%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR072+5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v3.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:16:32 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.17s 18.92s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.17s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 7 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 10 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 6 ( 3 ~; 0 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn 0 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query272,conjecture,
( mtvisible(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwarthritis_symptomcoma_cbursitishtm)),c_translation_0_885))
=> genls(c_tptpcol_16_130924,c_tptpcol_15_130923) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query272) ).
fof(ax4_111098,axiom,
genls(c_tptpcol_16_130924,c_tptpcol_15_130923),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+4.ax',ax4_111098) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ( mtvisible(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwarthritis_symptomcoma_cbursitishtm)),c_translation_0_885))
=> genls(c_tptpcol_16_130924,c_tptpcol_15_130923) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query272]) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
( ~ genls(c_tptpcol_16_130924,c_tptpcol_15_130923)
& mtvisible(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwarthritis_symptomcoma_cbursitishtm)),c_translation_0_885)) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ genls(c_tptpcol_16_130924,c_tptpcol_15_130923),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
genls(c_tptpcol_16_130924,c_tptpcol_15_130923),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax4_111098]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : CSR072+5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v3.5.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.37 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:43:51 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.17/18.92 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.17/18.92 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/18.92 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 287 seconds (2296 total)
% 0.17/18.92 % Starting new_ho_10 with 574s (2) cores
% 0.17/18.92 % Starting sh3 with 574s (2) cores
% 0.17/18.92 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 574s (2) cores
% 0.17/18.92 % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 574s (2) cores
% 0.17/18.92 % ho_unfolding_3 with pid 1346646 completed with status 0
% 0.17/18.92 % Result found by ho_unfolding_3
% 0.17/18.92 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/18.92 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 287 seconds (2296 total)
% 0.17/18.92 % Starting new_ho_10 with 574s (2) cores
% 0.17/18.92 % Starting sh3 with 574s (2) cores
% 0.17/18.92 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 574s (2) cores
% 0.17/18.92 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.17/18.92 % SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.17/18.92 % Search class: FHHSM-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.17/18.92 % partial match(1): FGHSM-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.17/18.92 % Scheduled 8 strats onto 2 cores with 570 seconds (570 total)
% 0.17/18.92 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 52s (1) cores
% 0.17/18.92 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 58s (1) cores
% 0.17/18.92 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1346650 completed with status 0
% 0.17/18.92 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.17/18.92 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/18.92 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 287 seconds (2296 total)
% 0.17/18.92 % Starting new_ho_10 with 574s (2) cores
% 0.17/18.92 % Starting sh3 with 574s (2) cores
% 0.17/18.92 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 574s (2) cores
% 0.17/18.92 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.17/18.92 % SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.17/18.92 % Search class: FHHSM-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.17/18.92 % partial match(1): FGHSM-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.17/18.92 % Scheduled 8 strats onto 2 cores with 570 seconds (570 total)
% 0.17/18.92 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 52s (1) cores
% 0.17/18.92 % Preprocessing time : 0.217 s
% 0.17/18.92
% 0.17/18.92 % Proof found!
% 0.17/18.92 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.17/18.92 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.17/18.92 % Parsed axioms : 540250
% 0.17/18.92 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 539678
% 0.17/18.92 % Initial clauses : 573
% 0.17/18.92 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 2
% 0.17/18.92 % Initial clauses in saturation : 571
% 0.17/18.92 % Processed clauses : 105
% 0.17/18.92 % ...of these trivial : 14
% 0.17/18.92 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.17/18.92 % ...remaining for further processing : 90
% 0.17/18.92 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 0.17/18.92 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.17/18.92 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.17/18.92 % Backward-rewritten : 11
% 0.17/18.92 % Generated clauses : 1
% 0.17/18.92 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1
% 0.17/18.92 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.17/18.92 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.17/18.92 % Paramodulations : 0
% 0.17/18.92 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.17/18.92 % NegExts : 0
% 0.17/18.92 % Equation resolutions : 1
% 0.17/18.92 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.17/18.92 % Total rewrite steps : 26
% 0.17/18.92 % ...of those cached : 3
% 0.17/18.92 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.17/18.92 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.17/18.92 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.17/18.92 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.17/18.92 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.17/18.92 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.17/18.92 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.17/18.92 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.17/18.92 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.17/18.92 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.17/18.92 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.17/18.92 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.17/18.92 % Current number of processed clauses : 78
% 0.17/18.92 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 75
% 0.17/18.92 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.17/18.92 % Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.17/18.92 % Non-unit-clauses : 1
% 0.17/18.92 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 467
% 0.17/18.92 % ...number of literals in the above : 660
% 0.17/18.92 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.17/18.92 % Current number of archived clauses : 11
% 0.17/18.92 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.17/18.92 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.17/18.92 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.17/18.92 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 6
% 0.17/18.92 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.17/18.92 % BW rewrite match attempts : 11
% 0.17/18.92 % BW rewrite match successes : 11
% 0.17/18.92 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.17/18.92 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.17/18.92 % Termbank termtop insertions : 3695254
% 0.17/18.92 % Search garbage collected termcells : 2173380
% 0.17/18.92
% 0.17/18.92 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/18.92 % User time : 3.292 s
% 0.17/18.92 % System time : 1.500 s
% 0.17/18.92 % Total time : 4.792 s
% 0.17/18.92 % Maximum resident set size: 1242144 pages
% 0.17/18.92
% 0.17/18.92 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/18.92 % User time : 16.100 s
% 0.17/18.92 % System time : 2.498 s
% 0.17/18.92 % Total time : 18.598 s
% 0.17/18.92 % Maximum resident set size: 456960 pages
% 0.17/18.92 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------