%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR072-10 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:18:33 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.29s 0.62s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.29s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 11 ( 11 unt; 0 nHn; 9 RR)
% Number of literals : 11 ( 10 equ; 3 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 5 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 6 ( 2 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(query172_1,negated_conjecture,
ifeq3(genls(c_tptpcol_16_130924,c_tptpcol_15_130923),true,a,b) = b,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query172_1) ).
cnf(ax2_4304,axiom,
genls(c_tptpcol_16_130924,c_tptpcol_15_130923) = true,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax2_4304) ).
cnf(goal,negated_conjecture,
a != b,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goal) ).
cnf(ifeq_axiom_001,axiom,
ifeq3(X1,X1,X2,X3) = X2,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ifeq_axiom_001) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
ifeq3(genls(c_tptpcol_16_130924,c_tptpcol_15_130923),true,a,b) = b,
query172_1 ).
cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
genls(c_tptpcol_16_130924,c_tptpcol_15_130923) = true,
ax2_4304 ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
a != b,
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[goal]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
ifeq3(true,true,a,b) = b,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
ifeq3(X1,X1,X2,X3) = X2,
ifeq_axiom_001 ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
a != b,
c_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_9]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : CSR072-10 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.37 % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:51:15 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.29/0.62 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.29/0.62 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.29/0.62 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.29/0.62 % Starting new_bool_3 with 900s (3) cores
% 0.29/0.62 % Starting new_bool_1 with 900s (3) cores
% 0.29/0.62 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.29/0.62 % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 300s (1) cores
% 0.29/0.62 % new_bool_1 with pid 3393326 completed with status 0
% 0.29/0.62 % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.29/0.62 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.29/0.62 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.29/0.62 % Starting new_bool_3 with 900s (3) cores
% 0.29/0.62 % Starting new_bool_1 with 900s (3) cores
% 0.29/0.62 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.29/0.62 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.29/0.62 % Search class: FUUPM-FFMM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.29/0.62 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 3 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
% 0.29/0.62 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 91s (1) cores
% 0.29/0.62 % Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 541s (1) cores
% 0.29/0.62 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 91s (1) cores
% 0.29/0.62 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 3393334 completed with status 0
% 0.29/0.62 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.29/0.62 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.29/0.62 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.29/0.62 % Starting new_bool_3 with 900s (3) cores
% 0.29/0.62 % Starting new_bool_1 with 900s (3) cores
% 0.29/0.62 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.29/0.62 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.29/0.62 % Search class: FUUPM-FFMM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.29/0.62 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 3 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
% 0.29/0.62 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 91s (1) cores
% 0.29/0.62 % Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 541s (1) cores
% 0.29/0.62 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 91s (1) cores
% 0.29/0.62 % Preprocessing time : 0.006 s
% 0.29/0.62 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.29/0.62
% 0.29/0.62 % Proof found!
% 0.29/0.62 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.29/0.62 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.29/0.62 % Parsed axioms : 8012
% 0.29/0.62 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 7977
% 0.29/0.62 % Initial clauses : 35
% 0.29/0.62 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.29/0.62 % Initial clauses in saturation : 35
% 0.29/0.62 % Processed clauses : 9
% 0.29/0.62 % ...of these trivial : 1
% 0.29/0.62 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.29/0.62 % ...remaining for further processing : 8
% 0.29/0.62 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.29/0.62 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.29/0.62 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.29/0.62 % Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.29/0.62 % Generated clauses : 0
% 0.29/0.62 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.29/0.62 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.29/0.62 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.29/0.62 % Paramodulations : 0
% 0.29/0.62 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.29/0.62 % NegExts : 0
% 0.29/0.62 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.29/0.62 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.29/0.62 % Total rewrite steps : 3
% 0.29/0.62 % ...of those cached : 1
% 0.29/0.62 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.29/0.62 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.29/0.62 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.29/0.62 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.29/0.62 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.29/0.62 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.29/0.62 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.29/0.62 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.29/0.62 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.29/0.62 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.29/0.62 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.29/0.62 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.29/0.62 % Current number of processed clauses : 7
% 0.29/0.62 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 6
% 0.29/0.62 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.29/0.62 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.29/0.62 % Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.29/0.62 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 26
% 0.29/0.62 % ...number of literals in the above : 26
% 0.29/0.62 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.29/0.62 % Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.29/0.62 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.29/0.62 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.29/0.62 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.29/0.62 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.29/0.62 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.29/0.62 % BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.29/0.62 % BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.29/0.62 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.29/0.62 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.29/0.62 % Termbank termtop insertions : 58462
% 0.29/0.62 % Search garbage collected termcells : 23377
% 0.29/0.62
% 0.29/0.62 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.29/0.62 % User time : 0.028 s
% 0.29/0.62 % System time : 0.025 s
% 0.29/0.62 % Total time : 0.053 s
% 0.29/0.62 % Maximum resident set size: 19204 pages
% 0.29/0.62
% 0.29/0.62 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.29/0.62 % User time : 0.158 s
% 0.29/0.62 % System time : 0.044 s
% 0.29/0.62 % Total time : 0.202 s
% 0.29/0.62 % Maximum resident set size: 10240 pages
% 0.29/0.62 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------