%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : FindProof---0.1
% Problem : CSR072+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_findproof /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 01:05:44 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 6.27s 1.22s
% Output : Proof 6.27s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 22 ( 14 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 34 ( 9 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 31 ( 19 ~; 6 |; 4 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 10 ( 10 usr; 6 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 18 ( 2 sgn 9 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f6,axiom,
genls(c_tptpcol_16_130924,c_tptpcol_15_130923),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',just7) ).
fof(f6_nnf,plain,
genls(c_tptpcol_16_130924,c_tptpcol_15_130923),
inference(nnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f6]) ).
cnf(c6,plain,
genls(c_tptpcol_16_130924,c_tptpcol_15_130923),
inference(cnf_transformation,[status(esa)],[f6_nnf]) ).
cnf(t17,plain,
genls(c_tptpcol_16_130924,c_tptpcol_15_130923) = true,
inference(equality_encoding,[status(esa)],[c6]) ).
cnf(t118,plain,
genls(c_tptpcol_16_130924,c_tptpcol_15_130923) = true,
inference(orient,[status(thm)],[t17]) ).
cnf(t23,plain,
ifeq(X1,X1,X2,X3) = X2,
introduced(definition) ).
cnf(t81,plain,
ifeq(X1,X1,X2,X3) = X2,
inference(orient,[status(thm)],[t23]) ).
fof(f8,axiom,
! [OBJ,COL1,COL2] :
~ ( disjointwith(COL1,COL2)
& isa(OBJ,COL2)
& isa(OBJ,COL1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',just9) ).
fof(f8_nnf,plain,
! [OBJ,COL1,COL2] :
( ~ disjointwith(COL1,COL2)
| ~ isa(OBJ,COL2)
| ~ isa(OBJ,COL1) ),
inference(nnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f8]) ).
fof(f8_sk,plain,
! [OBJ,COL1,COL2] :
( ~ disjointwith(COL1,COL2)
| ~ isa(OBJ,COL2)
| ~ isa(OBJ,COL1) ),
inference(skolemisation,[status(esa)],[f8_nnf]) ).
cnf(c8,plain,
( ~ disjointwith(X1,X2)
| ~ isa(X0,X2)
| ~ isa(X0,X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[status(esa)],[f8_sk]) ).
fof(f66,conjecture,
( mtvisible(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwarthritis_symptomcoma_cbursitishtm)),c_translation_0_885))
=> genls(c_tptpcol_16_130924,c_tptpcol_15_130923) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query72) ).
fof(f66_neg,negated_conjecture,
~ ( mtvisible(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwarthritis_symptomcoma_cbursitishtm)),c_translation_0_885))
=> genls(c_tptpcol_16_130924,c_tptpcol_15_130923) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f66]) ).
fof(f66_nnf,plain,
( ~ genls(c_tptpcol_16_130924,c_tptpcol_15_130923)
& mtvisible(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwarthritis_symptomcoma_cbursitishtm)),c_translation_0_885)) ),
inference(nnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f66_neg]) ).
fof(f66_sk,plain,
( ~ genls(c_tptpcol_16_130924,c_tptpcol_15_130923)
& mtvisible(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwarthritis_symptomcoma_cbursitishtm)),c_translation_0_885)) ),
inference(skolemisation,[status(esa)],[f66_nnf]) ).
cnf(c67,plain,
~ genls(c_tptpcol_16_130924,c_tptpcol_15_130923),
inference(cnf_transformation,[status(esa)],[f66_sk]) ).
cnf(goal_0,negated_conjecture,
true != false,
inference(equality_encoding,[status(esa)],[c8,c67]) ).
cnf(g0_0,plain,
true != ifeq(genls(c_tptpcol_16_130924,c_tptpcol_15_130923),true,false,true),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[goal_0]) ).
cnf(g0_1,plain,
true != ifeq(genls(c_tptpcol_16_130924,c_tptpcol_15_130923),true,false,genls(c_tptpcol_16_130924,c_tptpcol_15_130923)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[g0_0,t118]) ).
cnf(g0_2,plain,
true != ifeq(true,true,false,genls(c_tptpcol_16_130924,c_tptpcol_15_130923)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[g0_1,t118]) ).
cnf(g0_3,plain,
true != false,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[g0_2,t81]) ).
cnf(contradiction_0,plain,
$false,
inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[g0_3]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : CSR072+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_findproof /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.10/0.36 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36 % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 08:57:19 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.37 Running run_findproof /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 6.27/1.22 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 6.27/1.22 % SZS output start Proof for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------