%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : CSR071+6 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:47:25 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 74.84s 66.91s
% Output : CNFRefutation 74.84s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 22 ( 13 unt; 0 nHn; 22 RR)
% Number of literals : 35 ( 0 equ; 17 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 5 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 8 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_2855,plain,
( mtvisible(X1)
| ~ mtvisible(X2)
| ~ genlmt(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-0ugouild/input.p',i_0_2855) ).
cnf(i_0_3076,plain,
genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member1672_mt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-0ugouild/input.p',i_0_3076) ).
cnf(i_0_3861,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-0ugouild/input.p',i_0_3861) ).
cnf(i_0_3860,negated_conjecture,
~ tptpofobject(c_tptpnavypersonnel_3,f_tptpquantityfn_6(n_414)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-0ugouild/input.p',i_0_3860) ).
cnf(i_0_2214,plain,
( tptpofobject(X1,f_tptpquantityfn_6(n_414))
| ~ militaryperson(X1)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member698_mt) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-0ugouild/input.p',i_0_2214) ).
cnf(i_0_559,plain,
genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member698_mt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-0ugouild/input.p',i_0_559) ).
cnf(i_0_190,plain,
( navypersonnel(c_tptpnavypersonnel_3)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member1672_mt) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-0ugouild/input.p',i_0_190) ).
cnf(i_0_1967,plain,
( militaryperson(X1)
| ~ navypersonnel(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-0ugouild/input.p',i_0_1967) ).
cnf(c_0_3870,plain,
( mtvisible(X1)
| ~ mtvisible(X2)
| ~ genlmt(X2,X1) ),
i_0_2855 ).
cnf(c_0_3871,plain,
genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member1672_mt),
i_0_3076 ).
cnf(c_0_3872,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt),
i_0_3861 ).
cnf(c_0_3873,negated_conjecture,
~ tptpofobject(c_tptpnavypersonnel_3,f_tptpquantityfn_6(n_414)),
i_0_3860 ).
cnf(c_0_3874,plain,
( tptpofobject(X1,f_tptpquantityfn_6(n_414))
| ~ militaryperson(X1)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member698_mt) ),
i_0_2214 ).
cnf(c_0_3875,plain,
genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member698_mt),
i_0_559 ).
cnf(c_0_3876,plain,
( navypersonnel(c_tptpnavypersonnel_3)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member1672_mt) ),
i_0_190 ).
cnf(c_0_3877,plain,
mtvisible(c_tptp_member1672_mt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3870,c_0_3871]),c_0_3872])]) ).
cnf(c_0_3878,negated_conjecture,
( ~ militaryperson(c_tptpnavypersonnel_3)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member698_mt) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3873,c_0_3874]) ).
cnf(c_0_3879,plain,
mtvisible(c_tptp_member698_mt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3870,c_0_3875]),c_0_3872])]) ).
cnf(c_0_3880,plain,
( militaryperson(X1)
| ~ navypersonnel(X1) ),
i_0_1967 ).
cnf(c_0_3881,plain,
navypersonnel(c_tptpnavypersonnel_3),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_3876,c_0_3877])]) ).
cnf(c_0_3882,negated_conjecture,
~ militaryperson(c_tptpnavypersonnel_3),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_3878,c_0_3879])]) ).
cnf(c_0_3883,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3880,c_0_3881]),c_0_3882]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : CSR071+6 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.3.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 04:28:11 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.46 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 63.17/63.40 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 63.17/63.40 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 63.17/63.40 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 63.17/63.40 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 74.84/66.91 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN:
% 74.84/66.91 # Version: 2.1pre011
% 74.84/66.91 # Preprocessing time : 0.102 s
% 74.84/66.91
% 74.84/66.91 # Proof found!
% 74.84/66.91 # SZS status Theorem
% 74.84/66.91 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 74.84/66.91 # Proof object total steps : 22
% 74.84/66.91 # Proof object clause steps : 14
% 74.84/66.91 # Proof object formula steps : 8
% 74.84/66.91 # Proof object conjectures : 6
% 74.84/66.91 # Proof object clause conjectures : 4
% 74.84/66.91 # Proof object formula conjectures : 2
% 74.84/66.91 # Proof object initial clauses used : 8
% 74.84/66.91 # Proof object initial formulas used : 8
% 74.84/66.91 # Proof object generating inferences : 4
% 74.84/66.91 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 9
% 74.84/66.91 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 74.84/66.91 # Parsed axioms : 3859
% 74.84/66.91 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 74.84/66.91 # Initial clauses : 3859
% 74.84/66.91 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 74.84/66.91 # Initial clauses in saturation : 3859
% 74.84/66.91 # Processed clauses : 4264
% 74.84/66.91 # ...of these trivial : 385
% 74.84/66.91 # ...subsumed : 75
% 74.84/66.91 # ...remaining for further processing : 3804
% 74.84/66.91 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 9
% 74.84/66.91 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 74.84/66.91 # Backward-subsumed : 6
% 74.84/66.91 # Backward-rewritten : 185
% 74.84/66.91 # Generated clauses : 4171
% 74.84/66.91 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 3602
% 74.84/66.91 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 16
% 74.84/66.91 # Paramodulations : 4162
% 74.84/66.91 # Factorizations : 0
% 74.84/66.91 # Equation resolutions : 9
% 74.84/66.91 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 74.84/66.91 # Propositional unsat check successes : 0
% 74.84/66.91 # Current number of processed clauses : 3604
% 74.84/66.91 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 2026
% 74.84/66.91 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 74.84/66.91 # Negative unit clauses : 176
% 74.84/66.91 # Non-unit-clauses : 1402
% 74.84/66.91 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2692
% 74.84/66.91 # ...number of literals in the above : 4961
% 74.84/66.91 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 74.84/66.91 # Current number of archived clauses : 191
% 74.84/66.91 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 216820
% 74.84/66.91 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 179673
% 74.84/66.91 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 90
% 74.84/66.91 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 245071
% 74.84/66.91 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 74.84/66.91 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1738
% 74.84/66.91 # BW rewrite match successes : 135
% 74.84/66.91 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 74.84/66.91 # Condensation successes : 0
% 74.84/66.91 # Termbank termtop insertions : 92717
% 74.84/66.91
% 74.84/66.91 # -------------------------------------------------
% 74.84/66.91 # User time : 0.332 s
% 74.84/66.91 # System time : 0.010 s
% 74.84/66.91 # Total time : 0.342 s
% 74.84/66.91 # ...preprocessing : 0.102 s
% 74.84/66.91 # ...main loop : 0.240 s
% 74.84/66.91 # Maximum resident set size: 25976 pages
% 74.84/66.91
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------