%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR073+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:16:32 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.33s 0.46s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.33s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 31 ( 8 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 57 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 46 ( 20 ~; 16 |; 2 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 8 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 8 ( 7 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 39 ( 2 sgn 21 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query123,conjecture,
? [X5] :
( mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt)
=> tptptypes_5_387(X5,c_pushingababycarriage) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query123) ).
fof(ax1_409,axiom,
! [X5,X6] :
( tptptypes_7_396(X5,X6)
=> tptptypes_6_388(X5,X6) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_409) ).
fof(ax1_174,axiom,
! [X5,X6] :
( tptptypes_8_400(X5,X6)
=> tptptypes_7_396(X5,X6) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_174) ).
fof(ax1_1123,axiom,
! [X20,X21] :
( ( genlmt(X20,X21)
& mtvisible(X20) )
=> mtvisible(X21) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_1123) ).
fof(ax1_108,axiom,
! [X5,X6] :
( tptptypes_9_401(X5,X6)
=> tptptypes_8_400(X6,X5) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_108) ).
fof(ax1_157,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_tptp_member237_mt)
=> tptptypes_9_401(c_pushingababycarriage,c_tptpcol_16_10258) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_157) ).
fof(ax1_198,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member237_mt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_198) ).
fof(ax1_99,axiom,
! [X5,X6] :
( tptptypes_6_388(X5,X6)
=> tptptypes_5_387(X5,X6) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_99) ).
fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X5] :
( mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt)
=> tptptypes_5_387(X5,c_pushingababycarriage) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query123]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X35,X36] :
( tptptypes_6_388(X35,X36)
| ~ tptptypes_7_396(X35,X36) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_409])])]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X65,X66] :
( tptptypes_7_396(X65,X66)
| ~ tptptypes_8_400(X65,X66) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_174])])]) ).
fof(c_0_11,plain,
! [X31,X32] :
( mtvisible(X32)
| ~ genlmt(X31,X32)
| ~ mtvisible(X31) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_1123])])]) ).
fof(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
! [X22] :
( ~ tptptypes_5_387(X22,c_pushingababycarriage)
& mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( ~ tptptypes_7_396(X1,X2)
| tptptypes_6_388(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( ~ tptptypes_8_400(X1,X2)
| tptptypes_7_396(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
fof(c_0_15,plain,
! [X41,X42] :
( tptptypes_8_400(X42,X41)
| ~ tptptypes_9_401(X41,X42) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_108])])]) ).
fof(c_0_16,plain,
( tptptypes_9_401(c_pushingababycarriage,c_tptpcol_16_10258)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member237_mt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_157])]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( ~ genlmt(X1,X2)
| ~ mtvisible(X1)
| mtvisible(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member237_mt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax1_198]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
fof(c_0_20,plain,
! [X23,X24] :
( tptptypes_5_387(X23,X24)
| ~ tptptypes_6_388(X23,X24) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_99])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( ~ tptptypes_8_400(X1,X2)
| tptptypes_6_388(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( ~ tptptypes_9_401(X1,X2)
| tptptypes_8_400(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member237_mt)
| tptptypes_9_401(c_pushingababycarriage,c_tptpcol_16_10258) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
mtvisible(c_tptp_member237_mt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_19])]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
~ tptptypes_5_387(X1,c_pushingababycarriage),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( ~ tptptypes_6_388(X1,X2)
| tptptypes_5_387(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( ~ tptptypes_9_401(X2,X1)
| tptptypes_6_388(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
tptptypes_9_401(c_pushingababycarriage,c_tptpcol_16_10258),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24])]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
~ tptptypes_6_388(X1,c_pushingababycarriage),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]),c_0_29]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : CSR073+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.36 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:46:12 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/0.36 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/0.40 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.40 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.33/0.46 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.33/0.46 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.33/0.46 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.33/0.46 % Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (3) cores
% 0.33/0.46 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.33/0.46 % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.33/0.46 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.33/0.46 % sh5l with pid 2021350 completed with status 0
% 0.33/0.46 % Result found by sh5l
% 0.33/0.46 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.33/0.46 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.33/0.46 % Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (3) cores
% 0.33/0.46 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.33/0.46 % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.33/0.46 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.33/0.46 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.33/0.46 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.33/0.46 % Search class: FHHNM-FSMM31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.33/0.46 % partial match(2): FGHSM-FSMM31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.33/0.46 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.33/0.46 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.33/0.46 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2021354 completed with status 0
% 0.33/0.46 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.33/0.46 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.33/0.46 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.33/0.46 % Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (3) cores
% 0.33/0.46 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.33/0.46 % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.33/0.46 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.33/0.46 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.33/0.46 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.33/0.46 % Search class: FHHNM-FSMM31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.33/0.46 % partial match(2): FGHSM-FSMM31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.33/0.46 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.33/0.46 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.33/0.46 % Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 0.33/0.46
% 0.33/0.46 % Proof found!
% 0.33/0.46 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.33/0.46 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.33/0.46 % Parsed axioms : 1132
% 0.33/0.46 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 887
% 0.33/0.46 % Initial clauses : 246
% 0.33/0.46 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.33/0.46 % Initial clauses in saturation : 246
% 0.33/0.46 % Processed clauses : 596
% 0.33/0.46 % ...of these trivial : 18
% 0.33/0.46 % ...subsumed : 45
% 0.33/0.46 % ...remaining for further processing : 533
% 0.33/0.46 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.33/0.46 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.33/0.46 % Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.33/0.46 % Backward-rewritten : 24
% 0.33/0.46 % Generated clauses : 971
% 0.33/0.46 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 586
% 0.33/0.46 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.33/0.46 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.33/0.46 % Paramodulations : 971
% 0.33/0.46 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.33/0.46 % NegExts : 0
% 0.33/0.46 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.33/0.46 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.33/0.46 % Total rewrite steps : 338
% 0.33/0.46 % ...of those cached : 226
% 0.33/0.46 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.33/0.46 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.33/0.46 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.33/0.46 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.33/0.46 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.33/0.46 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.33/0.46 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.33/0.46 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.33/0.46 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.33/0.46 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.33/0.46 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.33/0.46 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.33/0.46 % Current number of processed clauses : 508
% 0.33/0.46 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 302
% 0.33/0.46 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.33/0.46 % Negative unit clauses : 7
% 0.33/0.46 % Non-unit-clauses : 199
% 0.33/0.46 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 231
% 0.33/0.46 % ...number of literals in the above : 483
% 0.33/0.46 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.33/0.46 % Current number of archived clauses : 25
% 0.33/0.46 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 7141
% 0.33/0.46 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5798
% 0.33/0.46 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 46
% 0.33/0.46 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2131
% 0.33/0.46 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.33/0.46 % BW rewrite match attempts : 7
% 0.33/0.46 % BW rewrite match successes : 7
% 0.33/0.46 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.33/0.46 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.33/0.46 % Termbank termtop insertions : 25395
% 0.33/0.46 % Search garbage collected termcells : 5239
% 0.33/0.46
% 0.33/0.46 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.33/0.46 % User time : 0.023 s
% 0.33/0.46 % System time : 0.004 s
% 0.33/0.46 % Total time : 0.027 s
% 0.33/0.46 % Maximum resident set size: 6400 pages
% 0.33/0.46
% 0.33/0.46 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.33/0.46 % User time : 0.040 s
% 0.33/0.46 % System time : 0.009 s
% 0.33/0.46 % Total time : 0.049 s
% 0.33/0.46 % Maximum resident set size: 5888 pages
% 0.33/0.46 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------