/5.38 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/5.38 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/5.38 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:45:39 UTC 2026
% 0.09/5.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/5.38 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/5.43 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/5.43 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/110.18 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.18/110.18 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/110.18 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 242 seconds (1936 total)
% 0.18/110.18 % Starting new_ho_10 with 484s (2) cores
% 0.18/110.18 % Starting sh3 with 484s (2) cores
% 0.18/110.18 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 484s (2) cores
% 0.18/110.18 % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 484s (2) cores
% 0.18/110.18 % new_ho_10 with pid 3754671 completed with status 0
% 0.18/110.18 % Result found by new_ho_10
% 0.18/110.18 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/110.18 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 242 seconds (1936 total)
% 0.18/110.18 % Starting new_ho_10 with 484s (2) cores
% 0.18/110.18 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.18/110.18 % SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.18/110.18 % Search class: FHHSM-SMLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.18/110.18 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 2 cores with 458 seconds (458 total)
% 0.18/110.18 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 42s (1) cores
% 0.18/110.18 % Starting new_ho_10 with 46s (1) cores
% 0.18/110.18 % new_ho_10 with pid 3755328 completed with status 0
% 0.18/110.18 % Result found by new_ho_10
% 0.18/110.18 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/110.18 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 242 seconds (1936 total)
% 0.18/110.18 % Starting new_ho_10 with 484s (2) cores
% 0.18/110.18 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.18/110.18 % SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.18/110.18 % Search class: FHHSM-SMLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.18/110.18 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 2 cores with 458 seconds (458 total)
% 0.18/110.18 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 42s (1) cores
% 0.18/110.18 % Starting new_ho_10 with 46s (1) cores
% 0.18/110.18 % Preprocessing time : 3.804 s
% 0.18/110.18 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.18/110.18
% 0.18/110.18 % Proof found!
% 0.18/110.18 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.18/110.18 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.18/110.19 % Parsed axioms : 3341978
% 0.18/110.19 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 3321977
% 0.18/110.19 % Initial clauses : 20002
% 0.18/110.19 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 2
% 0.18/110.19 % Initial clauses in saturation : 20000
% 0.18/110.19 % Processed clauses : 23496
% 0.18/110.19 % ...of these trivial : 2612
% 0.18/110.19 % ...subsumed : 203
% 0.18/110.19 % ...remaining for further processing : 20680
% 0.18/110.19 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 0.18/110.19 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.18/110.19 % Backward-subsumed : 32
% 0.18/110.19 % Backward-rewritten : 1018
% 0.18/110.19 % Generated clauses : 2501
% 0.18/110.19 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2112
% 0.18/110.19 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.18/110.19 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.18/110.19 % Paramodulations : 2500
% 0.18/110.19 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.18/110.19 % NegExts : 0
% 0.18/110.19 % Equation resolutions : 1
% 0.18/110.19 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.18/110.19 % Total rewrite steps : 4058
% 0.18/110.19 % ...of those cached : 518
% 0.18/110.19 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.18/110.19 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.18/110.19 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.18/110.19 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.18/110.19 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.18/110.19 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.18/110.19 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.18/110.19 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.18/110.19 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.18/110.19 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.18/110.19 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.18/110.19 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.18/110.19 % Current number of processed clauses : 3416
% 0.18/110.19 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 2083
% 0.18/110.19 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.18/110.19 % Negative unit clauses : 390
% 0.18/110.19 % Non-unit-clauses : 943
% 0.18/110.19 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 14829
% 0.18/110.19 % ...number of literals in the above : 22352
% 0.18/110.19 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.18/110.19 % Current number of archived clauses : 17263
% 0.18/110.19 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2247705
% 0.18/110.19 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2026660
% 0.18/110.19 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 210
% 0.18/110.19 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 245038
% 0.18/110.19 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.18/110.19 % BW rewrite match attempts : 46590
% 0.18/110.19 % BW rewrite match successes : 1009
% 0.18/110.19 % Condensation attempts : 23496
% 0.18/110.19 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.18/110.19 % Termbank termtop insertions : 22730360
% 0.18/110.19 % Search garbage collected termcells : 10464439
% 0.18/110.19
% 0.18/110.19 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/110.19 % User time : 30.824 s
% 0.18/110.19 % System time : 10.280 s
% 0.18/110.19 % Total time : 41.105 s
% 0.18/110.19 % Maximum resident set size: 5023888 pages
% 0.18/110.19
% 0.18/110.19 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/110.19 % User time : 98.487 s
% 0.18/110.19 % System time : 17.222 s
% 0.18/110.19 % Total time : 115.708 s
% 0.18/110.19 % Maximum resident set size: 2273536 pages
% 0.18/110.19 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------