%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR073+5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v3.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:18:35 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.26s 25.27s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.26s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 15 ( 6 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 24 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 17 ( 8 ~; 4 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 3 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 17 ( 2 sgn 9 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query273,conjecture,
? [X2] :
( mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt)
=> tptptypes_5_387(X2,c_pushingababycarriage) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query273) ).
fof(ax4_206325,axiom,
! [X2,X3] :
( tptptypes_7_396(X2,X3)
=> tptptypes_6_388(X2,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+4.ax',ax4_206325) ).
fof(ax4_56790,axiom,
! [X2,X3] :
( tptptypes_6_388(X2,X3)
=> tptptypes_5_387(X2,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+4.ax',ax4_56790) ).
fof(ax4_16751,axiom,
tptptypes_7_396(c_tptpcol_16_13522,c_pushingababycarriage),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+4.ax',ax4_16751) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X2] :
( mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt)
=> tptptypes_5_387(X2,c_pushingababycarriage) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query273]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X47,X48] :
( tptptypes_6_388(X47,X48)
| ~ tptptypes_7_396(X47,X48) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax4_206325])])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
! [X30] :
( ~ tptptypes_5_387(X30,c_pushingababycarriage)
& mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X31,X32] :
( tptptypes_5_387(X31,X32)
| ~ tptptypes_6_388(X31,X32) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax4_56790])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( ~ tptptypes_7_396(X1,X2)
| tptptypes_6_388(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
tptptypes_7_396(c_tptpcol_16_13522,c_pushingababycarriage),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax4_16751]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
~ tptptypes_5_387(X1,c_pushingababycarriage),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ tptptypes_6_388(X1,X2)
| tptptypes_5_387(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
tptptypes_6_388(c_tptpcol_16_13522,c_pushingababycarriage),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
~ tptptypes_6_388(X1,c_pushingababycarriage),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05 % Problem : CSR073+5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v3.5.0.
% 0.00/0.08 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.17/0.41 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.41 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.41 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.41 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.17/0.41 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.17/0.41 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.41 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.17/0.41 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:47:46 UTC 2026
% 0.17/0.41 % CPUTime :
% 0.17/0.41 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.19/0.50 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.19/0.50 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/25.27 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.26/25.27 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.26/25.27 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 284 seconds (2272 total)
% 0.26/25.27 % Starting new_ho_10 with 568s (2) cores
% 0.26/25.27 % Starting sh3 with 568s (2) cores
% 0.26/25.27 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 568s (2) cores
% 0.26/25.27 % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 568s (2) cores
% 0.26/25.27 % ho_unfolding_3 with pid 372987 completed with status 0
% 0.26/25.27 % Result found by ho_unfolding_3
% 0.26/25.27 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.26/25.27 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 284 seconds (2272 total)
% 0.26/25.27 % Starting new_ho_10 with 568s (2) cores
% 0.26/25.27 % Starting sh3 with 568s (2) cores
% 0.26/25.27 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 568s (2) cores
% 0.26/25.27 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.26/25.27 % SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.26/25.27 % Search class: FHHSM-FSLM31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.26/25.27 % partial match(1): FGHSM-FSLM31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.26/25.27 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 2 cores with 563 seconds (563 total)
% 0.26/25.27 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 51s (1) cores
% 0.26/25.27 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 57s (1) cores
% 0.26/25.27 % ho_unfolding_3 with pid 372993 completed with status 0
% 0.26/25.27 % Result found by ho_unfolding_3
% 0.26/25.27 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.26/25.27 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 284 seconds (2272 total)
% 0.26/25.27 % Starting new_ho_10 with 568s (2) cores
% 0.26/25.27 % Starting sh3 with 568s (2) cores
% 0.26/25.27 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 568s (2) cores
% 0.26/25.27 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.26/25.27 % SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.26/25.27 % Search class: FHHSM-FSLM31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.26/25.27 % partial match(1): FGHSM-FSLM31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.26/25.27 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 2 cores with 563 seconds (563 total)
% 0.26/25.27 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 51s (1) cores
% 0.26/25.27 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 57s (1) cores
% 0.26/25.27 % Preprocessing time : 0.389 s
% 0.26/25.27 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.26/25.27
% 0.26/25.27 % Proof found!
% 0.26/25.27 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.26/25.27 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.26/25.27 % Parsed axioms : 540250
% 0.26/25.27 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 539747
% 0.26/25.27 % Initial clauses : 504
% 0.26/25.27 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 2
% 0.26/25.27 % Initial clauses in saturation : 502
% 0.26/25.27 % Processed clauses : 988
% 0.26/25.27 % ...of these trivial : 34
% 0.26/25.27 % ...subsumed : 29
% 0.26/25.27 % ...remaining for further processing : 925
% 0.26/25.27 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 0.26/25.27 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.26/25.27 % Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.26/25.27 % Backward-rewritten : 9
% 0.26/25.27 % Generated clauses : 387
% 0.26/25.27 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 217
% 0.26/25.27 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.26/25.27 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.26/25.27 % Paramodulations : 384
% 0.26/25.27 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.26/25.27 % NegExts : 0
% 0.26/25.27 % Equation resolutions : 1
% 0.26/25.27 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.26/25.28 % Total rewrite steps : 186
% 0.26/25.28 % ...of those cached : 120
% 0.26/25.28 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.26/25.28 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.26/25.28 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.26/25.28 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.26/25.28 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.26/25.28 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.26/25.28 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.26/25.28 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.26/25.28 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.26/25.28 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.26/25.28 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.26/25.28 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.26/25.28 % Current number of processed clauses : 474
% 0.26/25.28 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 270
% 0.26/25.28 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.26/25.28 % Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.26/25.28 % Non-unit-clauses : 202
% 0.26/25.28 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 169
% 0.26/25.28 % ...number of literals in the above : 255
% 0.26/25.28 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.26/25.28 % Current number of archived clauses : 450
% 0.26/25.28 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 13758
% 0.26/25.28 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 12752
% 0.26/25.28 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 29
% 0.26/25.28 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 789
% 0.26/25.28 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.26/25.28 % BW rewrite match attempts : 10
% 0.26/25.28 % BW rewrite match successes : 7
% 0.26/25.28 % Condensation attempts : 989
% 0.26/25.28 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.26/25.28 % Termbank termtop insertions : 3700323
% 0.26/25.28 % Search garbage collected termcells : 2174446
% 0.26/25.28
% 0.26/25.28 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.26/25.28 % User time : 4.410 s
% 0.26/25.28 % System time : 2.179 s
% 0.26/25.28 % Total time : 6.588 s
% 0.26/25.28 % Maximum resident set size: 1241884 pages
% 0.26/25.28
% 0.26/25.28 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.26/25.28 % User time : 20.948 s
% 0.26/25.28 % System time : 3.358 s
% 0.26/25.28 % Total time : 24.306 s
% 0.26/25.28 % Maximum resident set size: 456448 pages
% 0.26/25.28 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------